Paediatric Surgery (Ukraine).2022.3(76):36-40; doi 10.15574/PS.2022.76.36
Yehorov R. I., Efimenko V. P.
National Medical University named after A.A. Bogomolets, Kyiv, Ukraine

For citation: Yehorov RI, Efimenko VP. (2022). X-ray diagnosis of fractures of the condylar process of the lower jaw in children. Paediatric Surgery (Ukraine). 3(76): 36-40; doi 10.15574/PS.2022.76.36.
Article received: May 30, 2022. Accepted for publication: Sep 20, 2022.

Mandibular fractures are one of the most common and complex types of traumatic injuries of the maxillofacial region in children and account for 18-66% of the total number of facial fractures. Among which, fractures in the area of the condylar processes of the mandible (CP) occur in 25-40% of cases.
Purpose – to reveal the radiological features of CP fractures in children and to determine the most informative diagnostic methods.
Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis of 25 case histories of children with traumatic fractures of the VGNP aged 4 to 18 years was carried out. The analysis of case histories was carried out according to the developed survey map. Under our supervision there were 25 children with traumatic fractures of CP. The age of children ranged from 4 to 17 years, the average age was 10.04 years (±4.09). All children were divided into groups, among which the largest group consisted of children aged 7-12 years – 52% (n=13) of children.
Results. Unilateral fractures were detected in 84% (n=21) and bilateral in 16% (n=4) of children, among them with displacement in 92% (n=23). CP fractures in the region of the head were diagnosed in 36% (n=9), the base in 32% (n=8), the neck in 28% (n=7) and the combination of the base and neck in 4% (n=1).
Conclusions. The only method that allows obtaining maximum information about various injuries in the bone structures of the joint is CT and spiral 3D-CT. The latter, in turn, allows you to detail any changes in the bone elements of the temporo-mandibular joint for diagnosis, selection and planning of individual treatment tactics, which reduces the time of surgery and the child's stay under anesthesia.
The research was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of the participating institution. The informed consent of the patient was obtained for conducting the studies.
No conflict of interests was declared by the authors.
Keywords: fracture, condylar process, lower jaw, children.
REFERENCES

1. Cazzolla A, Montaruli G, Testa N, Favia G, Lacaita M, Lo Muzio L, Ciavarella D. (2018). Non-surgical Treatment of Condylar Fracture in an 11-Year-Old Patient: a Case Report. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 29; 9 (2): e5. https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2018.9205; PMid:30116517 PMCid:PMC6090249

2. Elarabi M, Bataineh A. (2018). Changing pattern and etiology of maxillofacial fractures during the civil uprising in Western Libya. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 1; 23 (2): 248-255. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.22268; PMid:29476683 PMCid:PMC5911362

3. Kannari L, Marttila E, Toivari M, Thorén H, Snäll J. (2020). Paediatric mandibular fracture-a diagnostic challenge? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 49 (11): 1439-1444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2020.06.008; PMid:32680807

4. McGoldrick D, Parmar P, Williams R, Monaghan A, McMillan K. (2019). Management of Pediatric Condyle Fractures. J Craniofac Surg. 30 (7): 2045-2047. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000005787; PMid:31369504

5. Mukhopadhyay S. (2018). A retrospective study of mandibular fractures in children. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 44 (6): 269-274. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2018.44.6.269; PMid:30637240 PMCid:PMC6327018

6. Nezam S, Kumar A, Shukla JN, Khan SA. (2018). Management of mandibular fracture in pediatric patient. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 9 (1): 106-109. https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.NJMS_54_17; PMid:29937672 PMCid:PMC5996639

7. Rozeboom A, Dubois L, Bos R. (2017). Closed treatment of unilateral mandibular condyle fractures in adults: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 46: 456-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2016.11.009; PMid:27955799

8. Stähli C, Eliades T, Papageorgiou S. (2021). Functional appliance treatment for mandibular fractures: A systematic review with meta-analyses. J Oral Rehabil. 48 (8): 945-954. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.13178; PMid:33963591 PMCid:PMC8362118

9. Vanpoecke J, Dubron K, Politis C. (2020). Condylar Fractures: An Argument for Conservative Treatment. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 13 (1): 23-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1943387520902881; PMid:32642028 PMCid:PMC7311847