• Uterine leiomyomas of FIGO types 0, 1, and 2 in women of reproductive age: an analysis of clinical and fertility indicators
en To content Full text of article

Uterine leiomyomas of FIGO types 0, 1, and 2 in women of reproductive age: an analysis of clinical and fertility indicators

Ukrainian Journal Health of Woman. 2026. 1(182): 44-49. doi: 10.15574/HW.2026.1(182).4449
Kochetkov M. S.1, Suslikova L. V.1, Markevych B. О.2, Taran O. A.2, Tytarenko N. V.2Strutynska O. B.2
1Shupyk National Healthcare University of Ukraine, Kyiv
2National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnytsia, Ukraine

For citation: Kochetkov MS, Suslikova LV, Markevych BО, Taran OA, Tytarenko NV, Strutynska OB. (2026). Uterine leiomyomas of FIGO types 0, 1, and 2 in women of reproductive age: an analysis of clinical and fertility indicators. Ukrainian Journal Health of Woman. 1(182): 44-49. doi: 10.15574/HW.2026.1(182).4449
Article received: Nov 24, 2025. Accepted for publication: Jan 28, 2026.

Uterine fibroids are one of the most common pathologies among women of reproductive age, which can affect fertility and the course of pregnancy and childbirth.
Aim – to investigate the prevalence and clinical-anamnestic characteristics of FIGO types 0-2 fibroids and to evaluate their impact on the fertility of women of reproductive age in order to rationalize surgical treatment of this pathology in patients with reproductive plans.
Materials and methods. A cohort study was conducted involving 3,455 women of reproductive age (20-45 years) who received primary outpatient consultation during 2020. The retrospective part of the study analyzed the prevalence of FIGO types 0-2 submucosal uterine fibroids; the prospective part analyzed reproductive outcomes in women diagnosed with uterine leiomyoma of FIGO types 0, 1, and 2. Statistical data processing was performed using the SPSS 21 programme.
Results. The prevalence of uterine leiomyomas among women of reproductive age was 41.8%, with FIGO types 0, 1, and 2 accounting for 8.4% of cases. In 95% of cases, uterine leiomyomas in women of reproductive age were symptomatic, presenting with heavy, prolonged, or frequent menstruation (69.4%), intermenstrual uterine bleeding (44.6%), pelvic pain (28.9%), anemia (15.7%), and infertility (11.6%). A significantly higher incidence of infertility and early spontaneous miscarriage (before 12 weeks of gestation) was observed in women with FIGO types 0, 1, and 2 leiomyomas compared to women without uterine leiomyomas.
Conclusions. The findings of the present study indicate that FIGO types 0, 1, and 2 uterine leiomyomas have a significant impact on women’s reproductive health, particularly on the incidence of infertility and pregnancy outcomes.
The research was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of participating institution. Informed consent was obtained from patients for examination and treatment.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Keywords: uterine fibroids, reproductive function, women.

REFERENCES

1. Alkhrait S, Malasevskaia I, Madueke-Laveaux OS. (2023). Fibroids and Fertility. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 50(4): 663-675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2023.08.006; PMid:37914486

2. Antonaci D, Galanti F, Dall'Alba R, Benedetti E, Rago A, Antonaci L et al. (2026). A Proposed Model of a Pragmatic Surgical Approach in Women Affected by Uterine Fibroids Undergoing IVF: A "Real Practice" Experience. J Clin Med. 15(1): 379. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15010379; PMid:41517627 PMCid:PMC12787123

3. Bajaj S, Gopal N, Clingan MJ, Bhatt S. (2022). A pictorial review of ultrasonography of the FIGO classification for uterine leiomyomas. Abdom Radiol (NY). 47(1): 341-351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-03283-6; PMid:34581926

4. Bulun SE, Yin P, Wei J, Zuberi A, Iizuka T, Suzuki T et al. (2025). Uterine fibroids. Physiol Rev. 105(4): 1947-1988. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00010.2024; PMid:40214304 PMCid:PMC12419501

5. Buyukcelebi K, Chen X, Abdula F, Elkafas H, Duval AJ, Ozturk H et al. (2023). Engineered MED12 mutations drive leiomyoma-like transcriptional and metabolic programs by altering the 3D genome compartmentalization. Nat Commun. 14(1): 4057. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39684-y; PMid:37429859 PMCid:PMC10333368

6. Chen WH, Ku YL, Yang YH, Lee CP, Chen KJ et al. (2024). Associations between the time interval from myomectomy to subsequent pregnancy and the obstetric outcomes: A population-based cohort study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 167(2): 631-640. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15610; PMid:38801238

7. Cianci S, Gulino FA, Palmara V, La Verde M, Ronsini C, Romeo P et al. (2023). Exploring Surgical Strategies for Uterine Fibroid Treatment: A Comprehensive Review of Literature on Open and Minimally Invasive Approaches. Medicina (Kaunas). 60(1): 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60010064; PMid:38256325 PMCid:PMC10820219

8. Favilli A, Etrusco A, Chiantera V, Laganà AS, Cicinelli E et al. (2023). Impact of FIGO type 3 uterine fibroids on in vitro fertilization outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 163(2): 528-539. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.14838; PMid:37183601

9. Golyanovskiy OV, Kachur OYu, Budchenko MА, Supruniuk KV, Frolov SV. (2021). Uterine leiomyoma: modern aspects of clinic, diagnosis and treatment FrolovUterine leiomyoma: modern aspects of clinic, diagnosis and treatment. Reproductive Health Of Woman. 5(50): 7-18. https://doi.org/10.30841/2708-8731.5.2021.240017

10. Hartmann K, Edwards DRV, Savitz DA, Jonsson-Funk ML, WuP, Sundermann AC et al. (2017). Prospective cohort study of uter ine fibroids and miscarriage risk. Am J Epidemiol. 186(10): 1140-1148. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwx062; PMid:28591761 PMCid:PMC5860279

11. Lisiecki M, Paszkowski M, Woźniak S. (2017). Fertility impairment associated with uterine fibroids – a review of literature. Prz Menopauzalny. 16(4): 137-140. https://doi.org/10.5114/pm.2017.72759; PMid:29483857 PMCid:PMC5824684

12. Micić J, Macura M, Andjić M, Ivanović K, Dotlić J, Micić DD et al. (2024). Currently Available Treatment Modalities for Uterine Fibroids. Medicina (Kaunas). 60(6): 868. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60060868; PMid:38929485 PMCid:PMC11205795

13. Munro MG. (2022). Uterine leiomyomas: actionable evidence needed! Fertil Steril. 117(5): 1094-1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.02.029; PMid:35512970

14. Pritts EA. (2025). Uterine Leiomyomas and Reproduction. Obstet Gynecol. 145(1): 39-45. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005748; PMid:39326048

15. Pritts TL, Ogden M, Parker W, Ratcliffe J, Pritts EA. (2024). Intramural Leiomyomas and Fertility: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 144(2): 171-179. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005661; PMid:38935974

16. Siristatidis C, Vaidakis D, Rigos I, Chrelias G, Papantoniou N. (2016). Leiomyomas and infertility. Minerva Ginecol. 68(3): 283-296.

17. Sujatha R, Jayasheela M, Bhavani K. (2021). Leiomyoma types, incidence and clinical presentation – a study at a tertiary care hospital. IJAR. 9(10): 438-443. https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/13563

18. Sundermann AC, Edwards DRV, Bray MJ, Jones SH, Latham SM, Hartmann KE. (2017). Leiomyomas in pregnancy and spontaneous abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 130(5): 1065-1072. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002313; PMid:29016496 PMCid:PMC5656535

19. Tatarchuk TF, Bulavenko OV, Hryshchenko OV, Artyomenko VV, Dubossarska YU, Zanko OV et al. (2023). Management of patients with uterine leiomyoma. Evidence-based clinical guidelines. Medychni aspekty zdorovia zhinky. 2(149): 8-31.

20. Vdovichenko YP, Golianovsky OV, Lopushan IV. (2012). Uterine leiomyoma: aetiopathogenesis, preventive care, diagnostics and treatment (literature review). Health of Woman. 3(69): 52-61.

21. Venturella R, Lukes AS, Wu R, McLean R, Rakov VG, Al-Hendy A. (2024). Quality of life improvements in women with uterine fibroids treated with relugolix combination therapy during the LIBERTY long-term extension study: A descriptive subgroup analysis in women with anemia at baseline. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 165(2): 431-441. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15505; PMid:38576220

22. Wang PH, Yang ST, Chang WH, Liu HH, Lee WL. (2025). Transcervical resection of myoma (TCRM): Part I. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 64(1): 27-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2024.11.002; PMid:39794046