Paediatric Surgery (Ukraine).2022.4(77):17-22; doi 10.15574/PS.2022.77.17
Borova-Halay O. E.¹, Malovanyy B. Y.¹, Pereyaslov A. A.², Nykyforuk O. M.^1,2
1CNE of LRC Lviv Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital «OHMATDYT», Ukraine
²Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Ukraine

For citation: Borova-Halay OE, Malovanyy BY, Pereyaslov AA, Nykyforuk OM. (2022). Ultrasonography in diagnostic of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in children: advantages and pitfalls. Paediatric Surgery (Ukraine). 4(77): 17-22; doi 10.15574/PS.2022.77.17.
Article received: Sep 28, 2022. Accepted for publication: Des 08, 2022.

Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (HPS) in newborns is the one of the most frequent causes of vomiting that required surgery. During long period of time, X-ray was the main method for the confirming diagnosis of HPS, however after first reports about possibilities of ultrasonography (US), this method was widely applied in clinical practice.
Purpose – to summarize own experience of US applying for the diagnostic of HPS; determining advantages and disadvantages of this method of examination.
Materials and methods. This study based on the US results of 93 patients with HPS and 27 children with pylorospasm that were observed and treated in Lviv regional children’s clinical hospital for 2009-2020 years.
By US measured the thickness of pyloric muscle, length, front-posterior (transverse) size, and diameter of orifice of pyloric canal.
Results of the study were evaluated by the statistical program StatPlus: mac, AnalystSoft Inc. (version v8).
Results. The thickness of pyloric muscle and pyloric canal length are the major criteria of confirming/excluding HPS diagnosis. By the measurement of pyloric muscle thickness, it is necessary to remember that tangential position of transducer and muscles’ contraction can cause pseudo-thickening. According to the results of the study, the thickness of pyloric muscle in case of HPS was 6.4±0.3 mm (a range – 3-10 mm) and was no correlation nor with duration of illness (p=0.364) nor with age of child (p=0.534). In pylorospasm, which clinically can simulate HPS, the thickness of the pyloric muscle was 3.02±0.1 mm, what is significantly less compared to infants with HPS (Student’s t-test – 1.983; p=0.0000). Pyloric canal length in case of HPS was 22.9±0.6 mm (a range – 16-32 mm), what also was significantly differed than in case of pylorospasm – 15.8±0.5 mm (Student’s t-test – 1.998; p=0.0000). This was only indicator that clear correlated with child’s age (p=0.004) and duration of illness (p=0.006). Diameter of pyloric canal orifice and front-posterior size differed from indices in children with pylorospasm also. According to the results of ROC analysis, the best markers for the confirming diagnosis of HPS was thickness of pyloric muscle, its length, and front-posterior size, while the diameter of pyloric canal orifice shows the moderate prognostic significance.
Conclusions. Ultrasonographic examination makes it possible to establish the diagnosis of HPS in newborns with a high degree of reliability. A doctor, who performs US in a child with suspected pylorostenosis, should be guided by the size of the unchanged pyloric canal and in case of its hypertrophy remember the «pitfalls» in the examination and know the ways to overcome them.
The research was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of all participating institutions. The informed consent of the patient was obtained for conducting the studies.
No conflict of interests was declared by the authors.
Keywords: hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, diagnostic, ultrasonography.

REFERENCES

1. Acker SN, Garcia AJ, Ross JT, Somme S. (2015). Current trends in the diagnosis and treatment of pyloric stenosis. Pediatr Surg Int. 31 (4): 363-366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-015-3682-3; PMid:25672283

2. Argyropoulou MI, Hadjigeorgi CG, Kiortsis DN. (1998). Antro-pyloric canal values from early prematurity to full-term gestational age: an ultrasound study. Pediatr Radiol. 28 (12): 933-936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002470050504; PMid:9880636

3. Ayaz ÜY, Döğen ME, Dilli A et al. (2015). The use of ultrasonography in infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: does the patient's age and weight affect pyloric size and pyloric ratio? Med Ultrason. 17 (1): 28-33. https://doi.org/10.11152/mu.2013.2066.171.uya; PMid:25745654

4. Bakal U, Sarac M, Aydin M et al. (2016). Recent changes in the features of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Pediatr Int. 58 (5): 369-371. https://doi.org/10.1111/ped.12860; PMid:26615824

5. Calle-Toro JS, Kaplan SL, Andronikou S. (2020). Are we performing ultrasound measurements of the wall thickness in hypertrophic pyloric stenosis studies the same way? Pediatr Surg Int. 36 (3): 399-405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-019-04601-2; PMid:31758244

6. Chiarenza SF, Bleve C, Escolino M et al. (2020). Guidelines of the Italian Society of Videosurgery (SIVI) in infancy for the minimally invasive treatment of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in neonates and infants. Pediatr Med Chir. 42 (1): 16-24. https://doi.org/10.4081/pmc.2020.243

7. Costa Dias S, Swinson S, Torrão H, et al. (2012). Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: tips and tricks for ultrasound diagnosis. Insights Imaging. 3 (3): 247-250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-012-0168-x; PMid:22696086 PMCid:PMC3369120

8. Donda K, Asare-Afriyie B, Ayensu M et al. (2019). Pyloric stenosis: national trends in the incidence rate and resource use in the United States from 2012 to 2016. Hosp Pediatr. 9 (12): 923-932. https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2019-0112; PMid:31748239

9. Dorinzi N, Pagenhardt J, Sharon M et al. (2017). Immediate emergency department diagnosis of pyloric stenosis with point-of-care ultrasound. Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med. 1 (4): 395-398. https://doi.org/10.5811/cpcem.2017.9.35016; PMid:29849342 PMCid:PMC5965224

10. Hernanz-Schulman M. (2003). Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Radiology. 227 (2): 319-331. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2272011329; PMid:12637675

11. Hernanz-Schulman M. (2009). Pyloric stenosis: role of imaging. Pediatr Radiol. 39 (2): S134-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-1106-4; PMid:19308372

12. Hsu P, Klimek J, Nanan R. (2014). Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: does size really matter? J Paediatr Child Health. 50 (10): 827-828. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.2010.01778.x; PMid:20598068

13. Keckler SJ, Ostlie DJ, Holcomb III GW, St. Peter SD. (2008). The progressive development of pyloric stenosis: a role for repeat ultrasound. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 18 (3): 168-170. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1038533; PMid:18493891

14. Krogh C, Gortz S, Wohlfahrt J et al. (2012). Pre- and perinatal risk factors for pyloric stenosis and their influence on the male predominance. Am J Epidemiol. 176 (1): 24-31. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwr493; PMid:22553083

15. Ma S, Liu J, Zhang Y. (2017). Application of color Doppler ultrasound combined with Doppler imaging artifacts in the diagnosis and estimate of congenital hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Sci Rep. 7 (1): 9527. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10264-7; PMid:28842652 PMCid:PMC5573336

16. Meister M, Alharthi O, Kim JS, Son JK. (2020). Pediatric emergency gastrointestinal ultrasonography: pearls & pitfalls. Clin Imaging. 64: 103-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.03.002; PMid:32438254

17. Niedzielski J, Kobielski A, Sokal J, Krakós M. (2011). Accuracy of sonographic criteria in the decision for surgical treatment in infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Arch Med Sci. 7 (3): 508-511. https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2011.23419; PMid:22295036 PMCid:PMC3258744

18.Piotto L, Gent R, Taranath A, et al. (2022). Ultrasound diagnosis of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis – Time to change the criteria. Australas J Ultrasound Med. 25 (3): 116-126. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajum.12305; PMid:35978726

19. Solovjov A, Spakhi O, Baruhovich V, Ljaturinskaja O. (2008). Diagnostics congenital hypertrophic pylorostenosis at present stage. Khirurhiia dytiachoho viku. 19 (2): 72-74.

20. Spakhy OV. (2015). Diagnostic peculiarities of congenital hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in children today. Khirurhiia dytiachoho viku. 17 (3): 72-74. https://doi.org/10.24061/2413-4260.V.3.17.2015.12

21.Teele RL, Smith EH. (1977). Ultrasound in the diagnosis of idiopathic hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. N Engl J Med. 296 (20): 1149-1150. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197705192962006; PMid:854046

22. Vinycomb T, Vanhaltren K, Pacilli M et al. (2021). Evaluating the validity of ultrasound in diagnosing hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study. ANZ J Surg. 91 (11): 2507-2513. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.17247; PMid:34608732

23. Vinycomb TI, Laslett K, Gwini SM et al. (2019). Presentation and outcomes in hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: An 11-year review. J Paediatr Child Health. 55 (10): 1183-1187. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.14372; PMid:30677197

24. Vinycomb TI, Vanhaltren K, Pacilli M et al. (2022). Stratifying features for diagnosing hypertrophic stenosis on ultrasound: a diagnostic accuracy study. ANZ J Surg. 92 (5): 1153-1158. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.17649; PMid:35393697 PMCid:PMC9322541

25. Zhu J, Zhu T, Lin Z et al. (2017). Perinatal risk factors for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg. 52 (9): 1389-1397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.02.017; PMid:28318599