HEALTH OF WOMAN. 2015.9(105):94–97 

The modern approach to the preservation of reproductive potential 

Veropotvelyan P. N., Tsehmistrenko I. S., Veropotvelyan N. P., Glamazda A. I.

The «Inter-provincial center of medical genetics and prenatal diagnosis», Krivoy Rog

Perinatal center, Kiev

A.A. Bogomolets National Medical University, Kiev 

The problem of birth control is particularly relevant where the level of abortion remains high and leads to negative consequences for women’s health. This article presents the results of numerous publications modern contraceptive strategies based and wider application of funds for contraceptive, and in case of lack of effectiveness of the use of modern methods of abortion.

It presents a higher commitment and effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception, compared with combined oral contraceptives. 

Key words: contraception, contraceptive methods prolonged, combined oral contraceptives, abortion. 

REFERENCES

1. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Induced termination of pregnancy and future reproductive outcomes – current evidence. 16 September, 2009. Available at: http://www.rcog.org.uk/. Дата обращения 22.06.2014.

2. Brown JS, Adera T, Masho SW. 2008. Previous abortion and the risk of low birth weight and preterm births. J. Commun. Health 62(1):16–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech.2006.050369

3. Voigt M, Henrich W, Zygmunt M, Friese K, Straube S, Briese V. 2009. Is induced abortion a risk factor in subsequent pregnancy. J. Perinat. Med. 37(2):144–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2009.001; PMid:18976047

4. Henriet L, Kaminski M. 2001. Impact of induced abortions on subsequent pregnancy outcome: the 1995 French national perinatal survey. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 108(1):1036–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00243.x; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0306-5456(01)00243-1

5. Bhattacharya S, Lowit A, Bhattacharya S, Raja EA, Lee AJ, Mahmood T, Templeton A. 2012. Reproductive outcomes following induced abortion: a national register-based cohort study in Scotland. BMJ Open. 2(4):e000911. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000911; PMid:22869092 PMCid:PMC4400701

6. Templeton A, Grimes DA. 2011. A request for abortion. N. Engl. J. Med. 365:2198–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp1103639; PMid:22150038

7. Russo JA, Achilles S, DePineres T, Gil L. 2012. Controversies in family planning: postabortal pelvic inflammatory disease. Contraception 87(4):497–503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2012.04.005 
PMid:22652188 PMCid:PMC3744760

8. Lohr PA, Fjerstad M, DeSilva U, Lyus R. 2014. Abortion. Clinical review. Br. Med. J. 348:755–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f7553

9. Virk MS, Zhang J, Olsen J. 2007. Abortion and the risk of subsequent adverse pregnancy outcomes. N. Engl. J. Med. 357(7):648–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa070445; PMid:17699814

10. Beral V, Bull D, Doll R, Peto R, Reeves G. 2004. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Breast cancer and abortion: collaborative reanalysis of data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 83000 women with breast cancer from 16 countries”. Lancet. 363(9414):1007–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15835-2

11. Dicke GB. 2015. Current strategies for reproductive choice – international and domestic experience. Оobstetrics and gynecology 3:5–10.

12. Sihvo S, Hemminki E, Kosunen E. 1998. Contraceptive health risks – women’s perceptions. J. Psychosom. Obstet. Gynaecol. 19:117–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/01674829809025689; PMid:9844842

13. Singh S, Wulf D, Hussain R, Bankole A, Sedgh G. 2009. Abortion worldwide: a decade of uneven progress (Report). New York: Guttmacher Institute:65.

14. Singh S, Darroch JE, Vlassoff M, Nadeau J. 2009. Adding it Up: The benefits of investing in sexual and reproductive health care (Report). New York: The Guttmacher Institute and UNFPA:41.

15. David HP, Skilogianis J eds. 1999. From abortion to contraception: a resource to public policies and reproductive behavior in Central and Eastern Europe from 1917 to the present. Westport, Conn.; London: Greenwood Press: 145–64.

16. Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research. 2012: 123.

17. World Abortion Policies. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. 2012. Available at: http://www.un.org/.

18. Stoddard A, McNicholas C, Peipert JF. 2011. Efficacy and safety of long-acting reversible contraception. Drugs 71(8):969–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.2165/11591290-000000000-00000; PMid:21668037 PMCid:PMC3662967

19. Thompson KM, Speidel JJ, Saporta V, Waxman NJ, Harper CC. 2011. Contraceptive policies affect post-abortion provision of long-acting reversible contraception. Contraception 83(1):41–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2010.06.008; PMid:21134502

20. Dicke GB. 2014. Kontraversii safe and unsafe abortion. Doctor. RU. Gynecology. Endocrinology 8(96):51–5.

21. Charles VE, Polis CB, Sridhara SK, Blum RW. 2008. Abortion and long-term mental health outcomes: a systematic review of the evidence. Contraception 78(6):436–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2008.07.005; PMid:19014789

22. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The care of women requesting induced abortion. London (England); 2011; Nov. 130 p. (Evidence-based Clinical Guideline 7). Available at: http: //www. rcog. org.uk.

23. Ancel PY, Lelong N, Papiernik E, Saurel-Cubizolles MJ, Kaminski M. 2004. EUROPOP. History of induced abortion as a risk factor for preterm birth in European countries: results of the EUROPOP survey. Hum. Reprod. 19(3):734–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh107

24. Hogue CJR, Boardman LA, Stotland N. 2009. Answering questions about long-term outcomes. In: Paul M, Lichtenberg S, Borgatta L, Grimes DA, Stubblefield PG, Creinin MD, eds. Management of unintended and abnormal pregnancy: comprehensive abortion care. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell:252–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444313031.ch16

25. American Psychological Association, Task Force on Mental Health and Abortion. Report of the Task Force on Mental Health and Abortion. Washington, DC. 2008. Available at: http://www.apa.org/

26. Гінекологія. На замітку лікарю. www.health ua.com