- The review of scientific papers on the problem of perinatal care for pregnant women with newly diagnosed benign breast tumors during pregnancy
The review of scientific papers on the problem of perinatal care for pregnant women with newly diagnosed benign breast tumors during pregnancy
Ukrainian Journal of Perinatology and Pediatrics. 2019. 4(80): 58-63; doi 10.15574/PP.2019.80.58
Dronova V. L.1, Dronov О. І.1,2,3, Mokryk О. М.1, Bakunets Y. P.1,2,3, Tesluk R. S.1
1SI «Institute of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology named of academician O.M. Lukyanova of the NAMS of Ukraine», Kyiv
2Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine
3Kyiv City Clinical Hospital No. 10, Ukraine
For citation: Dronova VL, Dronov ОІ, Mokryk ОМ, Bakunets YP, Tesluk RS. (2019). The review of scientific papers on the problem of perinatal care for pregnant women with newly diagnosed benign breast tumors during pregnancy. Ukrainian Journal of Perinatology and Pediatrics. 4(80): 58–63. doi 10.15574/PP.2019.80.58
Article received: Aug 06, 2019. Accepted for publication: Dec 16, 2019.
The article presents a review of scientific papers on the problem of perinatal care for pregnant women with newly diagnosed benign breast tumors during pregnancy. Our interest in this issue is due to an increase in the frequency of detection of benign breast tumors during pregnancy in Ukraine. It is well known that against the background of diffuse or localized hyperplastic processes in the mammary gland, cancer occurs many times more often than in intact mammary glands. All of the above, dictates the need to adhere to the principle of multidisciplinarity and succession between obstetrician-gynecologists, mammologists, oncologists and family doctors in the management of this patient population, with the aim of timely detection and adequate surgical treatment of these tumors during pregnancy with its preservation.
No conflict of interest were declared by the authors.
Key words: benign breast tumors, pregnancy.
REFERENСES
1. Porter P. (2008). «Evropeizatsiya» riska razvitiya raka molochnoy zhelezyi. Meditsinskie aspektyi zdorovya zhenschinyi. 3 (12): 70-71.
2. Gromova AM, Gromova AL. (2006). Osobennosti ginekologicheskogo obsledovaniya bolnyih s zabolevaniyami molochnyih zhelez. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 6: 39–40.
3. Zhabchenko IA. (2012). Rak molochnoy zhelezyi, assotsiirovannyiy s beremennostyu. Reproduktivnoe zdorove. Vostochnaya Evropa. 4(22): 119-129.
4. Zotov AS, Belik EO. (2005). Mastopatii i rak molochnoy zhelezyi. Moskva: MEDpressinform: 112.
5. Zotov AS, Velik EO, Cheshuk VE. (2004). Mastopatiya i rak molochnoy zhelezyi. Kiev: 87.
6. Lasachko SA, Kvashenko VP, Yashina EG. (2007). Diagnostika i vozmozhnosti terapii mastodinii v praktike akushera-ginekologa. Novosti farmatsii i meditsinyi. 3 (207): 8.
7. Lutsenko NS. (2006). Mastopatiya: problemyi i resheniya. Reproduktivnoe zdorove zhenschinyi. 1 (25): 55-58.
8. Radzinskiy VE, Ordiyants IM, Maslennikova MN, Pavlova EA. (2012). Molochnyie zhelezyi i ginekologicheskie bolezni: ot obschnosti patologicheskih vozzreniy k prakticheskim resheniyam (metodicheskoe pismo). Moskva: Redaktsiya zhurnala Status Praesens: 16.
9. Radzinskiy VE. (2010). Molochnyie zhelezyi i ginekologicheskie bolezni. Moskva: Mediabyuro Status prezens: 304.
10. Sinitsyin VA, Rudneva TV. (2007). Lechenie bolnyih s fibrozno-kistoznoy mastopatiey, soprovozhdayuscheysya bolevyim sindromom. Zhinochiy likar. 6: 31-33.
11. Parnes A, Akalin A, Quinlan R, Vijayaraghavan G. (2013). AIRP best cases in radiologic-pathologic correlation. Lactating adenoma Radiographics. 33: 455–459. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.332125095; PMid:23479707
12. Robbins J, Jeffries D, Roubidoux M, Helvie M. (2011). Accuracy of diagnostic mammography and breast ultrasound during pregnancy and lactation AJR. Am J Roentgenol. 196: 716–722. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.3662; PMid:21343518
13. Rozen P. (2001). Rozens breast pathology (2d ed.). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. New York.
14. Sabate JM, Clotet M, Torrubia S, Gomez A, Guerrero R, de las Heras P et al. (2007). Radiological evaluation of breast disorders related to pregnancy and lactation Radiographics. 27: S101–S124. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.27si075505; PMid:18180221
15. Sechopoulos I, Suryanarayanan S, Vedantham S, D’Orsi C, Karellas A. (2008). Radiation dose to organs and tissues from mammography: Monte Carlo and phantom study. Radiology. 246: 434–443. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2462070256; PMid:18056857 PMCid:PMC2430752
16. Sechopoulos I, Suryanarayanan S, Vedantham S, D’Orsi C, Karellas A. (2008). Radiation dose to organs and tissues from mammography: Monte Carlo and phantom study Radiology. 246: 434–443. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2462070256; PMid:18056857 PMCid:PMC2430752
17. Son E, Oh K, Kim E. (2006). Pregnancy associated breast disease: radiologic features and diagnostic dilemmas. Yonsei Med J. 47: 34–42. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2006.47.1.34; PMid:16502483 PMCid:PMC2687579
18. Tremblay E, Therasse E, Thomassin-Naggara I, Trop I. (2012). Guidelines for use of medical imaging during pregnancy and lactation Radiographics. 32: 897–911. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.323115120; PMid:22403117
19. Vashi R, Hooley R, Butler R, Geisel J, Philpotts L. (2013). Breast imaging of the pregnant and lactating patient: physiologic changes and common benign entities AJR. 200: 329–336. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.9845; PMid:23345354
20. Vashi R, Hooley R, Butler R, Geisel J, Philpotts L. (2013). Breast imaging of the pregnant and lactating patient: imaging modalities and pregnancy-associated breast cancer AJR. Am J Roentgenol. 200: 321–328. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.9814; PMid:23345353
21. Wang P, Chong S, Kielar A, Kelly A, Knoepp U, Mazza M et al. (2012). Imaging of the pregnant and lactating patients: part 1, evidence-based review and recommendations AJR. Am J Roentgenol. 198: 778–784. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.7405; PMid:22451541