Ukrainian Journal Health of Woman. 2026. 2(183): 54-64. doi: 10.15574/HW.2026.2(183).5464
Basalaieva A. V.
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine

For citation: Basalaieva AV. (2026). Public policy in the field of women's health: challenges and implementation issues. Ukrainian Journal Health of Woman. 2(183): 54-64. doi: 10.15574/HW.2026.2(183).5464
Article received: Dec 13, 2025. Accepted for publication: Mar 22, 2026.

Demographic decline, the increasing prevalence of endocrine, oncological, mental health, and reproductive disorders among women, as well as the consequences of the full-scale war in Ukraine, have intensified the need to enhance the effectiveness of citizens’ participation in the management of state and public affairs in the process of shaping public policy on women's health. In Ukraine, the legal regulation of this area remains fragmented and is predominantly focused on reproductive health, which narrows the approaches to the protection of women’s endocrine, mental, oncological, and age-related health.
Aim – to identify the key challenges in the implementation of public policy on women's health; to assess their impact on the State’s fulfilment of its positive obligations to ensure accessible and high-quality healthcare for women; and to evaluate compliance with the principle of good governance in this field.
The methodological framework of the study is based on interdisciplinary and complementary approaches, employing formal-legal, systemic-structural, comparative-legal, hermeneutic, and legal modelling methods. The study analyses the provisions of the Constitution of Ukraine, international human rights instruments, the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, Ukrainian legislation, official statistical data, and foreign experience in the development of women's health policies. The research identifies the key shortcomings of the Ukrainian model, including regulatory fragmentation, the predominance of a reproductive-centred approach, insufficient integration of endocrinological care, territorial inequalities in access to healthcare services, and the absence of a specialised women's health strategy. Comparative legal analysis demonstrates that effective foreign models are based on a comprehensive approach encompassing prevention, early diagnosis, gender-sensitive governance, and the participation of women in health policy-making.
Conclusions. The study substantiates the necessity of transitioning from a fragmented model of public policy on women's health to a comprehensive model based on the principles of good governance, gender sensitivity, and genuine accessibility of healthcare services. The priority directions identified include: the formal recognition of women's health protection as a distinct area of public policy; the development of a National Women's Health Strategy; the integration of endocrinological and mental healthcare services; the strengthening of women's participation in decision-making processes; and ensuring the continuity of healthcare provision during martial law and post-war recovery.
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Keywords: women's health, healthcare, public policy, right to participate in the management of state affairs, public affairs, principle of good governance.

REFERENCES

1. Belova MV, Belov OM. (2025). Reproductive rights as a component of fourth-generation rights: theoretical and legal analysis. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Series: Law. 88(1): 115-121. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2025.88.1.15

2. Berro Pizzarossa L. (2018). Here to Stay: The Evolution of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights in International Human Rights Law. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 46(4): 755-763.

3. Berro Pizzarossa L. (2018). The Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Framework: A Critical Analysis of International Human Rights Law. Utrecht Law Review. 14(2): 1-15.

4. Blihar MM, Zharovska IM, Shandra BB, Zaiats OS. (2021). Legal relations in the field of human reproductive activity. Reproductive Endocrinology. 1-2(63-64): 97-104. https://doi.org/10.18370/2309-4117.2022.63.97-104

5. Buletsa S, Deshko L. (2018). Comprehensive reforms of the health care system in different regions of the world. Medicine and Law. 37(4): 683-700.

6. Buletsa S, Deshko L, Zaborovskyy V. (2019). The peculiarities of changing health care system in Ukraine. Medicine and Law. 38(3): 427-442.

7. Chechersky VI. (2020). Correlation between the human right to reproductive reproduction and reproductive rights. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Series: Law. 61(1): 56-59. https://doi.org/10.32782/2307-3322.61-1.12

8. Deshko L, Vasylchenko O. (2024). Reproductive rights of military personnel, the principle of justice, the right to information and compensation for moral damage. European Perspectives. 4: 189-196. https://doi.org/10.32782/ep.2024.4.10

9. Deshko L, Vasylchenko O, Sherbak I, Galai V, Medvid A. (2021). Ukraine's international liabilities on initiation of measures for public health protection and the role of local authorities in implementation of health care policy. Georgian Medical News. 312: 163-168.

10. England. Renewed Women's Health Strategy for England [Internet]. URL: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/renewed-womens-health-strategy-for-england.

11. European Court of Human Rights. (2007). Case of Tysiąc v. Poland, no. 5410/03, Judgment of 20 March 2007 [Internet].

12. European Court of Human Rights. (2011). Case of R.R. v. Poland, no. 27617/04, Judgment of 26 May 2011 [Internet].

13. European Court of Human Rights. (2017). Case of López de Sousa Fernandes v. Portugal, no. 56080/13, Judgment of 19 December 2017 [Internet].

14. Ministry of Health of Ukraine. (2024). 977 Ukrainians received free infertility treatment, 368 became pregnant. [Internet]. URL: https://unn.ua/en/news/977-ukrainians-received-free-infertility-treatment-368-became-pregnant-ministry-of-health.

15. Paramonov NV. (2023). Reproductive rights in Ukraine and neighboring states: constitutional study. PhD thesis. Uzhhorod National University: 198.

16. Shchyrba MYu. (2017). The patient's right to reproductive technologies: legal dimension. Bulletin of NTUU "KPI". Political Science. Sociology. Law. 3/4(35/36): 146-150.

17. Slinko TM. (2024). Prohibition of inhuman and degrading treatment as a guarantee of reproductive human rights: legal positions of the European Court of Human Rights. Pravo.ua. 4: 22-27.

18. Tsebenko S. (2025). Reproductive rights and freedom of choice in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. Bulletin of Lviv Polytechnic National University. Series: Legal Sciences. 1(45): 266-273. https://doi.org/10.23939/law2025.45.266

19. Ukraine. Fundamentals of the Legislation of Ukraine on Health Care: Law of Ukraine [Internet]. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2801-12#Text.

20. Ukraine, On State Financial Guarantees of Medical Care for the Population: Law of Ukraine [Internet].. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2168-19#Text.

21. UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. General Recommendations [Internet]. [Internet]. URL: https://ukraine.unwomen.org/uk/digital-library/publications/2023/09/zaklyuchni-zauvazhennya-komitetu-oon-z-likvidatsiyi-dyskryminatsiyi-shchodo-zhinok-do-devyatoyi-periodychnoyi-dopovidi-ukrayiny.

22. United Nations. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women [Internet]. URL: https://www.un.org.

23. United States. (2021). National Strategy on Gender Equity and Equality [Internet]. URL: https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/National-Strategy-on-Gender-Equity-and-Equality.pdf.

24. Ventskivska IB, Deshko LM, Lotiuk OS, Vasylchenko OP, Narytnik TT. (2022). Mandatory vaccination of medical personnel against Covid-19: European standards of its introduction. Reproductive Endocrinology. 65: 108-112. https://doi.org/10.18370/2309-4117.2022.65.108-112

25. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (1996). Constitution of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine [Internet]. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text.

26. World Health Organization. NLiS Country Profile: Ukraine [Internet]. URL: https://apps.who.int/nutrition/landscape/report.aspx?goButton=Go&iso=UKR&rid=1620.

27. World Health Organization. Women's Health Overview [Internet]. URL: https://www.who.int/health-topics/women-s-health.

28. Zagel H (ed). (2024). Reproduction Policy in the Twenty-First Century: A Comparative Analysis. Cheltenham, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035324163