• Psychological culture of women as a factor of professional self-realization in wartime conditions
en To content Full text of article

Psychological culture of women as a factor of professional self-realization in wartime conditions

Journal Health of Woman. 2026. 3(184): 148-158. doi: 10.15574/HW.2026.3(184).148158
Afanasenko V. I.1, Romanovska D. D.2, Fedorova I. V.3, Pikovets N. V.4, Podorozhnyi V. H.5
1Khmelnitsky National University, Ukraine
2Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University, Ukraine
3Odesa State Agrarian University, Ukraine
4Private institution «Institute of higher education International Humanitarian and Pedagogical Institute «Beit Khana», Dnipro, Ukraine
5Mykhailo Kotsyubynsky Vinnytsia State Pedagogical University, Ukraine.

For citation: Afanasenko VI, Romanovska DD, Fedorova IV, Pikovets NV, Podorozhnyi VH. (2026). Psychological culture of women as a factor of professional self-realization in wartime conditions. Ukrainian Journal Health of Woman. 3(184): 148-158. doi: 10.15574/HW.2026.3(184).148158
Article received: Jan 24, 2026. Accepted for publication: Jun 01, 2026.

The psychological culture of women is a key internal resource that determines their ability to successfully realize themselves professionally in conditions of specific and crisis challenges, such as martial law. The present is determined by the social difficulties that Ukrainian society has encountered. Significant changes are taking place in the social roles and professional trajectories of women. Psychological culture is becoming a dynamic system with intellectual, emotional, motivational and social components. The structure of psychological culture consists of psychological literacy, competence, value-semantic aspects, self-reflection skills and the ability to engage in cultural activities.
Aim – to conduct a theoretical analysis of scientific sources that characterize the psychological culture of women as a factor of professional self-realization in wartime conditions.
Professional self-realization is influenced by a combination of internal (personal) and external (socio-psychological) factors. The key internal conditions are motivation for self-improvement, adequate self-esteem, clear value orientations and psychological stability. External conditions create a favorable moral and psychological climate in the work team, opportunities to show initiative, practical provision of gender equality in the professional environment.
The motivational space of women in the context of a war situation is changing. High psychological culture helps to preserve professional identity even in conditions of forced migration, loss of job or the need to master new occupations in the areas of volunteering or public activity. A developed psychological culture is not only the basis of women's personal success, but also an important social resource for the post-war reconstruction of the country.
The authors declare the absence of a conflict of interest.
Keywords: psychological culture, professional self-realization, women, martial law conditions, psychological stability, adaptation, motivation, personal resource, value orientations, resilience.

REFERENCES

1. Halaz L, Bespaliuk Kh, Ivaniuk U. (2023). Osoblyvosti samorealizatsii zhinok: podolannia hendernykh rozryviv. Naukovi zapysky Lvivskoho universytetu biznesu ta prava. Seriia «Ekonomichna». Seriia «Yurydychna». 38: 361-369.

2. Hlavatska OL. (2008). Osnovy samovykhovannia osobystosti. Kyiv: Kondor: 206.

3. Hrabovska I. (2022). Zhinoche «oblychchia» viiny Ukrainy proty rosiiskoho ahresora. Ukrainoznavchyi almanakh. Naukove periodychne vydannia. 30: 29-34. https://doi.org/10.17721/2520-2626/2022.30.4

4. Hryshchenko SV. (2009). Samovykhovannia osobystosti. Monohrafiia. Chernihiv: Chernihivskyi derzhavnyi pedahohichnyi universytet imeni TH. Shevchenka: 252.

5. Hryshchenko SV. (2011). Samovdoskonalennia maibutnikh fakhivtsiv sotsialnoi sfery. Monohrafiia. Chernihiv: ChNPU: 328.

6. Hryshchenko SV. (2019). Samovdoskonalennia osobystosti. Monohrafiia. Chernihiv, Vydavnytstvo «Desna Polihraf»: 192.

7. Kapitsa VF. (2015). Tvorcha samorealizatsiia ta uspikh u profesiinii diialnosti. Kryvyi Rih: Vydav. tsentr DVNZ «KNU». 3: 745.

8. Karamushka LM. (2024). Psykhichne zdorovia osobystosti pid chas viiny: yak yoho zberehty ta pidtrymaty. Metod. rek. Kyiv: In-t psykholohii im. HS. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy: 48. URL: https://surl.li/legfkh.

9. Karamushka TV. (2015). Profesiina kariera osobystosti: sutnist, osnovni vydy ta funktsii. Teoretychni i prykladni problemy psykholohii. 1: 181-190. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Tippp_2015_1_26.

10. Kharchenko O. (2023). Psykholohichnyi vplyv viiny na zhinok v Ukraini. Kyiv: Psykholohiia: 98-143.

11 Kliuiko LF. (2018). Teoretyko-metodolohichnyi analiz fenomenu zadovolenosti yakistiu zhyttia yak umovy rozvytku profesiinoi ya-kontseptsii osobystosti. Psykholohichni perspektyvy. 32: 135-148. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Ppst_2018_32_14. https://doi.org/10.29038/2227-1376-2018-32-135-148

12. Kolmohorova LS. (2001). Osoblyvosti stanovlennia psykholohichnoi kultury molodshykh shkoliariv. Pytannia psykholohii. 1: 47-56.

13. Mahda P. (2022). Do tlumachennia poniattia «tsinnisni oriientatsii». Innovatsiina pedahohika. 53; 2: 89-92. https://doi.org/10.32782/2663-6085/2022/53.2.18

14. Marchenko O. (2020). Psykholohichni umovy profesiinoi samorealizatsii osobystosti u sportyvnii sferi diialnosti. Naukovi zapysky Natsionalnoho universytetu «Ostrozka akademiia». Seriia «Psykholohiia». 11: 4-7.

15. Motkov OI. (1999). Psykholohichna kultura osobystosti. Shkilnyi psykholoh. 8: 14-16.

16. Navrotska OS, Orap MO. (2025). Psykholohichni umovy samorealizatsii zhinok u hromadskykh orhanizatsiiakh. Naukovi zapysky. Seriia: Psykholohiia. 3: 73-79. https://doi.org/10.32782/cusu-psy-2025-3-10

17. Proshko M, Hirchenko O. (2023). Psykholohichni umovy samorealizatsii liudei serednoho viku. Kvalifikatsiina robota mahistra. Chernihiv: NU «Chernihivskyi kolehium» im. TH. Shevchenka: 74.

18. Prus A. (2016). Katehoriinyi analiz poniat «samorealizatsiia» ta «profesiina samorealizatsiia». Pedahohichnyi dyskurs. 20: 149-153.

19. Romanchuk O. Psykholohichna stiikist v umovakh viiny: indyvidualnyi ta natsionalnyi vymir. URL: https://i-cbt.org.ua/resilience_ukraine/.

20. Rozina I. (2023). Osobystisni ta emotsiini determinanty rozvytku psykhichnoho zdorovia studentiv. Perspektyvy ta innovatsii nauky. 4(22): 510-520. URL: http://perspectives.pp.ua/index.php/pis/article/view/3759/3779.

21. Sedykh K, Komisova T, Herasymova U. (2025). Psykhoemotsiini stany zhinok v umovakh viiny. Visnyk KhNPU imeni HS. Skovorody «Psykholohiia». 73: 299. https://doi.org/10.34142/23129387.2025.73.19

22. Shpak M. (2020). Psykholohichna kontseptsiia rozvytku emotsiinoho intelektu osobystosti v ontohenezi. Naukovyi chasopys NPU imeni MP. Drahomanova. 10 (55): 125-134.

23. Sushyk I, Sushyk O. (2021). Moralno-psykholohichnyi ta psykhoemotsiinyi stan orhanizatsii yak pokaznyk yakosti menedzhmentu. Menedzhment ta pidpryiemnytstvo v Ukraini: etapy stanovlennia i problemy rozvytku. 2 (6): 106-120.

24. Syniavskyi V, Serhieienkova O, Pobirchenko N. (2007). Psykholohichnyi slovnyk. Kyiv: Naukovyi svit: 274.

25. Tutushkina MK. (2016). Praktychna psykholohiia dlia vykladachiv. Kyiv: Tsentr uchbovoi literatury: 280.

26. Volovets S, Kantsir V. (2023). U viiny – zhinoche oblychchia. Modernizatsiia ta suchasni ukrainski i svitovi naukovi doslidzhennia. Materialy konf. MNL (3 berez. 2023 r., m. Kherson): 74-76.

27. Yevchenko IM. (2022). Emotsiinyi stan ukraintsiv pid chas rosiisko-ukrainskoi viiny. Psykholohichni vymiry osobystisnoi vzaiemodii subiektiv osvitnoho prostoru v konteksti humanistychnoi paradyhmy. Zbirnyk tez V Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. (Kyiv, 22 kvit. 2022 r.). Kyiv: 45-49.