• Non-invasive diagnostic tests as a screening method for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease in pregnant women
en To content Full text of article

Non-invasive diagnostic tests as a screening method for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease in pregnant women

Journal Health of Woman. 2026. 2(183): 10-19. doi: 10.15574/HW.2026.2(183).1019
Prilutska A. B., Solovyova G. A., Ostashevska V. S., Salata Y. V., Kharchenko S. T., Govsіeіev D. O.
Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine

For citation: Prilutska AB, Solovyova GA, Ostashevska VS, Salata YV, Kharchenko ST, Govsіeіev DO. (2026). Non-invasive diagnostic tests as a screening method for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease in pregnant women. Ukrainian Journal Health of Woman. 2(183): 10-19. doi: 10.15574/HW.2026.2(183).1019
Article received: Dec 16, 2025. Accepted for publication: Mar 22, 2026.

Aim – to assess the possibilities of comprehensive application of non-invasive ultrasound diagnostic methods (quantitative steatometry and two-dimensional shear wave elastography – 2D-SWE) in the detection and staging of liver steatosis and fibrosis in pregnant women with cardiometabolic risk factors to optimize early screening of metabolically associated steatosis in obstetric practice
Materials and methods. A comprehensive examination of 76 pregnant women in the second half of gestation was conducted. The patients were divided into two groups: Group I (main) – 46 pregnant women with a complicated somatic history (obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, gestational diabetes mellitus, hypertension, preeclampsia, dyslipidemia); Group II (control) – 30 healthy women with a physiological course of pregnancy. The study was carried out on a Samsung Medison V7 ultrasound device using innovative technologies for quantitative assessment of steatosis (QUS) by tissue attenuation (TAI), tissue scattering (TSI) and fat fraction percentage, as well as parenchymal stiffness using 2D-SWE (S-Shearwave Imaging) with determination of fibrosis stages according to the METAVIR scale.
Results. Conventional ultrasound in B-mode demonstrated low sensitivity, not revealing pathology in 23.9% of patients in the main group. However, according to steatometry, mild steatosis (S1) was verified in all 46 pregnant women in group I. Using elastography (2D-SWE), against the background of steatosis, grade I fibrosis was detected in 71.8% (33 people) of the main group, grade II fibrosis in 13.0% (6 people), and fibrotic changes were absent in 15.2% (7 people). A clear dependence of fibrosis progression on the comorbid profile was established: stage F2 was recorded exclusively in the combination of hypertension with dyslipidemia or grade III obesity with preeclampsia.
Conclusions. The introduction of non-invasive methods (steatometry and elastography) in early gestation in pregnant women with metabolic risk factors is a pathogenetically justified screening tool. A multiparametric approach in early pregnancy provides accurate staging of MASLD and latent fibrosis, which allows for timely optimization of pregnancy, labor and postpartum management to reduce obstetric and perinatal complications.
The study was performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent of women was obtained for the study.
The authors declare no conflict of interest
Keywords: metabolically associated steatotic liver disease, steatometry, two-dimensional shear wave elastography, hepatic steatosis, hepatic fibrosis, non-invasive diagnostic tests, pregnancy.

REFERENCES

1. Bahnii LV, Heriak SM, Bahnii NI. (2020). Patohenetychni aspekty formuvannia akusherskykh uskladnen u vahitnykh iz nealkoholnoiu zhyrovoiu khvoroboiu pechinky pry nadlyshkovii masi tila. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats asotsiatsii akusher-hinekolohiv Ukrainy «Aktualni pytannia pediatrii, akusherstva ta hinekolohii». 2: 37-44. https://doi.org/10.35278/2664-0767.1(47).2021.242659

2. Ballestri S, Zona S, Targher G, Romagnoli D, Baldelli E, Nascimbeni F et al. (2016). Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is associated with an almost twofold increased risk of incident type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome. Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 31: 936-944. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.13264; PMid:26667191

3. Barr RG, Ferraioli G, Palmeri ML, Goodman ZD, Garcia-Tsao G, Rubin J et al. (2015, Sep). Elastography Assessment of Liver Fibrosis: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference Statement. Radiology. 276(3): 845-861. Epub 2015 Jun 16. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015150619; PMid:26079489 PMCid:PMC12306495

4. Chakravarthy MV, Siddiqui MS, Forsgren MF, Sanyal AJ. (2020). Harnessing muscle-liver crosstalk to treat nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Front Endocrinol. 11: 592373. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.592373; PMid:33424768 PMCid:PMC7786290

5. De Lorenzo А, Soldati L, Sarlo F, Calvani M. (2016). New obesity classification criteria as a tool for bariatric surgery indication. World J. Gastroenterol. 22(2): 681-703. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.681; PMid:26811617 PMCid:PMC4716069

6. Dinnyk OB, Lynskaia AV, Kobiliak NN. (2014). Cdvyhovovolnovaia elastohrafyia y elastometryia parenkhymi pecheny (metodycheskye aspekti). Promeneva diahnostyka, promeneva terapiia. 1-2: 73-82.

7. Dowman JW, Tomlinson JW, Newsome PN. (2010). Pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. QJM. 103: 71-83. Epub 2009 Nov 13. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcp158; PMid:19914930 PMCid:PMC2810391

8. Dynnik OB, Fedusenko AA, Kobyliak NN y dr. (2016). 6 yzmerenyi ultrazvukovoi dyahnostyky dyffuvnykh zabolevanyi pecheny, yly multyparametrycheskyi ultrazvuk. Promeneva diahnostyka, promeneva terapiia. 3-4: 69-84

9. EASL, EASD, EASO. (2024, Sep). EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Journal of Hepatology. 81: 492-542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2024.04.031; PMid:38851997

10. European Association for the Study of the Liver et al. (2024). EASL-EASD-EASO clinical practice guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Obes Facts. 17(4): 374-444. https://doi.org/10.1159/000539371; PMid:38852583 PMCid:PMC11299976

11. European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL); European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD); European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO). (2016). EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 64: 1388-1402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2015.11.004; PMid:27062661 PMCid:PMC9904363

12. Fazel Y, Koenig AB, Sayiner M, Goodman ZD, Younossi ZM. (2016). Epidemiology and natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Metabolism. 65(8): 1017-1025. Epub 2016 Jan 29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2016.01.012; PMid:26997539

13. Ferraioli G, Tinelli C, Lissandrin R, Zicchetti M, Dal Bello B et al. (2014, Apr 28). Point shear wave elastography method for assessing liver stiffness. World J Gastroenterol. 20(16): 4787-4796. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i16.4787; PMid:24782633 PMCid:PMC4000517

14. Ferraioli G, Wong VW, Castera L, Berzigotti A, Sporea I, Dietrich CF et al. (2018, Dec). Liver Ultrasound Elastography: An Update to the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology Guidelines and Recommendations. Ultrasound Med Biol. 44(12): 2419-2440. Epub 2018 Sep 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.07.008; PMid:30209008

15. Gotteland M, Magne F. (2017). Alterations in human milk leptin and insulin are associated with early changes in the infant intestinal microbiome. Am J Clin Nutr. 105(1): 234. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.116.140129; PMid:28049664 PMCid:PMC5183729

16. Gross A, Lange M, Rosenbluth E, Carroll C, Sperling R, Juliano C et al. (2023). Evaluation of 2-year outcomes in infants born to mothers with and without NAFLD in pregnancy. Eur J Pediatr. 182(8): 3765-3774. Epub 2023 Jun 13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-023-05044-7; PMid:37310499 PMCid:PMC12166767

17. Hagstrom H, Vessby J, Ekstedt M, Shang Y. (2024). 99% of patients with NAFLD meet MASLD criteria and natural history is therefore identical. J Hepatol. 80(2): e76-e77. Epub 2023 Sep 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2023.08.026; PMid:37678723

18. Hamaguchi M, Kojima T, Itoh Y, Amakawa Y, Asakura M, Sakamoto T et al. (2007). Estimation of fatty liver as a risk factor for metabolic syndrome in a general population. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 102(5): 990-997. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01526.x; PMid:17894848

19. Hsu C, Caussy C, Imajo K, Chen J, Singh S, Kaulback K et al. (2019, Mar). Magnetic Resonance vs Transient Elastography Analysis of Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Individual Participants. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 17(4): 630-637.e8. Epub 2018 Jun 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2018.05.059; PMid:29908362 PMCid:PMC6294709

20. Jeon SK. (2022). Quantitative US (QUS) for assessing hepatic steatosis in NAFLD, Seoul National University Hospital. Samsung Medison White Paper: 1-12.

21. Jeon SK, Lee JM, Joo I, Park SJ. (2021, Jul). Quantitative Ultrasound Radiofrequency Data Analysis for the Assessment of Hepatic Steatosis in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Proton Density Fat Fraction as the Reference Standard. Korean J Radiol. 22(7): 1077-1086. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.1262; PMid:33739636 PMCid:PMC8236371

22. Kahn CR, Wang G, Lee KY. (2019). Altered adipose tissue and adipocyte function in the pathogenesis of metabolic syndrome. J Clin Invest. 129: 3990-4000. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI129187; PMid:31573548 PMCid:PMC6763230

23. Kanwal F, Shubrook JH, Younossi Z, Natarajan Y, Bugianesi E, Rinella ME et al. (2021, Sep). Preparing for the NASH epidemic: a call to action. Gastroenterology. 161(3): 1030-1042.е8. Epub 2021 Jul 26. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2021.04.074; PMid:34416976

24. Lao TT. (2020, Oct). Implications of abnormal liver function in pregnancy and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 68: 2-11. Epub 2020 Mar 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.02.011; PMid:32312689

25. Lee SS, Park SH, Kim HJ, Kim SY, Kim M-Y, Kim DY et al. (2010). Non invasive assessment of hepatic steatosis: Prospective comparison of the accuracy of imaging examinations. Journal of Hepatology. 52(4): 579-585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2010.01.008; PMid:20185194

26. Marcellin P, Kutala BK. (2018, Feb). Liver diseases: A major, neglected global public health problem requiring urgent actions and large-scale screening. Liver Int. 38; Suppl 1: 2-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.13682; PMid:29427496

27. Mintser AP. (2018). Statisticheskie metodyi issledovaniya v klinicheskoy meditsine. Prakticheskaya meditsina. 3: 41-45.

28. Park J, Lee JM, Lee G, Jeon SK, Joo I. (2022, Jan). Quantitative Evaluation of Hepatic Steatosis Using Advanced Imaging Techniques: Focusing on New Quantitative Ultrasound Techniques. Korean J Radiol. 23(1): 13-29. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2021.0112; PMid:34983091 PMCid:PMC8743150

29. Рrуlutska AB, Solovyova GA, Martynova LI, Kisilenko ОL, Tsema TА, Govsіeіev DО. (2025). Obstetric aspects of metabolically associated steatotic liver disease. Ukrainian Journal of Perinatology and Pediatrics. 2(102): 87-96. https://doi.org/10.15574/PP.2025.2(102).8796

30. Рrуlutska AB, Solovyova GA, Ostashevska VS, Ilienko AV, Govsіeіev DО. (2026). Elastography as a screening method for fibrosis in metabolic-associated steatosis during pregnancy. Ukrainian Journal Health of Woman. 1(182): 10-19. https://doi.org/10.15574/HW.2026.1(182).1019

31. Sanders FWB, Acharjee A, Walker C, Marney L, Roberts LD, Imamura F et al. (2018). Hepatic steatosis risk is partly driven by increased de novo lipogenesis following carbohydrate consumption. Genome Biol. 19: 79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-018-1439-8; PMid:29925420 PMCid:PMC6009819

32. Sarkar M, Kushner T. (2025). Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and pregnancy. J Clin Invest. 135(10): e186426. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI186426; PMid:40371643 PMCid:PMC12077888

33. Sasso M, Beaugrand M, de Ledinghen V et al. (2010, Nov). Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP): a novel VCTE™ guided ultrasonic attenuation measurement for the evaluation of hepatic steatosis: preliminary study and validation in a cohort of patients with chronic liver disease from various causes. Ultrasound Med Biol. 36(11): 1825-1835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.07.005; PMid:20870345

34. Stepanov YuM, Gravirovska NH, Lukianenko OYu. (2017). Steatometry and elastometry as methods of noninvasive diagnostics of pancreatic steatosis and fibrosis in children. Gastroenterologìa. 51(2): 106-110. https://doi.org/10.22141/2308-2097.51.2.2017.101699

35. Stoikevych MV, Konenko IS, Nedzvetska NV. (2018). Vikovi osoblyvosti stanu pechinky u khvorykh na khronichni zapalni zakhvoriuvannia kyshechnyka za danymy steatometrii ta zsuvnokhvylovoi elastometrii. Hastroenterolohiia. 52(2): 77-82. https://doi.org/10.22141/2308-2097.52.2.2018.132612

36. Terrault NA, Williamson C. (2022, Jul). Pregnancy-Associated Liver Diseases. Gastroenterology. 163(1): 97-117.e1. Epub 2022 Mar 8. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2022.01.060; PMid:35276220

37. Yoo HW, Kim SG, Jang JY, Yoo JJ, Jeong SW et al. (2022, Mar). Two-dimensional shear wave elastography for assessing liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease: a prospective cohort study. Korean J Intern Med. 37(2): 285-293. Epub 2021 Dec 7. https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2020.635; PMid:34865414 PMCid:PMC8925940