1

MEDICAL PUBLICATION
CONFERENCES AND SEMINARS
MARKETING RESEARCH

  • Nakayama esophagoduodenostomy as a reconstructive stage after gastrectomy for gastric cancer complicated by acute bleeding and Krukenberg metastases. Clinical case
en To content Full text of article

Nakayama esophagoduodenostomy as a reconstructive stage after gastrectomy for gastric cancer complicated by acute bleeding and Krukenberg metastases. Clinical case

Paediatric Surgery (Ukraine).2023.2(79):105-110; doi 10.15574/PS.2023.79.105
Ivanchov P. V., Hychka S. H., Prudnikova O. B., Peresh Ye. Ye.
Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine

For citation: Ivanchov PV, Hychka SH, Prudnikova OB, Peresh YeYe. (2023). Nakayama esophagoduodenostomy as a reconstructive stage after gastrectomy for gastric cancer complicated by acute bleeding and Krukenberg metastases. Clinical case. Paediatric Surgery (Ukraine). 2(79): 105-110. doi: 10.15574/PS.2023.79.105.
Article received: Mar 04, 2023. Accepted for publication: Jun 14, 2023.

Purpose – on a clinical case to justify the technical aspects of applying the Nakayama esophago-duodenostomy as a reconstructive stage after gastrectomy for gastric cancer complicated by acute bleeding and Krukenberg metastases.
Clinical case. Patient O., born in 1975, was being treated for stomach cancer complicated by moderate acute bleeding and Krukenberg metastases in the surgery department No. 3 of the Kyiv City Emergency Clinical Hospital. The patient general clinical, special laboratory and instrumental research methods were carried out (electrocardiography, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, ultrasound examination of the organs of the abdominal cavity and small pelvis, computer tomography of the organs of the abdominal cavity and small pelvis with intravenous contrast).
The patient had cancer of the cardiac part of the stomach, complicated by moderate gastrointestinal bleeding with the presence of Krukenberg metastases, in connection with which the patient underwent surgery in the early delayed period according to a unique method – gastrectomy with lymphodissection in the volume of D2+ and overlapping esophageal-duodenal anastomosis according to the Nakayama type in the modification of the clinic. The patient was discharged in a satisfactory condition on the 10th day after surgery under the supervision of an oncologist and a surgeon at her place of residence. During the dynamic observation for 12 months, she felt satisfactory.
Conclusions. Using the example of a clinical case, the technical aspects of applying the Nakayama esophagoduodenostomy as a reconstructive stage after gastrectomy for gastric cancer complicated by acute bleeding and Krukenberg metastases are substantiated.
The research was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. The informed consent of the patient was obtained for conducting the studies.
No conflict of interests was declared by the authors.
Keywords: stomach cancer, bleeding, gastrectomy, esophagoduodenoanastomosis.

REFERENCES

1. Chen S, Li YF, Feng XY et al. (2012, Dec). Significance of palliative gastrectomy for late-stage gastric cancer patients. J Surg Oncol. 106 (7): 862-71. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23158; PMid:22648960

2. Choi YY, Noh SH, Cheong JH. (2015, Sep). Evolution of gastric cancer treatment: from the golden age of surgery to an era of precision medicine. Yonsei Med J. 56 (5): 1177-1185. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2015.56.5.1177; PMid:26256958 PMCid:PMC4541645

3. Cowling J, Gorman B, Riaz A, Bundred JR, Kamarajah SK, Evans RPT et al. (2021). Peri-operative outcomes and survival following palliative gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Cancer. 52 (1): 41-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-020-00519-4; PMid:32959118 PMCid:PMC7900337

4. Fedorenko ZP, Hulak LO, Mykhailovych YuI ta in. (2021). Rak v Ukraini, 2019-2020. Zakhvoriuvanist, smertnist, pokaznyky diialnosti onkolohichnoi sluzhby, Biul. nats. kantser-reiestru Ukrainy. 22: 123.

5. Li J. (2020, Mar 2). Gastric cancer in young adults: A different clinical entity from carcinogenesis to prognosis. gastroenterol Res Pract: 9512707. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9512707; PMid:32190044 PMCid:PMC7071806

6. Marano L, Polom K, Patriti A et al. (2016, Jan). Surgical management of advanced gastric cancer: An evolving issue. Eur J Surg Oncol. 42 (1): 18-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2015.10.016; PMid:26632080

7. Price TJ, Shapiro JD, Segelov E et al. (2012, Apr). Management of advanced gastric cancer. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 6 (2): 199-208; quiz 209. https://doi.org/10.1586/egh.11.103; PMid:22375525

8. Shiozaki H, Shimodaira Y, Elimova E, Wadhwa R, Sudo K, Harada K et al. (2016). Evolution of gastric surgery techniques and outcomes. Chin J Cancer. 35 (1): 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40880-016-0134-y; PMid:27460019 PMCid:PMC4962398

9. Thakur B, Devkota M, Sharma A. (2019, Aug 4). Evidence based surgical approach to locally advanced gastric cancer. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 17 (2): 133-140. https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v0i0.2055; PMid:31455923

10. Wang SY, Hsu CH, Liao CH, Fu CY, Ouyang CH, Cheng CT et al. (2017). Surgical outcome evaluation of perforated gastric cancer: from the aspects of both acute care surgery and surgical oncology. Scand J Gastroenterol. 52 (12): 1371-1376. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2017.1369562; PMid:28838270

11. Yuldoshev RZ. (2010). Khyrurhycheskoe lechenye nekotorikh oslozhnennikh y rasprostranennikh form raka zheludka. Avtoreferat dyssertatsyy. Byshkek: Kirhizsko-ros. slavian. un-t: 45.