• Modern approaches to diagnosing the course of the wound process in parturient women with obstetric surgical wound infection
en To content Full text of article

Modern approaches to diagnosing the course of the wound process in parturient women with obstetric surgical wound infection

Journal Health of Woman. 2024. 6(175): 37-42. doi: 10.15574/HW.2024.6(175).3742

Рrуlutska A. B., Avramenko S. O., Kisilenko О. L., Govsіeіev D. О.
Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine

For citation: Рrуlutska AB, Avramenko SO, Kisilenko ОL, Govsіeіev DО. (2024). Modern approaches to diagnosing the course of the wound process in parturient women with obstetric surgical wound infection. Ukrainian Journal Health of Woman. 6(175): 37-42. doi: 10.15574/HW.2024.6(175).3742
Article received: Sep 09, 2024. Accepted for publication: Nov 27, 2024.

Aim – to determine the possibility of using the method of polarization microscopy in diagnosing the course of the wound process in women in labor with infection of the obstetric surgical wound.
Materials and methods. 115 women in labor with purulent wounds were examined and treated. The course of the wound process was determined by the method of polarization microscopy by studying the structure of biological media (blood, wound exudate) and the substrate – biopsy from the wound in the solid phase, which were taken before, during treatment, and after it for 2-3 days. To determine the method of polarization microscopy as a diagnostic criterion for the course of the wound process, the results were obtained and compared with the results of clinical, bacteriological, immunological, histological and cytological research methods. Statistical data processing was carried out using the application program package "Microsoft Excel 5.0" and the standard version of "Statistica 8.0". The difference in indicators was recognized as statistically significant at p<0.05.
Results. Using the method of polarization microscopy, together with clinical, bacteriological, immunological, histological and cytological research methods, pathogenetic changes in the body of women with purulent wounds in parturient women were explained, clinical manifestations of wound infection were characterized, the course of the wound process was assessed, and the restoration of tissue in the wound to its original functional state was shown.
Conclusions. The method of polarization microscopy can be used in clinical practice as an objective criterion of the course of the wound process and the effectiveness of treatment for infected surgical wounds in obstetric practice.
The study was performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of the institution specified in the work. Informed consent of the patients was obtained for the research.
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Keywords: obstetrics, obstetric surgical wound infection, purulent-septic complications, sorbents, treatment, immunomodulators, polarization microscopy method.
REFERENCES

1. Asmolov AK, Holovataia YM, Kurik MV, Lobenko AA, Tyshchenko VH y dr. (1992). Zhydkye krystalli v morskoi medytsyne. Pod red. A.A. Lobenko. K.: Nauk. dumka: 96.

2. Avramenko NV. (2014). Vospalytelnie zabolevanyia orhanov maloho taza u zhenshchyn kak vedushchyi faktor formyrovanyia trubno-perytonealnoho besplodyia. Zaporozhskyi medytsynskyi zhurnal. 4: 63-68.

3. Kurik MV. (1991). Mytselliarnost y fraktalnie klasteri byolohycheskykh struktur. Yzv. AN SSSR. 55; 9: 1798-1803.

4. Makarenko MV, Govseev DA, Popovskiy АS. (2015). Value of urogenital infection for preparation to pregnancy in fertile age woman. Health of woman. 1(97): 118-121. doi: 10.15574/HW.2015.97.118.

5. Mintser AP. (2018). Statisticheskie metodyi issledovaniya v klinicheskoy meditsine. Prakticheskaya meditsina. 3: 41-45.

6. Ozel A, Alici Davutoglu E, Yurtkal A, Madazli R. (2020). How do platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio change in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes, and threaten preterm labour? J Obstet Gynaecol. 40(2): 195-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2019.1621807; PMid:31475592

7. Pei C, Kim Y, Baek K. (2019). Pathogenetic factors involved in recurrent pregnancy loss from multiple aspects.Obstet Gynecol Sci. 62(4): 212-223. https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2019.62.4.212; PMid:31338338 PMCid:PMC6629979

8. Postolov PM, Bыkov AV, Myshyn SH. (1990). Yssledovanye krystallycheskykh struktur zhelchy v dyahnostyke zhelchnokamennoi bolezny. Vestn. khyrurhyy ym. Y.Y. Hrekova. 10: 22-25.

9. Prylutska AB. (2003). Porivnialna otsinka metodiv likuvannia hniinykh ran v akusherskii praktytsi. Dysert. … kand. med. n. Kyiv: 170.

10. Рrуlutska AB, Martynova LI, Avramenko SO, Kisilenko ОL, Govsіeіev DО. (2024). Cytological and morphological predictors of complex treatment of obstetric surgical wound infection in women in labor. Ukrainian Journal Health of Woman. 1(170): 19-25. https://doi.org/10.15574/HW.2024.170.19

11. Рrуlutska AB, Martynova LI, Avramenko SO, Yaroshchuk OB, Pavliuchenko KS, Govsіeіev DО. (2023). The state of general immunity in women in labor with purulent wounds during hostilities. Ukrainian Journal of Perinatology and Pediatrics. 4(96): 44-49. https://doi.org/10.15574/PP.2023.96.44

12. Рrуlutska AB, Martynova LI, Kisilenko ОL, Govsіeіev DО. (2024). The state of general immunity in women in labor with purulent wounds during hostilities. Ukrainian Journal of Perinatology and Pediatrics. 2(98): 55-59. https://doi.org/10.15574/PP.2024.98.55

13. Romanenko TG, Krotik OM, Mitina OL. (2019). Reproductive health of married couple with urogenital infections in anamnesis (Literature review). Health of woman. 4(140): 82-91. https://doi.org/10.15574/HW.2019.140.82

14. Romashchenko OV, Yakovenko LF, Mironenko NA. (2015). In flammatory diseases of organs of small pelvis in sexually active teenage girls as a reason for the disorder of reproductive function in women of fertile age. Health of woman. 6(102): 167-171. doi: 10.15574/HW.2015.102.167.

15. Schumacher A, Costa SD, Zenclussen AC. (2014, May 8). Endocrine factors modulating immune responses in pregnancy. Front Immunol. 5: 196. PMID: 24847324; PMCID: PMC4021116. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2014.00196

16. Sel G. (2020). Perinatal Infections. In: Pract. Guid. to Oral Exams Obstet. Gynecol. Springer International Publishing. Cham: 45-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29669-8_7

17. Shahshahan Z, Hashemi L. (2014). Maternal serum cytokines in predicting preterm labour and response to tocolytic therapy in preterm labour women. Adv Biomed Res. 3: 126. https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.133243; PMid:24949297 PMCid:PMC4063106

18. Thinkhamrpop J, Hofmeyr J, Adetoro O, Lumbiganon P, Ota E. (2015). Antibiotic prophylaxis during the second and third trimester to reduce adverse pregnancy outcomes and morbidity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 26; 1: CD002250. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002250.pub2

19. Verner IIe. (2018). Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy. Za redaktsiieiu I.Ye. Vernera. K: 241.

20. Zhylka NIa, Shcherbivska OS, Netskar IP. (2023). Sytuatsiinyi analiz problem materynskoi smertnosti v Ukraini ta shliakhy yii vyrishennia. Reproduktyvne zdorovia zhinky. 4: 7-13. https://doi.org/10.30841/2708-8731.4.2023.285759