Paediatric Surgery (Ukraine). 2025. 1(86): 73-78. doi: 10.15574/PS.2025.1(86).7378
Nakonechnyi Y. A.
Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Ukraine

For citation: Nakonechnyi YA. (2025). Intracorporeal square-to-slip knot technique for vesicourethral anastomosis with single-layer anatomical reconstruction and anterior urethral sphincter preservation. Paediatric Surgery (Ukraine). 1(86): 73-78. doi: 10.15574/PS.2025.1(86).7378.
Article received: Oct 18, 2024. Accepted for publication: Mar 18, 2025.

Radical prostatectomy (RP) remains the gold standard for prostate cancer (PCa) treatment. In recent years, the number of RP procedures has increased, alongside the number of high-risk PCa (HR-PCa) patients choosing this treatment. Consequently, improving functional outcomes while maintaining oncological safety is crucial for this patient group. The rapid development of minimally invasive RP methods has yielded promising new techniques and approaches. However, vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA) continues to be one of the most sophisticated and challenging aspects of the operation.
Aim: to describe and evaluate the safety and efficacy of a VUA technique using intracorporeal square-to-slip knots (IKS), single-layer anatomical reconstruction (SLAR), and anterior smooth muscle urethral sphincter preservation (AUS-P) during extraperitoneoscopic RP (ERP) in terms of urinary continence (UC).
Materials and methods. This study included 36 patients with localized HR-PCa who underwent ERP in 2022 and 2023. The bladder neck preservation (BNP), puboprostatic ligaments (PPL-P), and maximal functional urethra length (MFUL-P), as well as VUA with IKS technique, SLAR and AUS-P, were performed in all cases.
Results. The statistical analysis indicated the safety of the modified VUA technique. The operative time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), and hospital stay (HS) medians were within the expected range. Only 15% of patients experienced postoperative complications, all of which were classified as grade I according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. No VUA stenosis was observed after 12 months. 80.6% of patients achieved UC within the first 3 months after urethral catheter removal (CR).
Conclusions. The ISK technique for VUA with SLAR and AUS-P appears to be a safe approach, with promising UC outcomes. Larger studies are needed to confirm the true UC benefits associated with this technique.
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Keywords: prostate cancer, radical prostatectomy, vesicourethral anastomosis, intracorporeal square-to-slip knots, urethral sphincter preservation, single-layer anatomical reconstruction of the vesicourethral anastomosis.
REFERENCES

1. Albisinni S, Limani K, Hawaux E, Peltier A, Van Velthoven R. (2014). Evaluation of the Single-Knot Running Vesicourethral Anastomosis 10 Years After Its Introduction: Results from an International Survey. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 24(9): 640-646. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2014.0129; PMid:25192249

2. Antonelli L, Afferi L, Mattei A, Fankhauser CD. (2023). Anterior Sphincter-sparing Suturing of the Vesicourethral Anastomosis During Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol Open Sci. 52: 109-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2023.04.007; PMid:37213237 PMCid:PMC10192927

3. Asimakopoulos AD, Mugnier C, Hoepffner JL, Piechaud T, Gaston R. (2012) 'Bladder neck preservation during minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: a standardised technique using a lateral approach'. BJU International. 110(10): 1566-1571. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11604.x; PMid:23106764

4. Bianchi L, Turri FM, Larcher A, De Groote R, De Bruyne P, De Coninck V et al. (2018). A Novel Approach for Apical Dissection During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: The "Collar" Technique. Eur Urol Focus. 4(5): 677-685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2018.01.004; PMid:29402756

5. Cathelineau X, Cahill D, Widmer H, Rozet F, Baumert H, Vallancien G et al. (2004). Transperitoneal or Extraperitoneal Approach for Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A False Debate Over a Real Challenge. J Urol. 171(2): 714-716. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000103885.71434.02; PMid:14713793

6. Checcucci E, De Cillis S, Alladio E, Piramide F, Volpi G, Granato S et al. (2024). Ten‐year functional and oncological outcomes of a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic versus robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy. Prostate. 84(9): 832-841. https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.24702; PMid:38572570

7. Covas Moschovas M, Bhat S, Onol FF, Rogers T, Roof S, Mazzone E et al. (2020). Modified Apical Dissection and Lateral Prostatic Fascia Preservation Improves Early Postoperative Functional Recovery in Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Results from a Propensity Score – matched Analysis. Eur Urol. 78(6): 875-884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.041; PMid:32593529

8. Erdogru T, Teber D, Frede T, Marrero R, Hammady A, Seemann Oet al. (2004). Comparison of Transperitoneal and Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Using Match-Pair Analysis. Eur Urol. 46(3): 312-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2004.05.004; PMid:15306100

9. Falagario UG, Knipper S, Pellegrino F, Martini A, Akre O, Egevad Let al. (2024). Prostate Cancer – specific and All-cause Mortality After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: 20 Years' Report from the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group. Eur Urol Oncol. 7(4): 705-712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2023.08.005; PMid:37661459

10. Haga N, Kurita N, Yanagida T, Ogawa S, Yabe M, Akaihata H et al. (2018). Effects of barbed suture during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy on postoperative tissue damage and longitudinal changes in lower urinary tract outcome. Surg Endosc. 32(1): 145-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5649-z; PMid:28643068

11. Hamada A, Razdan S, Etafy MH, Fagin R, Razdan S et al. (2014). Early Return of Continence in Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy Using Modified Maximal Urethral Length Preservation Technique. J Endourol. 28(8): 930-938. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2013.0794; PMid:24739066

12. Lu H, Yu C, Yu X, Yang D, Yu S, Xia L et al. (2024). Effects of Bony Pelvic and Prostate Dimensions on Surgical Difficulty of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: An Original Study and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 31(12): 8405-8420. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-15769-w; PMid:39080137

13. Ippoliti S, Colalillo G, Egbury G, Orecchia L, Fletcher P, Piechaud T et al. (2023). Continence-Sparing Techniques in Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Endourol. 37(10): 1088-1104. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2023.0188; PMid:37597197

14. Köhler N, El-Bandar N, Maxeiner A, Ralla B, Miller K et al. (2020). Early Continence and Extravasation After Open Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy – Interrupted vs Continuous Suturing for Vesicourethral Anastomosis. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 16: 1289-1296. https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S278454; PMid:33380800 PMCid:PMC7767697

15. Martini A, Falagario UG, Villers A, Dell'Oglio P, Mazzone E, Autorino Ret al. (2020). Contemporary Techniques of Prostate Dissection for Robot-assisted Prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 78(4): 583-591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.07.017; PMid:32747200

16. Mazaris EM, Chatzidarellis E, Varkarakis IM, Dellis A, Deliveliotis C. (2009). Reducing the number of sutures for vesicourethral anastomosis in radical retropubic prostatectomy. Int Braz J Urol. 35(2): 158-163. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-55382009000200005; PMid:19409119

17. Meng MV, Stoller ML. (2002). Laparoscopic intracorporeal square-to-slip knot. Urology. 59(6): 932-933. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01517-0; PMid:12031384

18. Michl U, Tennstedt P, Feldmeier L, Mandel P, Oh SJ, Ahyai S et al. (2016). Nerve-sparing Surgery Technique, Not the Preservation of the Neurovascular Bundles, Leads to Improved Long-term Continence Rates After Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 69(4): 584-589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.037; PMid:26277303

19. Nakonechnyi YA, Mytsyk YuO, Borzhievskyi ATs. (2024). PCA3 score prognostic value for identifying postoperative ISUP grades 4-5 in localized peripheral zone prostate cancer with a posterior tumor growth dominant pattern. Paediatric Surgery (Ukraine). 4(85): 65-70. doi: https://doi.org/10.15574/PS.2024.4(85).6570

20. Rajih E, Meskawi M, Alenizi AM, Zorn KC, Alnazari M, Borhan W et al. (2019). Long-term urinary functional outcome of vesicourethral anastomosis with bidirectional poliglecaprone (Monocryl®) vs. barbed polyglyconate suture (V-LocTM 180) in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Can Urol Assoc J. 14(3). https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.5959; PMid:31599716 PMCid:PMC7053370

21. Samavedi S, Abdul-Muhsin H, Pigilam S, Sivaraman A, Patel VR. (2014). Handling difficult anastomosis. Tips and tricks in obese patients and narrow pelvis. Indian J Urol. 30(4): 418. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.142070; PMid:25378824 PMCid:PMC4220382

22. Schlomm T, Heinzer H, Steuber T, Salomon G, Engel O, Michl U et al. (2011). Full Functional-Length Urethral Sphincter Preservation During Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 60(2): 320-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.02.040; PMid:21458913

23. Seetharam Bhat KR, Seetharam Bhat KR, Moschovas MC, Onol FF, Sandri M, Rogers T, Roof S et al. (2020). Trends in clinical and oncological outcomes of robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy before and after the 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation against PSA screening: a decade of experience. BJU Int. 125(6): 884-892. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15051; PMid:32173990

24. Sengupta S, Ischia J, Webb DR. (2011). Single-layer anatomical reconstruction of the vesico-urethral anastomosis during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). BJU Int. 107(2): 340-343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09960.x; PMid:21208370

25. Sood A, Jeong W, Peabody JO, Hemal AK, Menon M. (2014). Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Urol Clin North Am. 41(4): 473-484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2014.07.002; PMid:25306159

26. Stolzenburg J, McNeill A, Liatsikos EN. (2008). Nerve‐sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 101(7): 909-928. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07544.x; PMid:18321324

27. Tan G, Srivastava A, Grover S, Peters D, Dorsey P Jr, Scott A et al. (2010). Optimizing Vesicourethral Anastomosis Healing After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Lessons Learned from Three Techniques in 1900 Patients. J Endourol. 24(12): 1975-1983. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2009.0630; PMid:20973740

28. Velthoven RFV. (2008). Optimization of the Vesicourethral Anastomotic Model in Laparoscopic Prostatectomy Performed on Large Prostates. J Endourol. 22(9): 1999-2000. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2008.9758; PMid:18811520

29. Vis AN, van der Poel HG, Ruiter AEC, Hu JC, Tewari AK, Rocco B et al. (2019). Posterior, Anterior, and Periurethral Surgical Reconstruction of Urinary Continence Mechanisms in Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Description and Video Compilation of Commonly Performed Surgical Techniques. Eur Urol. 76(6): 814-822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.035; PMid:30514568

30. Von Ahlen C, Geissler A, Vogel J. (2024). Comparison of the effectiveness of open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies based on complication rates: a retrospective observational study with administrative data from Switzerland. BMC Urol. 24(1): 215. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-024-01597-3; PMid:39375695 PMCid:PMC11457412

31. Walz J, Epstein JI, Ganzer R, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Kaouk J et al. (2016). A Critical Analysis of the Current Knowledge of Surgical Anatomy of the Prostate Related to Optimisation of Cancer Control and Preservation of Continence and Erection in Candidates for Radical Prostatectomy: An Update. Eur Urol. 70(2): 301-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.01.026; PMid:26850969

32. Weld KJ, Ames CD, Hruby G, Humphrey PA, Landman J. (2006). Evaluation of a novel knotless self-anchoring suture material for urinary tract reconstruction. Urology. 67(6): 1133-1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2005.12.022; PMid:16750256

33. Williams SB, Alemozaffar M, Lei Y, Hevelone N, Lipsitz SR et al. (2010). Randomized Controlled Trial of Barbed Polyglyconate Versus Polyglactin Suture for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy Anastomosis: Technique and Outcomes. Eur Urol. 58(6): 875-881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.07.021; PMid:20708331