- Identification of the main predictor of the success of treatment of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in newborns
Identification of the main predictor of the success of treatment of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in newborns
Modern Pediatrics. Ukraine. (2026).1(153): 169-174. doi: 10.15574/SP.2026.1(153).169174
Konoplitskyi V. S.1, Sasiuk A. I.1, Rubina O. S.1, Bertsun K. T.2, Lukiianets O. O.1
1National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnytsia, Ukraine
2MNPE “Vinnytsia Regional Children's Clinical Hospital of Vinnytsia Regional Council”, Ukraine
For citation: Konoplitskyi VS, Sasiuk AI, Rubina OS, Bertsun KT, Lukiianets OO. (2026). Identification of the main predictor of the success of treatment of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in newborns. Modern Pediatrics. Ukraine. 1(153): 169-174. doi: 10.15574/SP.2026.1(153).169174.
Article received: Aug 19, 2025. Accepted for publication: Feb 08, 2026.
Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) in newborns is one of the most severe congenital anomalies with a high mortality rate. The diaphragmatic defect leads to the herniation of abdominal organs (stomach, intestines, spleen, liver) into the thoracic cavity, causing lung compression and profound dysfunction of the respiratory, cardiovascular, and digestive systems.
Aim – to establish a hierarchy of prognostic factors determining treatment success and survival rates in newborns with CDH.
A retrospective medical record review was conducted on 18 hospitalized newborns with CDH (10 males, 8 females) aged 0 to 21 days. The clinical course, instrumental findings, and the effectiveness of multidisciplinary treatment strategies were evaluated. Of the 18 patients, 12 underwent surgical repair (one postoperative death). Six infants died preoperatively due to severe refractory pulmonary hypertension (PH) and comorbidities. Clinical cases illustrate contrasting courses. A 21-day-old female with late manifestation and absent PH was rapidly stabilized and operated on. Conversely, a 1-day-old male with prenatally diagnosed CDH presented in critical condition due to severe PH and hypoxemia. He required massive pharmacological support and prolonged (72-hour) preoperative stabilization prior to type B CDH repair, followed by extended mechanical ventilation and parenteral nutrition.
Conclusions. PH severity often correlating with diaphragmatic defect size is the leading criterion determining optimal surgical timing and success; gestational age is not a decisive prognostic factor. Since standard PH therapies may fail, preoperative preparation duration must be highly individualized based on therapeutic response. Success fundamentally relies on a coordinated multidisciplinary team.
This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from the children’s parents for the conduct of the study.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Keywords: newborns, diaphragmatic hernia, pulmonary hypertension.
REFERENCES
1. Basurto D, Russo FM, Papastefanou I, Bredaki E, Allegaert K, Pertierra A et al. (2022). Pulmonary hypertension in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: antenatal prediction and impact on neonatal mortality. Prenat Diagn. 42(10): 1303-1311. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6207; PMid:35801282
2. Beurskens LW, Tibboel D, Lindemans J, Duvekot JJ, Cohen-Overbeek TE, Veenma DC et al. (2010). Retinol status of newborn infants is associated with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatrics. 126(4): 712-720. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-0521; PMid:20837596
3. Brownlee EM, Howatson AG, Davis CF, Sabharwal AJ. (2009). The hidden mortality of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a 20-year review. J Pediatr Surg. 44(2): 317-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.10.076; PMid:19231525
4. Chandrasekharan PK, Rawat M, Madappa R, Rothstein DH, Lakshminrusimha S. (2017). Congenital Diaphragmatic hernia – a review. Maternal Health, Neonatology and Perinatology. 3: 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40748-017-0045-1; PMid:28331629 PMCid:PMC5356475
5. Chaudhari T, Schmidt Sotomayor N, Maheshwari R. (2024). Diagnosis, management and long term cardiovascular outcomes of phenotypic profiles in pulmonary hypertension associated with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Front Pediatr. 12: 1356157. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2024.1356157; PMid:38590769 PMCid:PMC10999638
6. Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group; Kevin P Lally, et al. (2007). Defect Size Determines Survival in Infants With Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 42(9): 1526-1531. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-3040; PMid:17766505
7. Emanuel H, Breitschopf HV, Harting MT, Martinez Castillo DJ, Yadav A, McBeth K et al. (2023). Pulmonary outcomes of congenital diaphragmatic hernia patients based on defect size (CDH Study Group Stage). Transl Pediatr. 12(8): 1490-1503. https://doi.org/10.21037/tp-23-14; PMid:37692542 PMCid:PMC10485646
8. Gallot D, Boda C, Ughetto S, Perthus I, Robert-Gnansia E, Francannet C et al. (2007). Prenatal detection and outcome of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a French registry-based study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 29(3): 276-283. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.3863; PMid:17177265
9. Greer JJ. (2013). Current concepts on the pathogenesis and etiology of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 189(2): 232-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2013.04.015; PMid:23665522
10. Mah VK, Zamakhshary M, Mah DY, Cameron B, Bass J, Bohn D et al. (2009). Absolute vs relative improvements in congenital diaphragmatic hernia survival: what happened to "hidden mortality". J Pediatr Surg. 44(5): 877-882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.01.046; PMid:19433161
11. McGivern MR, Best KE, Rankin J, Wellesley D, Greenlees R, Addor MC, Arriola L et al. (2015). Epidemiology of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in Europe: a register-based study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 100(2): F137-144. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2014-306174; PMid:25411443
12. Otaño JC, Murua V, Rugilo J, Reussmann A, Rührnschopf CG et al. (2024). Hernia diafragmática congénita: relación entre el tamaño del defecto y evolución. Experiencia en un centro de referencia. Anales de Pediatría. 101(1): 29-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anpedi.2024.04.014; PMid:38971707
13. Salas GL, Otaño JC, Cannizzaro CM, Mazzucchelli MT, Goldsmit GS. (2020). Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: postnatal predictors of mortality. Arch Argent Pediatr. 118(3): 173-179. https://doi.org/10.5546/aap.2020.eng.173
14. Veenma DC, de Klein A, Tibboel D. (2012). Developmental and genetic aspects of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatr Pulmonol. 47(6): 534-545. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.22553; PMid:22467525
15. Wat MJ, Veenma D, Hogue J, Holder AM, Yu Z, Wat JJ et al. (2011). Genomic alterations that contribute to the development of isolated and non-isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Med Genet. 48(5): 299-307. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.2011.089680; PMid:21525063 PMCid:PMC3227222
