HEALTH OF WOMAN. 2017.2(118):126–131
Yuzko А. M.
SHEI «Bukovinian state medical University», «Medical centre of infertility treatment», the Ukrainian Association of reproductive medicine, Chernovtsy

The paper describes the modern recommendations when choosing a method of diagnosing and treatment of female infertility tubal origin.

Key words: female infertility of tubal origin, diagnosis, surgical treatment, in vitro fertilization.

REFERENCES

1. Ginekologiya: uchebnik. Pod red. VE Radzinskogo, AM Fuksa. M, GEOTAR-Media. 2014: 1000.

2. Klinicheskaya praktika v reproduktivnoy meditsine: rukovodstvo dlya vrachey. Pod red. VN Lokshina, TM Dzhusubalievoy. Almatyi: MedMedia Kazahstan. 2015: 464.

3. Ahmad G, Watson AJ, Metwally M. 2007. Laparoscopy or laparotomy for distal tubal surgery? A meta-analysis. Hum. Fertil (Camb). 10;1: 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647270600977820; PMid:17454208

4. Ahmad G, Watson A, Vandekerckhove P, Lilford R. 2006, Apr 19. Techniques for pelvic surgery in subfertility. Electronic resource. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2):CD000221; www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/pubmed/16625531 (last access: 22.12.16). – Title from the screen.

5. Akande VA, Cahill DJ, Wardle PG, Rutherford AJ and Jenkins JM. 2004, November. The predictive value of the «Hull & Rutherford» classification for tubal damage. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 111;11:1236–1241.

6. Conway S. 2010, January. Tubal Reversal versus IVF: Which is the best choice? Electronic resource. The Conception Connection. The Official Publication of Georgia Reproductive Specialists:6–7.  www. ivf. com/ downloads/CC_1201.pdf (last access: 26.12.16). Title from the screen.

7. Das S, Nardo LG, Seif MW. 2007. Proximal tubal disease: the place for tubal cannulation Electronic resource. Reprod Biomed Online. 15;4:383–388; www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17908398 (last access: 29.11.16). Title from the screen.

8. Dun ЕC, Nezhat CH. 2012. Tubal Factor Infertility Diagnosis and Management in the Era of Assisted Reproductive Technology. Electronic resource. Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. N. Am. 39:551–566; blog. utp. edu.co/maternoinfantil/files/2012/04/Tubal-Factor-Infertility.pdf (last access: 29.11.16). Title from the screen.

9. International Federation of Fertility Societies Global Standards of Infertility Care. Standard 7. Assessment of tubal patency. Recommendations for Practice. Electronic resource. c. ymcdn. com/ sites/ www.iffs-reproduction. org/ resource/resmgr/Policy_Statements/Standard_7tubal_patency_asse.pdf (last access: 05.12.16).  Title from the screen.

10. International Federation of Fertility Societies Global Standards of Infertility Care. Standard 9. Tubal Surgery. Recommendations for Practice. Electronic resource. c. ymcdn. com/ sites/ www.iffs-reproduction. org/ resource/resmgr/Policy_Statements/Standard_9_TubalsurgeryJuly _.pdf (last access: 05.12.16). Title from the screen.

11. Jennifer Hirshfeld-Cytron, Jordan Winter. 2013. Laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis versus in vitro fertilization: cost-based decision analysis. Electronic resource. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 209;1:56-56. (last access: 19.12.16). Title from the screen. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.04.018

12. Johnson N, van Voorst S, Sowter MC, Strandell A, Mol BW. 2010, Jan 20. Surgical treatment for tubal disease in women due to undergo in vitro fertilization. Electronic resource. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (1):CD002125. doi: 10. 1002/ 14651858. CD 002125. pub3; www. ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20091531 (last access: 22.12.16). Title from the screen.

13. Nardo L.G. Proximal tubal disease – tubal surgery or IVF. Electronic resource. // www. google. com.ua/ url? sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwinjPO33M3QAhVlJ5oKHRh1DJkQFggbMAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.eshre.eu%2F~%2Fmedia%2Fsitecore-files% 2FSIGs % 2 FSurgery % 2FGrado-2011 % 2FNardo. pdf % 3Fla% 3Den&usg = AFQ jCNE gyp8-XGv X8G Zvp H0JO wz DZoT DSA&sig2=g5cdMCTgGnaDGrOekTEp2g (last access: 29.11.16). Title from the screen.

14. Nardo LG, Tin-Chiu Li. 2007. Introduction. Electronic resource. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 15;4: 367–368. www.rbmojournal.com/article/S1472-6483(10)60359-8/pdf (last access: 29.11.16). Title from the screen. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60359-8

15. Rutherford AJ, Jenkins JM. 2002. Hull and Rutherford classification of infertility. Human Fertility (Camb). 5(1 Suppl): S41–45.

16. Shi-En Zou, Yi Jin, Yi-Ling Ko, Jin Zhu. 2014. A new classification system for pregnancy prognosis of tubal factor infertility. Electronic resource. Int J Clin Exp Med. 7(5): 1410–1416; www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/ pmc/articles/PMC4073765/ (last access: 19.12.16). Title from the screen.

17. Tsiami A, Chaimani A, Mavridis D, Siskou M, Assimakopoulos E, Sotiriadis A. 2016. Surgical treatment for hydrosalpinx prior to in-vitro fertilization embryo transfer: a network meta-analysis. Electronic resource. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 48;4: 434–445; onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/uog.15900/abstract (last access: 22.12.16). Title from the screen.

18. Zhang Y, Sun Y, Guo Y, Li TC, Duan H. 2015. Salpingectomy and proximal tubal occlusion for hydrosalpinx prior to in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Electronic resource. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 70(1): 33–38; www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25616345 (last access: 22.12.16). Title from the screen.