HEALTH OF WOMAN.2017.1(117):109–115; doi 10.15574/HW.2017.117.109

Veropotvelyan N. P.
The «Inter-provincial center of medical genetics and prenatal diagnosis», Krivoy Rog

The study presents data of different authors, as well as its own data on the frequency of multiple trisomies among the early reproductive losses in the I trimester of pregnancy and live fetuses in pregnant women at high risk of chromosomal abnormalities (CA) in I and II trimesters of gestation.

The objective: determining the frequency of occurrence of double (DT) and multiple trisomies (MT) among the early reproductive losses in the I trimester of pregnancy and live fetuses in pregnant women at high risk of occurrence of HA in I and II trimesters of gestation; establishment of the most common combinations of diesel fuel and the timing of their deaths compared with single regular trisomy; comparative assessment materinskogo age with single, double and multiple trisomies.

Patients and methods. During the period from 1997 to 2016, the first (primary) group of products in 1808 the concept of missed abortion (ST) of I trimester was formed from women who live in Dnepropetrovsk, Zaporozhye, Kirovograd, Cherkasy, Kherson, Mykolaiv regions. The average term of the ST was 8±3 weeks. The average age of women was 29±2 years. The second group (control) consisted of 1572 sample product concepts received during medical abortion in women (mostly residents of Krivoy Rog) in the period of 5-11 weeks of pregnancy, the average age was 32 years. The third group was made prenatally karyotyped fruits (n = 9689) pregnant women with high risk of HA of the above regions of Ukraine, directed the Centre to invasive prenatal diagnosis for individual indications: maternal age, changes in the fetus by ultrasound (characteristic malformations and echo markers HA) and high risk of HA on the results of the combined prenatal screening I and II trimesters. From 11 th to 14 th week of pregnancy, chorionic villus sampling was performed (n=1329), with the 16th week – platsentotsentez (n=2240), 18 th and 24 th week – amniocentesis (n=6120).

Results. A comparative evaluation of maternal age and the prevalence anembriony among multiple trisomies. Analyzed 13,069 karyotyped embryonic and fetal I-II trimester of which have found 40 cases of multiple trisomies – 31 cases in the group in 1808 missed abortion (2.84% of total HA), 3 cases including 1 572 induced medabortov and 7 cases during 9689 prenatal research (0.51% of HA). Determined to share the double trisomies preembrionalny, fetal, early, middle and late periods of fetal development.

Conclusion. There were no significant differences either in terms of destruction of single and multiple trisomies or in maternal age or in fractions anembrionalnyh pregnancies in these groups.

Key words: multiple trisomies, double trisomy, missed abortion, prenatal diagnosis.

REFERENCES

1. Miller JF, Williamson E, Glue J, Gordon YB, Grudzinskas JG and Sykes A. 1980. Fetal loss after implantation. A prospective study. Lancet 2(8194):554–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(80)91991-1

2. Warburton D, Stein Z, Kline J, Susser M et al. 1980. Chromosome abnormalities in spontaneous abortion: data from the New York City study. In Porter IH and Hook EB (eds) Human Embryonic and Fetal Death. Academic Press, New York: 261–287.

3. Santalo J, Badenas J, Catala V and Egozcue J. 1987. Chromosomes of mouse embryos in vivo and in vitro: effect of manipulation, maternal age and gam-ete ageing. Hum Reprod 2:717–719. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136620; PMid:3437052

4. Boue J, Boue A, Lazar P. 1975. Retrospective and prospective epidemiological studies of 1500 karyotyped spontaneous human abortions. Teratology 12:11-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/tera.1420120103; PMid:1162621

5. Hassold T, Chiu D. 1985. Maternal age-specific rates of numericfl chromosome abnormalities with special reference to trisomy. Hum Genet 70:11-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00389450; PMid:3997148

6. Kline J, Stein Z. 1987. Epidemiology of Chromosomal Anomalies in Sponta-neous Abortion: Prevalence, Manifestation and Determinants. In: Bennett MJ, Edmonds DK, editors. Spontaneous and Recurrent Abortion. Chicago: Oxford Blackwell Scientific :29-50.

7. Menasha J, Levy B, Hirschhorn K, Kardon NB. 2005. Incidence and spectrum of chromosome abnormalities in spontaneous abortions: New insights from a 12-year study. Genetics in Medicine 7:251-263. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.GIM.0000160075.96707.04; PMid:15834243

8. Veropotvelyan MP, Kodunov LO, Veropotvelyan PM, Nesterchuk DO, Goruk PS, Kostinets VM. 2012. Viznachennya pervinnoyi populyatsiynoyi chastoti hromosomnoyi patologiyi i rannoyi embrionalnoyi letalnosti v Ukrayini. Zdorove zhenshchiny 9:108–114.

9. Hassold T, Chen N, Funkhouser J, Jooss T, Manuel B, Matsuura J, Matsuyama A, Wilson C, Yamane JA and Jacobs PA. 1980. A cytogenetic study of 1000 spontaneous abortions. Ann Hum Genet 44(Pt 2):151–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1809.1980.tb00955.x; PMid:7316468

10. Nagaishi M, Yamamoto T, Iinuma K, Shimomura K, Berend SA and Knops J. 2004. Chromosome abnormalities identified in 347 spontaneous abortions collected in Japan. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 30(3):237–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0756.2004.00191.x; PMid:15210050

11. Carr DH. 1967. Chromosome anomalies as a cause of spontaneous abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 97:283–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(67)90488-7

12. Creasy MR, Crolla JA and Alberman ED. 1976. A cytogenetic study of humanspontaneous abortions using banding techniques. Hum Genet 31:177–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00296145

13. Lauritsen JG. 1976. Aetiology of spontaneous abortion. A cytogenetic and epidemiological study of 288 abortuses and their parents. Acta Obstet GynecolScand Suppl 52:1–29. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016347609156437

14. Takahara H, Ohama K and Fujiwara A. 1977. Cytogenetic study in early spontaneous abortion. Hiroshima J Med Sci 26:291–296. PMid:615176

15. Kajii T, Ferrier A, Niikawa N, Takahara H, Ohama K and Avirachan S. 1980. Anatomic and chromosomal anomalies in 639 spontaneous abortuses. HumGenet 55:87–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00329132

16. Lin CC, De Braekeleer M and Jamro H. 1985. Cytogenetic studies in spontaneous abortion: the Calgary experience. Can J Genet Cytol 27:565–570. https://doi.org/10.1139/g85-083

17. Eiben B, Bartels I, Bahr-Porsch S, Borgmann S, Gatz G, Gellert G, Goebel R, Hammans W, Hentemann M, Osmers R et al. 1990. Cytogenetic analysis of 750 spontaneous abortions with the direct-preparation method of chorionicvilli and its implications for studying genetic causes of pregnancy wastage. Am J Hum Genet 47:656–663. PMid:2220806 PMCid:PMC1683793

18. Zhou CR. 1990. Cytogenetic studies of spontaneous abortions in humans. Chung Hua Fu Chan Ko Tsa Chih 25:89–91. PMid:2364797

19. Ohno M, Maeda T and Matsunobu A. 1991. A cytogenetic study of spontaneous abortions with direct analysis of chorionic villi. Obstet Gynecol 77:394–398. PMid:1992406

20. Warburton D, Byrne J and Canki N. 1991. Chromosome anomalies and prenatal development: an atlas. Oxf Monogr Med Genet 21:57–100.

21. Dejmek J, Vojtassak J and Malova J. 1992. Cytogenetic analysis of 1508 spontaneous abortions originating from south Slovakia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 46:129–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-2243(92)90257-Y

22. Gardo S and Bajnoczky K. 1992. Cytogenetic analysis of spontaneous abortions with direct analysis of chorionic villi. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 47:117–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-2243(92)90040-6

23. Kalousek DK, Pantzar T, Tsai M and Paradice B. 1993. Early spontaneous abortion: morphologic and karyotypic findings in 3,912 cases. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser 29:53–61. PMid:8280893

24. Reddy KS. 1997. Double trisomy in spontaneous abortions. Hum Genet 101:339–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004390050638; PMid:9439664

25. Sullivan J, Yusef R. 2000. Double and triple trisomy in spontaneous abortions: an older maternal age and earlier gestational age than seen in single trisomies. Genetic in Medicine 2. https://doi.org/10.1097/00125817-200001000-00160

26. Mathew S, Venkat R. 2014. Double and multiple chromosomal aneuploidies in spontaneous abortion: a single institutional experience. JHRS. 7:262-268. PMid:25624662 PMCid:PMC4296400

27. Dan Diego-Alvarez et al. 2006. Double trisomy in spontaneous miscarriages: cytogenetic and molecular approach. Human Reproduction 21;4:958–966, doi: 10.1093/humrep/ dei406Advance Access publication December 16, 2005.

28. Opinion. Мiscarriage in contemporary maternal – fetal medicine: targeting clinical dilemmas. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology. 2013. 5:491–497.

29. Veropotvelyan MP ta spivavt. 2004. Zaprovadzhennnya tsitogenetichnogo doslidzhennya nekropsiyi platsenti, dostavlenoyi z viddalenih regioniv, pri mnozhinnih vadah rozvitku ploda. Zbirnik naukovih prats spivrobitnikiv KMAPO im. P.L. Shupika. K:136–139. 

30. Veropotvelyan MP, Kodunov LO, Nesterchuk DO. 2012. Vikoristannya nekropsiyi trofoblasta dlya viznachennya kariotipu ploda pri spontannih abortah, mertvonarodzhenni ta eliminatsiyi anomalnih plodiv. Zdorove zhenshchiny 10(76):77–79.

31. Baranov VS, Kuznetsova TV. 2007. Tsitogenetika embrionalnogo razvitiya cheloveka. Spb:640.

32. Martin RH, Ko E and Rademaker A. 1991. Distribution of aneuploidy in human gametes: comparison between hu man sperm and oocytes. Am J Med Genet 39:321–331. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.1320390315; PMid:1867285

33. Hassold T, Abruzzo M, Adkins K, Griffin D, Merrill M, Millie E, Saker D, Shen J and Zaragoza M. 1996. Human aneuploidy: incidence, origin, and etiology. Environ Mol Mutagen 28:167–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2280(1996)28:3<167::AID-EM2>3.3.CO;2-V; https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2280(1996)28:3<167::AID-EM2>3.0.CO;2-B

34. Koehler KE, Hawley RS, Sherman S and Hassold T. 1996. Recombination and nondisjunction in humans and flies. Hum Mol Genet 5(Special Number):1495–1504. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/5.Supplement_1.1495; PMid:8875256

35. MacDonald M, Hassold T, Harvey J, Wang LH, Morton NE and Jacobs P. 1994. The origin of 47,XXY and 47,XXX aneuploidy: heterogeneous mechanisms and role of aberrant recombination. Hum Mol Genet 3:1365–1371. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/3.8.1365; PMid:7987316

36. Fisher JM, Harvey JF, Morton NE and Jacobs PA. 1995. Trisomy 18: studies of the parent and cell division of origin and the effect of aberrant recombination on nondisjunction. Am J Hum Genet 56:669–675. PMid:7887421 PMCid:PMC1801162

37. James RS and Jacobs PA. 1996. Molecular studies of the aetiology of trisomy 8 in spontaneous abortions and the liveborn population. Hum Genet 97:283–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02185754; PMid:8786064

38. DeBrasi D, Genardi M, D’Agostino A, Calvieri F, Tozzi C, Varrone S and Neri G. 1995. Double autosomal/gonosomal mosaic aneuploidy: study of nondisjunction in two cases with trisomy of chromosome 8. Hum Genet 95:519–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223863; PMid:7759072

39. Robinson WP, Binkert F, Bernasconi F, Lorda-Sanchez I, Werder EA and Schinzel AA. 1995. Molecular studies of chromosomal mosaicism: relativefrequency of chromosome gain or loss and possible role of cell selection. Am J Hum Genet 56:444–451. PMid:7847381 PMCid:PMC1801123

40. Robinson WP, Bernasconi F, Lau A and McFadden DE. 1999. Frequency of meiotic trisomy depends on involved chromosome and mode of ascertainment. Am J Med Genet 84:34–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19990507)84:1<34::AID-AJMG8>3.0.CO;2-7; https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19990507)84:1<34::AID-AJMG8>3.3.CO;2-Z

41. Hassold T, Merrill M, Adkins K, Freeman S and Sherman S. 1995. Recombi-nation and maternal age-dependent nondisjunction: molecular studies of trisomy 16. Am J Hum Genet 57:867–874. PMid:7573048 PMCid:PMC1801507

42. Eggermann T, Nothen MM, Eiben B, Hofmann D, Hinkel K, Fimmers R and Schwanitz G. 1996. Trisomy of human chromosome 18: molecular studies on parental origin and cell stage of nondisjunction. Hum Genet 97:218–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02265269; PMid:8566957

43. Bugge M, Collins A, Petersen MB, Fisher J, Brandt C, Hertz JM, Tranebjaerg L, de Lozier-Blanchet C, Nicolaides P.

44. Brondum-Nielsen K, Morton N and Mikkelsen M. 1998. Non-disjunction of chromosome 18. Hum Mol Genet 7:661–669. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/7.4.661; PMid:9499419

45. Li QY, Tsukishiro S, Nakagawa C, Tanemura M, Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Suzumori K and Sonta S. 2005. Parental origin and cell stage of non-disjunction of double  trisomy  in  spontaneous abortion. Congenit Anom (Kyoto) 45:21–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4520.2005.00056.x; PMid:15737127

46. Warburton D, Kline J, Stein Z, Hutzler M, Chin A and Hassold T. 1987. Does the karyotype of a spontaneous abortion predict the karyotype of a subsequent abortion? Evidence from 273 women with two karyotyped spontaneous abortions. Am J Hum Genet 41:465–483. PMid:3631080 PMCid:PMC1684190

47. Hassold T, Merrill M, Adkins K et al. 1995. Recombination and maternal age-dependent nondisjunction: molecular studies of trisomy 16. Am J Hum Genet 57:867–74. PMid:7573048 PMCid:PMC1801507

48. Fisher JM, Harvey JF et al. 1995. Trisomy 18:studies of the parent and cell division of origin and the effect of aberrant recombination on nondisjunction. Am J Hum Genet 56:669–75. PMid:7887421 PMCid:PMC1801162

49. Bugge M, Collins A et al. 1998. Nondisjunction of chromosome 18. Hum Mol Genet 7:661–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/7.4.661; PMid:9499419

50. Hassold TJ. 1998. Nondisjunction in the human male. Curr Top Dev Biol 37:383–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0070-2153(08)60181-7

51. Henderson SA, Edwards RG. 1968. Chiasma frequency and maternal age in mammals. Nature 217:22–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/218022a0

52. Hassold T, Abruzzo M еt al. 1996. Human aneuploidy: incidence , origin, and etiology. Envirov Mol Matagen 28:167–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2280(1996)28:3<167::AID-EM2>3.3.CO;2-V; https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2280(1996)28:3<167::AID-EM2>3.0.CO;2-B

53. Savage AR, Petersen MB et al. 1998. Elucidating the mechanisms of paternal nondisjunction of chromosome 21 in human. Hum Mol Genet 7:1221–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/7.8.1221

54. Recurrent pregnancy loss causes, controversies and treatment/ edited by Howard JA Car. CRC Press. 2007.