Modern Pediatrics. Ukraine. 7(111): 28-33. doi 10.15574/SP.2020.111.28
Pokhilko V. I., Kozakevich E. B., Kozakevich V. K., Zyuzina L. S., Melashchenko E. I.
Ukrainian Medical Stomatological Academy, Poltava, Ukraine

For citation: Pokhilko VI, Kozakevich EB, Kozakevich VK, Zyuzina LS, Melashchenko EI. (2020). Determination of risk predictors of statokinetic development delay and polymorphism of GSTP1, GSTT1, GSTM1, ACE, AGT2R1 AND ENOS genes in premature children with very low and extremely low birth weight. Modern Pediatrics. Ukraine. 7(111): 28_33. doi 10.15574/SP.2020.111.28
Article received: Aug 09, 2020. Accepted for publication: Nov 07, 2020.

World statistics and scientific research show that premature birth of children is accompanied by a high risk of not only somatic, but also neurological pathology and mental disorders development. Therefore, the clinical prognostic model development for the research of delayed infant statokinetic development, which was born prematurely, may be the basis for creating a preventive program of early intervention.
Purpose — to determine the clinical and genetic delayed statokinetic development formation determinants of children born with a body weight less than 1500 g; to develop an algorithm for early prediction of adverse effects.
Materials and methods. A cohort prospective study was conducted, which included 155 children with very low and extremely low body weight. Their statokinetic development at 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months of adjusted age was studied and the determinants were established. Genetic methods included studies of the GSTP1, GSTT1, GSTM1, ACE, AGT2R1, and eNOS genes polymorphism.
Results. It was defined that at 24 months of adjusted age 19% have delayed statokinetic development, at 36 months — 16% of examined children have very low and extremely low body weight. Important predictors that contribute a delayed statokinetic development were severe intraventricular hemorrhages, anemia in the second year of life, significant delay in physical development at 6 months and socio-economic status of the family. The greatest delay in the motor sphere was found in children with a dominant genetic model (GG+AG vs. AA) of the GSTP1 gene.
Conclusions. The developed model for predicting motor developmental delay at an early age has a high specificity (92.44%) and moderate sensitivity (53.33%), which indicates the possibility of its use for forecasting and personalized method of treatment.
The research was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of these Institutes. The informed
consent of the patient was obtained for conducting the studies.
No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Key words: prediction, statokinetic development, very low body weight, extremely low body weight, premature babies, premature infants.

REFERENCES

1. Arand MA, Muhlbauer R, Hengstler J. (1996). Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Protocol for the Simultaneous Analysis of the Glutathione S-Transferase GSTM1 and GSTT1 Polymorphisms. Analytical Biochemistry. 236: 184-186. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1996.0153; PMid:8619490

2. Horovenko NH, Znamenska TK, Kovalova OM. (2010). Henetychnyi monitorynh novonarodzhenykh u viddilenniakh intensyvnoi terapii (na prykladi heniv simeistva hlutation-s-transferaz). Poltava: 35.

3. Iwata S, Nakamura T, Hizume E. (2012). Qualitative Brain MRI at Term and Cognitive Outcomes at 9 Years After Very Preterm Birth. Pediatrics. 129 (5): 1138-1147. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-1735; PMid:22529280

4. Korzhynskyi YS, Slivinska-Kurchak KB. (2013). Osoblyvosti fizychnoho, psykhomotornoho rozvytku ta zakhvoriuvanosti u ditei rannoho viku, yaki potrebuvaly provedennia shtuchnoi ventyliatsii lehen u neonatalnomu periodi. Medytsyna transportu Ukrainy. 4 (48): 69-76.

5. Kozakevich OB. (2016). Physical development extremely premature infants during the first three years of life and risk factors affecting its considerable delay. Sovremennaya pediatriya. 4 (76): 36-39. https://doi.org/10.15574/SP.2016.76.36

6. Kozakevych VK, Kozakevych OB, Demidenkova HH, Martynenko NV, Kashchenko AIu. (2019). Psykho-emotsiinyi rozvytok peredchasno naro-dzhenykh ditei ta determinanty, shcho yoho vyznachaiut. Aktual'ni problemy suchasnoyi medytsyny: Visnyk Ukrayins'koyi medychnoyi stomatolohichnoyi akademiyi. 2 (1): 139-144.

7. Kozakevych VK, Kozakevych OB, Ziuzina LS. (2019). Risk assessment of delayed speech development of children born with very low and extremely low body weight. Sovremennaya pediatriya. 1 (97): 34-38. https://doi.org/10.15574/SP.2019.97.34

8. Linda D, Breeman JJ, Baumann N, Bartmann P. (2015). Preterm Cognitive Function Into Adulthood. Pediatrics. 136 (3): 415-422. URL: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2015/08/05/peds. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-0608; PMid:26260714

9. Moore T, Hennessy M, Myles J. (2012). Neurological and developmental outcome in extremely preterm children born in England in 1995 and 2006: the EPICure studies. BMJ. 345: 7961. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e7961; PMid:23212880 PMCid:PMC3514471

10. MOZ Ukrainy. (2008). Klinichnyi protokol medychnoho dohliadu za zdorovoiu dytynoiu vikom do 3 rokiv. Nakaz хн6е MOZ Ukrainy No. 149 vid23.03.2008. Ofitsiinyi visnyk Ukrainy: 67.

11. Pokhylko VI, Kozakevych OB, Kaliuzhka OO. (2015). Vplyv polimorfizmu heniv simeistv hlutation-S-transferaz na rozvytok ta zakhvoriuvanist peredchasno narodzhenykh ditei z bronkholehenevoiu dysplaziieiu. Aktualni pytannia pediatrii, akusherstva ta hinekolohii. 1 (15): 75–80.

12. Pokhylko VI, Ziuzina LS, Kozakevych OB, Martynenko NV. (2020). The contribution of genetic determinants to the development of significant delay in physical development of extremely low-birth-weight infants. Mizhnarodna naukovo-praktychna konferentsii «Perspectives Of World Science And Education». Osaka: 170–173.

13. Riha OO. (2016). Rezultaty katamnestychnoho sposterezhennia za ditmy hrupy ryzyku. Likarska sprava. 1 (2): 96–101.

14. Rossokha ZI. (2007). Rol henetychnykh ta seredovyshchnykh faktoriv u rozvytku patolohichnykh staniv na rannikh etapakh ontohenezu. Kyiv: 149.

15. Salminen LE, Schofield PR, Pierce KD. (2014). Impact of the AGTR1 A1166C polymorphism on subcortical hyperintensities and cognition in healthy older adults. Age (Dordr). 36 (4): 9664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-014-9664-x; PMid:24981111 PMCid:PMC4150909

16. Shunko YY, Laksha OT, Bielova OO. (2016). Analiz perynatalnoi patolohii ditei, yaki narodylys z duzhe maloiu masoiu tila, i stanu zdorovia yikh materiv. Zdorove zhenschinyi. 1 (107): 176-179.

17. Silje K, Elgen F, Hysing M, Markestad T, Sommerfelt K. (2016). Mental Health in Children Born Extremely Preterm Without Severe Neurodevelopmental Disabilities. Pediatrics. 137: 4. URL: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/137/4/peds.2015-3002. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-3002 PMid:26944946

18. Yablon OS, Bondarenko TV, Savrun TI, Bykovska OA, Moravska RO. (2018). Dosvid roboty tsentru katamnestychnoho sposterezhennia u Binnytskyi oblasti. Heonatolohiia, khirurhiia ta perynatalna medytsyna. 4 (30): 5–9.

19. Znamenska TK, Horovenko VI, Pokhylko BI. (2009). Analiz polimorfizmu heniv GSTT1, GSTM1 u novonarodzhenykh, yaki perenesly perynatalnu asfiksiiu. Pediatriia, akusherstvo ta hinekolohiia. 71 (5): 28–29.

20. Znamenska TK, Shunko YY, Kovalova OM, Pokhylko VI, Mavropulo TK. (2016). Priorytety natsionalnoho planu dii z prypynennia smertei novonarodzhenykh, yaki mozhna poperedyty, v ramkakh hlobalnoi stratehii OON «Kozhna zhinka, kozhna dytyna». Neonatolohiia, khirurhiia ta perynatalna medytsyna. 1 (19): 5–11.