HEALTH OF WOMAN. 2019.10(146): 69–71; doi 10.15574/HW.2019.146.69
Boyko A. V.
Sumy State University Medical University, MES of Ukraine,
Shupyk National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education MH of Ukraine, Kyiv

The objective: to study features of course of pregnancy and labors at the women operated concerning neoplasms of ovaries.
Materials and methods. 90 pregnant women with neoplasms of ovaries were surveyed. All pregnant women were divided into 3 studied groups: 1 group – 30 women with neoplasms of ovaries by which surgical treatment is executed in various durations of gestation; The 2nd group – the 30 women with neoplasms of ovaries by which surgical treatment is executed during Cesarean section; The 3rd group – 30 women with neoplasms of ovaries by which surgical treatment is executed in various terms after spontaneous labors. Also 30 women with normally proceeding pregnancy without neoplasms of the ovaries, made control group were surveyed.
Results. The risk of development of premature births was higher when performing a surgical intervention in ІІІ in comparison with ІІ gestation trimester (the relation of chances 10.7; 96% confidential interval 1.36–83.49); when performing operation by any access after 24 weeks of a gestation (the relation of chances 4.18; 94% confidential interval 0.95–18.49); when performing operation by laparotomny in comparison with laparoscopic access (the relation of chances 7.7; 96% confidential interval 1.99–30.81), and also in the presence of symptoms of accompanying placental dysfunction (the relation of chances 17.6; 96% confidential interval 3.31–92.11).
Conclusion. The received results needs to be considered when developing tactics of conducting pregnancy and labors at women with neoplasms of ovaries.
Key words: neoplasms of ovaries, pregnancy, labors.

REFERENCES

1. Babkina TM, Volik NK. 2017. Ekhohrafichni ta dopplerometrychni doslidzhennia v akusherstvi ta hinekolohii. Zdorove zhenshchyny 3: 56–62.

2. Zvarych LI, Lutsenko NS, Shapoval OS. 2015. Chastota funktsionalnykh kist yaiechnykiv u zhinok reproduktyvnoho viku v strukturi hinekolohichnoi patolohii. Suchasni medychni tekhnolohii 2;3 : 79–83.

3. Kuznetsova EP. 2010. Sovremennyie predstavleniya ob etiologii i patogeneze opuholevidnyih obrazovaniy i dobrokachestvennyih opuholey yaichnikov. Saratovskiy nauchno-meditsinskiy zhurnal 6;3: 552–558.

4. Reznichenko GI, Shapoval OS. 2015. Osobennosti realizatsii reproduktivnoy funktsii u zhenschin s dobrokachestvennyimi opuholevidnyimi obrazovaniyami yaichnikov. Zdorove zhenschinyi 2 (98): 104–107.

5. Serebrennikova KG, Kuznetsova EP, Halilov RZ. 2010. Faktoryi riska razvitiya opuholevidnyih obrazovaniy i dobrokachestvennyih opuholey yaichnikov. Uralskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal 6(71): 111–115.

6. Shapoval OS. 2016. Kisty yaiechnykiv. Analiz struktury patolohii u zhinok reproduktyvnoho viku. Scientific journal «ScienceRise: Medical Science» 9(5): 75–79.

7. Shapoval O. 2016. Clinical and Diagnostic Parallels, Therapeutical Strategies in Benign Ovarian Tumor-Like Formations. The Science Advanced 02: 27–33. https://doi.org/10.15550/ASJ.2016.02.027

8. Vorontsova LL, Shapoval OS. 2015. Pathogenetic rationale for the use of immunomodulating and systemic enzyme therapy in treatment of nulliparous women with endometriod ovary tumors. Journal of Education. Health and Sport 1;5: 75–86.