• Clinical aspects of medical-genetic counseling and genetic testing of twins, including those from families with family cancer syndrome
en To content

Clinical aspects of medical-genetic counseling and genetic testing of twins, including those from families with family cancer syndrome

HEALTH OF WOMAN. 2016.9(115):142–147; doi 10.15574/HW.2016.115.142 
 

Clinical aspects of medical-genetic counseling and genetic testing of twins, including those from families with family cancer syndrome


Paliychuk O. V., Polishchuk L. Z., Rossokha Z. I.

Institute of experimental pathology, Oncology and radiobiology R. Е. Kavetsky NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv

PI «Cherkasy regional Oncology center» CRC

SI «Reference-centre on molecular diagnostic MH of Ukraine», Kyiv


The cases of benign and malignant tumors development in family trees of cancer patients and in sister twins are described. The results of complex examination and medical genetic counseling of examined persons are discussed. Polymorph variants T-397C, A-351G of the gene ERS1 (СC- and GG-genotypes), genotype AG of the gene Cyp2D6 were determined that suggest the requirement for medical-genetic counseling and molecular-genetic testing for determination of gene ERS1 polymorphism in females from families with family cancer history, in particular, in twins.


Key words: family tree, proband, twins, hereditary predisposition, gene ERS1 polymorphisms.


REFERENCES

1. Friedenson B. 2005. ВRCA1 and BRCA2 pathways and the risk of cancers other than breast or ovarian.MedGenMed. 7;2:60.

2. Sekine M, Yoshihara K, Tanaka K. 2012. Clinical aspects of familial ovarian cancer – current status and issues in Japan. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 39;4:506–11. PMid:22504673

3. McGuire A, Brown JA, Malone C et al. 2015. Effects of age on the detection and management of breast cancer. Cancers (Basel). 7;2:908–29. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers7020815; PMid:26010605 PMCid:PMC4491690

4. Friebel TM, Domchek SM, Rebbeck TR. 2014. Modifiers o fcancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: systematic review and meta-analysis. J.Natl.Cancer Inst. 106;6: dju091. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dju091.

5. Maradiegue A, Jasperson K, Edwards QT et al. 2008, Feb. Scoping the family history: assessment of Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) in primary care settings—a primer for nurse practitioners. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 20(2):76–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2007.00282.x; PMid:18271762

6. Vasen HF, Mцslein G, Alonso A et al. 2010, Jun. Recommendations to improve identification of hereditary and familial colorectal cancer in Europe.Fam Cancer. 9(2):109–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-009-9291-3; PMid:19763885

7. Sekine M, Yoshihara K, Tanaka K. 2012. Clinical aspects of familial ovarian cancer – current status and issues in Japan. GanTo Kagaku Ryoho. 39;4:506–11. PMid:22504673

8. Kato T, Alonso S, Muto Y et al. 2016. Clinical characteristics of synchronous colorectal cancer sin Japan. World J Surg Oncol. 14(1):272. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-1027-x; PMid:27776528 PMCid:PMC5078884

9. Strahm B, Malkin D. 2006. Hereditary cancer predisposition in children: genetic basis and clinical implications. Int J Cancer. 119(9):2001–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.21962; PMid:16642469