HEALTH OF WOMAN. 2016.3(109):80–82 
 

Clinical aspects of current of pregnancy and labours at multipara pregnancy after auxiliary reproductive technologies

Melnik O. V.

National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education P. L. Shupyk, Kiev

The objective: studying of clinical aspects of current of pregnancy and labours at multipara pregnancy after auxiliary reproductive technologies.

Patients and methods. The analysis of results of pregnancy at 50 women with multipara pregnancy which has come after auxiliary reproductive technologies is carried out. Middle age of women made 31.2±0.6 years. Primary barreness was at 46.0% and secondary – at 54.0 %. Duration of treatment of primary barreness has made 5.9±0.7 years and secondary – 8.1±0.7 years. From the first attempt pregnancy has come at 90.0 % of women, from 2–4 attempts – at 8.0 %, from the sixth attempt – at 2.0 % of women.

Results. Results of the spent researches testify that pregnant women with induced multipara enters into group of high risk on development obstetrical complications: interruption threats, preeclampsia, irondefecy anaemia and placentary dysfunction.

Conclusion. In this connection there is a necessity for careful supervision and inspection of patients for the purpose of decrease in frequency of these complications, developments of tactics of conducting pregnancy and labours, preservations of health of the woman and reception of healthy posterity.

Key words: multipara pregnancy, auxiliary reproductive technologies, pregnancy, childbirth.

REFERENCES

1. Bryan ЕМ. 2010. Support for families with multiple births. Course manual, Diploma in Fetal Medicine 2:39-48.

2. Keith L. 2011. Multiple pregnancy: epidemiology, gestation and perinatal outcome. Parthenon: 1:721-730.

3. MacGillivray I. 2009. Epidemiology of twin pregnancy. Semin. Perinatol. 10:4-8.

4. Fux MA. 2008. Multipara pregnancy. Kiev, Health: 243.

5. Hack KE. 2013. The natural course of monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies: a historical cohort. Twin Res. Hum. Genet. 9:450-455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1375/twin.9.3.450

6. Gul A. 2012. Perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies discordant for major fetal anomalies. Fetal Diagn. Ther. 20:244-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000085078; PMid:15980633

7. Asztalos E. 2011. Evaluating 2 year outcome in twins < or = 30 weeks gestation at birth: a regional perinatal unit's experience. Twin Res. 4:431-438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1375/1369052012759; http://dx.doi.org/10.1375/twin.4.6.431

8. Adegbite AL. 2013. Prevalence of cranial scan abnormalities in preterm twins in relation to chorionicity and discordant birth weight. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 1:47-55.

9. Fitzsimmons BP. 2008. Perinatal and neonatal outcomes in multiple gestations: assisted reproduction versus spontaneous conception. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 9:1162-1167.

10. Hack KE. 2012. The natural course of monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies: a historical cohort. Twin Res. Hum. Genet. 9:450-455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1375/twin.9.3.450

11. Ferreira I. 2005. Chorionicity and adverse perinatal outcome. Acta Med. Port. 3:183-188.

12. Cordero L. 2013. Mean arterial pressure in very low birth weight (801 to 1500 g) concordant and discordant twins during the first day of life. J. Perinatal. 7:545-551.