HEALTH OF WOMAN.2015.10(106):101–103; doi 10.15574/HW.2015.106.103 

Choice of anesthesia for caesarean section in obstetric patients of Vinnytsia region 

Bevz G. V., Tytarenko N. V.

Вінницький національний медичний університет ім. М.І. Пирогова 

Аnaesthetic practice for Caesarean section has changed during the last decades. In the article there has been presented actual data on anaesthetic procedures in obstetric patients in the maternity hospitals and obstetric units in Vinnitsa and Vinnitsa region. Compared to data obtained in 2004, a significant increase in neuraxial anaesthesia for Caesarean section has developed (р<0.05), with spinal anaesthesia being the preferred technique. Neuraxial anaesthesia is the most common technique (54.6%) for scheduled Caesarean section in the Vinnytsia region, in case of urgent Caesarean, delivery figures decrease to 46.4%. 

Key words: Caesarean sections, general anesthesia, neuraxial anesthesia. 

REFERENCES

1. Назарова ІБ, Самойленко ВБ, Муштенко НП, Шембєлєв ІГ. 2012. Патологічне і оперативне акушерство: підручник. За ред. ПМ Баскакова. К, Медицина:519.

2. Починок ТВ, Климчук ВВ. 2014. Кесарський розтин як фактор ризику розвитку соматичної патології у дітей. Неонатологія, хірургія та перинатальна медицина ІV;2(12):117–123.

3. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia. Practice guidelines for obstetric anesthesia: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia. Anesthesiology 106;4:843–863. 2007.

4. Marcus HE, Behrend A, Schier R et al. 2011. Anesthesiological management of Caesarean sections: nationwide survey in Germany. Anaesthesist. 60;10:916–928. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00101-011-1931-y; PMid:21833754

5. Stamer UM, Wiese R, Stuber F et al. 2005. Change in anaesthetic practice for Caesarean section in Germany. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 49;2:170–176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2004.00583.x; PMid:15715617

6. Gogarten W. 2003. Spinal anaesthesia for obstetrics. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 17;3:377–392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1521-6896(02)00116-7