HEALTH OF WOMAN. 2020.2(148): 65–69; doi 10.15574/HW.2020.148.65
Kosakivska I. A.
Shupyk National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Kiev

With the spread of adenoid vegetation into the nasal cavity, their removal and restoration of the respiratory and auditory function in full is significantly difficult.
The objective: of the study was to increase the effectiveness of adenotomy in children.
Materials and methods. Under our supervision in the clinic were 239 children with adenoid vegetation II-III degree, aged 2 to 15 years. In the main group, there were 175 children, in the comparison group – 64. In 10 (4.2%) patients, lymphoid tissue from the nasopharynx spread through the choana into the nasal cavity. All children were operated on under endotracheal anesthesia with endoscopic control. Atypical adenotomy was performed in 83 (47.4%) patients of the main group and in 30 (46.9%) patients of the comparison group.
Results. 239 children with adenoid vegetation were operated on. In all children of the main group, physiological respiration was restored, hearing was restored or improved, and disease recurrence was not observed. In the comparison group, relapse of adenoid vegetation was detected in 4 (6.25%) cases. In 29.3% of cases, an increased density of adenoid vegetation was revealed. In 13.8% of patients, hypertrophy of the tubular and lateral ridges is observed. Blood loss when using high-frequency current decreased 4.7 times.
Conclusions. 1. In 29.3% of pediatric patients, an increased density of adenoid vegetation is detected, and in 4.2%, adenoid vegetation spreads to the nasal cavity, which makes it difficult or sometimes impossible to remove Beckman’s adenotome and requires an «atypical» adenotomy.
2. Atypical location of adenoid vegetation, their increased density and the use of traditional tools for adenotomy can cause a relapse of the disease.
Key words: adenoid vegetation, «atypical» adenotomy, children.

REFERENCES

1. Boyko NV, Bachurina AS. 2015. Adenotomiya i adenotonzillotomiya u detey s zatrudneniem nosovogo dyihaniya. Ros. rinologiya 23(1):9-12.

2. Zlobina NV, Asmanov AI, Radtsig EYu. 2016. Sovremennyie metodyi hirurgicheskogo lecheniya struktur nosoglotki: preimuschestva i perspektivyi. Lechebnoe delo 2:58–63.

3. Bezshapochnyiy SB, Gasyuk YuA, Smeyanov EV. 2017. Giperplaziya i vospalenie glotochnoy mindalinyi. K, Logos:123.

4. Pediatric tonsillectomy: Clinical practice guidelines Lescanne E, Chiron B, Constant I, Couloigner V, Fauroux B, Hassani Y, Jouffroy L, Lesage V, Mondain M, Nowak C, Orliaguet G, Viot A. 2012. European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck diseases 129: 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2012.03.003; PMid:23078979

5. Zabolotko VM ta spivavt. 2017. Otolarynholohichna dopomoha ditiam 0–17 rokiv vkliuchno, shcho perebuvaiut pid nahliadom u zakladakh okhorony zdorovia sfery upravlinnia MOZ Ukrainy, za 2016 rik: 156.

6. Parker DL, Walner NP. 2011. Trends in the indications for pediatric tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 75:282–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.11.019; PMid:21168225

7. Pukhlyk SM. 2016. Adenotomyia – ystorycheskyi эkskurs. Zdorovia Ukrainy 1:37–39.

8. Monroy A, Behar P, Brodsky L. 2008. Revision adenoidectomy – a retrospective. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 72:565-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.01.008; PMid:18295352

9. Shkorbotun YaV, Liakh KV, Shkorbotun VO. Efektyvnist modyfikovanoi mikrodebrydernoi adenotomii. Aktualni pytannia dytiachoi otorynolarynholohii. Materialy II Konhresu dytiachykh otorynolarynholohiv Ukrainy z mizhnarodnoiu uchastiu ADOU (do 100-richchia zasnuvannia Natsionalnoi medychnoi akademii pisliadyplomnoi osvity imeni P.L. Shupyka). Kyiv, 12–13 zhovtnia 2018: 63–64.

10. Kosakivska IA. 2018. Trudnoshchi diahnostyky adenoidnykh vehetatsii u ditei. Sovremennaia pedyatrіia 5(93):11–13. https://doi.org/10.15574/SP.2018.93.11

11. Kosakivska IA. 2018. Dosvid vykonannia adenotomii u ditei. Sovremennaia pedyatryia 96;8:37-41. https://doi.org/10.15574/SP.2018.96.37

12. Laiko AA, Kosakovskyi AL, Zabolotna DD ta in. 2013. Dytiacha otorynolarynholohiia: Natsionalnyi pidruchnyk. Za red. Laika AA. K, Lohos:576.

13. Kosakivska IA. 2016. Hipertrofiia hlotkovoho myhdalyka, shcho imituie khoanalnyi polip. Sovremennaia pedyatrіia 5(77):137–138. https://doi.org/10.15574/SP.2016.77.137

14. Kosakovskyi AL, Kosakivska IA, Semenov RH ta spivavt. 2011. Patent Ukrainy na vynakhid No. 96641. MPK A61V17/24 (2006.01), A61V17/32 (2006.01), A61V17/3211 (2006.01). Adenotom Kosakovskoho – Semenova. Zaiavleno 13.01.2010. Opubl. 25.11.2011. Biul. 22.

15. Kosakivska IA. 2012. Patent Ukrainy na vynakhid No. 99043. MPK (2012.01) A61V17/00. Bipoliarnyi elektroprystrii dlia koahuliatsii tkanyn. Zaiavleno 01.03.2011. Opubl. 10.07.2012. Biul. 13.

16. Kosakovskyi AL, Kosakivska IA, Semenov RH ta spivavt. 2010. Patent Ukrainy na korysnu model No. 51914. MPK (2009) A61V17/00. Elektroprystrii dlia koahuliatsii tkanyn. Zaiavleno 13.01.2010. Opubl. 10.08.2010. Biul. 15.

17. Kosakivska IA. 2017. Patent Ukrainy na korysnu model No. 114693. MPK (2006.01) A61V18/04, A61V18/14. Prystrii dlia koahuliatsii. Zaiavleno 26.10.2016; Opubl. 10.03.2017 r. Biul. 5.