- Assess the intensity of pain in women after caesarean section
Assess the intensity of pain in women after caesarean section
HEALTH OF WOMAN. 2016.3(109):76–79; doi 10.15574/HW.2016.109.76
Assess the intensity of pain in women after caesarean section
Kulchytskyi D. V.
National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education P. L. Shupyk, Kiev
The objective: the assessment of the severity of post-operative pain in women who had elective delivery through cesarean operation.
Patients and methods. Patients were divided into two groups, depending on the method of operation. The main group consisted of 37 women who have a cesarean section performed by the standard method using argon plasma coagulation. Control group consisted of 33 pregnant women who performed the caesarean section as a standard procedure. To assess the severity of postoperative pain using visual analog scale at rest and during coughing after 6 , 12, 24, 48 hours after surgery.
Results. On postoperative stages, corresponding to 12, 24 and 48 hours after cesarean section, pain intensity at rest in I group was lower than in the II group. In addition, the data on stages 12, 24 and 48 g in the intervention group were significantly lower than in the control group (p<0.01). Time period for which there was a reduction in the intensity of pain when coughing to values less than 30 mm, was 12 hours in the main group. In the control group, the severity of pain when coughing during the observation period was maintained at above 30 mm on the visual analogue scale, which required the use of additional pain medication in this group of four women in childbirth (ketorolac 30 mg intramuscularly).
Conclusion. Application argono-plasma coagulation of tissue during a cesarean section, significantly reduces intensity of pain in the postoperative period.
Key words: cesarean section, postoperative pain, argon-plasma coagulation, visual analog scale.
REFERENCES
1. Abramchenko BB, Bolotskih VM. 2007. Exercise therapy in obstetrics and gynecology. SPb:192.
2. Abramchenko BB, Lantsev EA. 1991. Caesarean section. M, Medicine:150.
3. Barash PD, Cullen BF. 2010. Clinical Anesthesiology. M, Med. literature:571.
4. Voltchkov VA, Ignatov UD, Strachko VI. 2006. Pain syndromes in anesthesiology and intensive care. M, MEDpress:320.
5. Ilyukevich GW, Tkachev AV, Prushak AB. 2009. Post-operative pain: pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment. ARSMEDICA 3:51–69.
6. Makarenko TA, Kharitonov LH, Bogdanov AV. 1989. The management of general surgery profile in the postoperative period. M, Medicine:156.
7. Ovechkin AM. 2003. Postoperative analgesia in abdominal surgery, a new look at an old problem. Anesthesiology and Intensive Care 5:45–50.
8. Radzinsky VE, Esipova LN, Vuchenovich UD. 2010. Argon plasma coagulation of tissue during caesarean section. Obstetrics and gynecology 6:28–29.
9. Strizhakov AN, Baev OR. 2007. Surgical Technique cesarean section. M, Miklos:168.
10. Edward MJ. 2001. Clinical Anesthesiology. Book.1. SPb:358–374 .
11. Curr DB. 1988. Operation, anesthesia, and endorphin system. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 26:199.
12. d’Amours R, Riegler F, Little A. 1998. Pathogenesis and management of persistent postthoracotomy pain. Chest.Surg.Clin.N.Am. 8:703–722.
13. Hain RD. 1997. Pain scales in children: a review. Palliat Med. 11(5):341–345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/026921639701100503; PMid:9472590
14. Gillian A. 2011. Measures of Adult Pain. Arthritis Care & Research 63:240–252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr.20543; PMid:22588748
15. Jenkinson C. 1995. Comparisonof the sensitivity to change oflongand short form pain measures. Qual Life Res. 4(4):353—357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01593888; PMid:7550184
16. Usdin E, Kvetnansky R, Axelrod J. 1984. The Role of Catecholamines and Other Neurotransmitters. New York. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers:649–665.
17. Zaioga GP. 1988. Catecholamines in anesthetic and surgical stress. Intern. Anesthesiol. Clin. 26:187.
18. Dolin SJ, Cashman JN, Bland JM. 2002. Effectiveness of acute postoperative pain management I. Evidence from published data. Br J Anaesth. 89(3):409–423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/89.3.409; PMid:12402719