• Adhesive process in gynecology 
en To content

Adhesive process in gynecology 

HEALTH OF WOMAN.2015.3(99):42–46; doi 10.15574/HW.2015.99.42 
 

Adhesive process in gynecology 
 

Medvediev M. V.

SE "Dnipropetrovsk medical Academy of MH of Ukraine" 
 

Despite of wide spread of minimally invasive techniques, adhesions in gynecology are significant cause of postoperative morbidity. It is believed that adhesions may develop in up to 90% of gynecological surgeries. Among the methods of prevention of adhesions in the first place is meticulous surgical technique, reducing tissue trauma, desiccation. In recent years, lots of anti-adhesive agents have been actively implemented, which are divided into two major groups – floating and barrier agents. The second group is the most widely spread one. Obtained impressive results of the effectiveness of these tools, in particular the combination of hyaluronic acid hydroxyethyl starch. 
 

Key words: adhesive process, prevention, operative gynecology, anti adhesive agents. 
 

REFERENCES

1. Robertson D, Lefebvre G. 2010. Adhesion Prevention in Gynaecological Surgery. SOGC CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE. JOGC 32;6:598–602. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.07.002

2. Pathogenesis, consequences, and control of peritoneal adhesions in gynecologic surgery. Fertil Steril. 2008. 90; 5 Suppl: S144–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.060; PMid:19007613

3. Boland GM and Weigel RJ. 2006. Formation and prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions. J Surg Res. 132;1:3–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2005.12.002; PMid:16457846

4. Pouly JL, Darai E, Yazbeck C, Benifla JL, Dechaud H, Wattiez A, Crowe A and Audebert A. 2011. Postoperative abdominal adhesions and their prevention in gynaecological surgery: II. How can they be prevented? Gynecol Obstet Fertil.

5. Parker MC, Ellis H, Moran BJ, Thompson JN, Wilson MS, Menzies D, McGuire A, Lower AM, Hawthorn RJ, O’Briena F, Buchan S and Crowe AM. 2001. Postoperative adhesions: ten-year follow-up of 12,584 patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 44;6:822–29; discussion 829–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02234701; PMid:11391142

6. Lower AM, Hawthorn RJ, Ellis H, O’Brien F, Buchan S and Crowe AM. 2000. The impact of adhesions on hospital readmissions over ten years after 8849 open gynaecological operations: an assessment from the Surgical and Clinical Adhesions Research Study. Bjog. 107;7:855–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11083.x

7. Ellis H, Moran BJ, Thompson JN, Parker MC, Wilson MS, Menzies D, McGuire A, Lower AM, Hawthorn RJ, O’Brien F, Buchan S and Crowe AM. 1999. Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 353;9163:1476–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(98)09337-4

8. diZerega GS and Campeau JD. 2001. Peritoneal repair and post-surgical adhesion formation. Hum Reprod Update. 7;6:547–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/7.6.547

9. Volz J, Koster S, Weiss M, Schmidt R, Urbaschek R, Melchert F and Albrecht M. 1996. Pathophysiologic features of a pneumoperitoneum at laparoscopy: a swine model. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 174;1;1:132–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70385-X

10. West MA, Hackam DJ, Baker J, Rodriguez JL, Bellingham J and Rotstein OD. 1997. Mechanism of decreased in vitro murine macrophage cytokine release after exposure to carbon dioxide: relevance to laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg. 226;2:179–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199708000-00010

11. Binda MM and Koninckx PR. 2010. Hyperoxia and prevention of adhesion formation: a laparoscopic mouse model for open surgery. Bjog. 117;3:331–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02370.x; PMid:19832833

12. Taskin O, Buhur A, Birincioglu M, Burak F, Atmaca R, Yilmaz I and Wheeler JM. 1998. The effects of duration of CO2 insufflation and irrigation on peritoneal microcirculation assessed by free radical scavengers and total glutathion levels during operative laparoscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 5;2:129–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1074-3804(98)80078-9

13. Taskin O, Sadik S, Onoglu A, Gokdeniz R, Yilmaz I, Burak F and Wheeler JM. 1999. Adhesion formation after microlaparoscopic and laparoscopic ovarian coagulation for polycystic ovary disease. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 6;2:159–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1074-3804(99)80095-4

14. Yesildaglar N, Demirbag S, Pekcan M and Erogul O. 2003. Reduction of CO2-pneumoperitoneum-induced metabolic hypoxaemia by the addition of small amounts of O2 to the CO2 in a rabbit ventilated model. A preliminary study. Hum Reprod. 18;4:890; author reply 891.

15. Agdi M, Valenti D and Tulandi T. 2008. Intraabdominal adhesions after uterine artery embolization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 199;5:482 e1-3.

16. Payne JF and Haney AF. 2003. Serious complications of uterine artery embolization for conservative treatment of fibroids. Fertil Steril. 79;1:128–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(02)04398-4

17. Goldfarb HA. 2000. Myoma coagulation (myolysis). Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 27;2:421–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-8545(00)80032-7

18. Mais V, Angioli R, Coccia E, Fagotti A, Landi S, Melis GB, Pellicano M, Scambia G, Zupi E, Angioni S, Arena S, Corona R, Fanfani F and Nappi C. 2011. Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions in gynecological surgery. Consensus paper of an Italian gynecologists’ task force on adhesions. Minerva Ginecol. 63;1:47–70. PMid:21311420

19. Audebert A, Darai E, Benifla JL, Yazbeck C, Dechaud H, Wattiez A, Crowe A and Pouly JL. 2011. Postoperative abdominal adhesions and their prevention in gynaecological surgery: I. What should you know? Gynecol Obstet Fertil.

20. diZerega GS. 1994. Contemporary adhesion prevention. Fertil Steril. 61;2:219–35. PMid:8299773

21. Metwally M, Watson A, Lilford R and Vandekerckhove P. 2006. Fluid and pharmacological agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2:CD001298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd001298.pub3

22. El-Mowafi DM and Diamond MP. 2003. Are pelvic adhesions preventable? Surg Technol Int. 11:222–35. PMid:12931305

23. Risberg B. 1997. Adhesions: preventive strategies. Eur J Surg Suppl. 577:32–9. PMid:9076450

24. Saed GM, Jiang Z, Fletcher NM and Diamond MP. 2008. Modulation of the BCL-2/BAX ratio by interferon-gamma and hypoxia in human peritoneal and adhesion fibroblasts. Fertil Steril. 90;5:1925–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.091; PMid:17905238

25. Hague BA, Honnas CM, Berridge BR and Easter JL. 1998. Evaluation of postoperative peritoneal lavage in standing horses for prevention of experimentally induced abdominal adhesions. Vet Surg. 27;2:122–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.1998.tb00107.x

26. Duffy DM and diZerega GS. 1996. Adhesion controversies: pelvic pain as a cause of adhesions, crystalloids in preventing them. J Reprod Med. 41,1:19–26. PMid:8855072

27. Yaacobi Y, Goldberg EP and Habal MB. 1991. Effect of Ringer’s lactate irrigation on the formation of postoperative abdominal adhesions. J Invest Surg. 4;1:31–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/08941939109140759

28. Catena F, Ansaloni L, Di Saverio S and Pinna AD. 2012. P.O.P.A. Study: Prevention of Postoperative Abdominal Adhesions by Icodextrin 4% Solution After Laparotomy for Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction. A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 16;2:382–388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1736-y; PMid:22052104

29. Catena F, Ansaloni L, Lauro A, Ercolani G, D’Alessandro L and Pinna A. 2008. Prospective controlled randomized trial on prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by Icodextrin 4% solution after laparotomic operation for small bowel obstruction caused by adherences POPA study: Prevention of Postoperative Adhesions on behalf of the World Society of Emergency Surgery. Trials. 9:74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-9-74; PMid:19094225 PMCid:PMC2631497

30. Harris ES, Morgan RF and Rodeheaver GT. 1995. Analysis of the kinetics of peritoneal adhesion formation in the rat and evaluation of potential antiadhesive agents. Surgery 117;6:663–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6060(95)80010-7

31. Saravelos H and Li TC. 1996. Post-operative adhesions after laparoscopic electrosurgical treatment for polycystic ovarian syndrome with the application of Interceed to one ovary: a prospective randomized controlled study. Hum Reprod. 11;5:992–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019337

32. Pados G, Camus M, De Munck L and Devroey P. 1992. Laparoscopic application of interceed (TC7). Hum Reprod. 7,8:1141–3. PMid:1400939

33. Sawada T, Nishizawa H, Nishio E and Kadowaki M. 2000. Postoperative adhesion prevention with an oxidized regenerated cellulose adhesion barrier in infertile women. J Reprod Med. 45;5:387–9. PMid:10845171

34. Rajab TK, Wallwiener M, Planck C, Brochhausen C, Kraemer B and Wallwiener CW. 2010. A direct comparison of seprafilm, adept, intercoat, and spraygel for adhesion prophylaxis. J Surg Res. 161;2:246–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2008.11.839; PMid:19375716

35. Schonman R, Corona R, Bastidas A, De Cicco C, Mailova K and Koninckx PR. 2009. Intercoat gel (oxiplex): efficacy, safety, and tissue response in a laparoscopic mouse model. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 16;2:188–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2008.12.014; PMid:19249707

36. Farquhar C, Vandekerckhove P, Watson A, Vail A and Wiseman D. 2000. Barrier agents for preventing adhesions after surgery for subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2:CD000475. PMid:10796548

37. Haney AF, Hesla J, Hurst BS, Kettel LM, Murphy AA, Rock JA, Rowe G and Schlaff WD. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex Surgical Membrane) is superior to oxidized regenerated cellulose (Interceed TC7+) in preventing adhesions. Fertil Steril. 1995. 63;5:1021–6. PMid:7720911

38. Mettler L, Audebert A, Lehmann-Willenbrock E, Schive K and Jacobs VR. 2003. Prospective clinical trial of SprayGel as a barrier to adhesion formation: an interim analysis. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 10;3:339–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1074-3804(05)60258-7

39. Ustun C, Kocak I and Akpolat I. 2000. Effects of Seprafilm (sodium hyaluranate-based bioresorbable), Sepracoat (0.4% hyaluronic acid), and Ringer’s lactate on the prevention of postsurgical adhesion formation in rat models. J Obstet Gynaecol. 20;1:78–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01443610063543; PMid:15512475

40. Park JK, Yeom J, Hahn SK. 2010. Anti-Coagulating Hydroxyethyl Starch Blended with Hyaluronic Acid as A Novel Post-surgical Adhesion Barrier. Macromolecular Research. 18;11:1076–1080. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13233-010-1103-y