HEALTH OF WOMAN. 2016.9(115):159–163; doi 10.15574/HW.2016.115.159 
 

Insemination by husband’s sperm: fertility renewal in married couples with male infertility 
 

Gurzhenko YU. N., Кutsenko А. О.

National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education P. L. Shupyk, Kiev

The objective: analysis of the results in the resumption of fertility of infertile couples with male factor with a program of insemination with husband's sperm.

Patients and methods. There are analyzed the results of achievement of genital function in 140 married couples with man’s infertility who in 2013–2015 underwent the program of insemination by man’s sperm at the Institute of Reproductive Medicine (Kyiv).

Results. It has been stated that the pregnancy number and births after 3 attempts (420 cycles) with 3–5 month interval was reached in 17.0±1.8% and 15.0±1.8% of cases, respectively.

There was confirmed the linear dependence between the fact of renewal of fertility and such factor as an age of a woman, duration of absence of native pregnancy, response of ovular function on stimulation. There was objectivized the influence on the result of readings of a spectrogram: the kind of pathospermia, the concentration of spermatozoons which is in the inverse dependence on the presence of predictors and determinants aggravating the total state of a man, and also the percent of actively movable fractions of sperms.

Conclusions. Confirmed a causal relationship the result with such factors as age of women, duration of occurrence of natural pregnancy, ovulatory response to the stimulation. However, it is crucial to objectively brought the semen: patospermia, concentration of sperm and percentage of actively motile fractions thereof, as well as overall health of men.

Key words: male infertility factor, insemination by man’s sperm, result.

REFERENCES

1. Gasparov AS, Nazarenko TA. 2001. Reproduktivnoe zdorove. Besplodie kak mediko- sotsialnaya problema: Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo. M, Meditsina:56.

2. Vladychenko KA, Yuzko VO, Savchuk LT. 2015. Analiz spermohram Medychnoho tsentru likuvannia bezpliddia za 2010–2014 rr. Zdorove muzhchynы 3:140–141.

3. Dakhno FV. 2011. Dopomizhni reproduktyvni tekhnolohii likuvannia bezpliddia: navchalnyi posibnyk. Za red. prof. FV Dakhna, chl.-kor. NAMN Ukrainy, prof. VV Kaminskoho, prof. OM Yuzka. K, Zdorov’ia:338.

4. Zaporozhan VM. 2008. Patohenetychni osnovy novykh tekhnolohii diahnostyky ta likuvannia patolohii reproduktyvnoi systemy. Fiziol. zhurn. 4:48.

5. Korsak VS, Isakova EV. 2011. Besplodie: voprosyi i otvetyi: spravochnik. M, Medkniga:160.

6. Nikiforov DV, Ryabchikova EI, Ovsyannikova TV, Popova ZhYu. 2015. EKO: istoriya korotkoy vstrechi. Nauka iz pervyih ruk 62;2:104–111.

7. Tamazyan GV. 2010. Mediko-organizatsionnyie podhodyi k resheniyu problemyi besplodiya s primeneniem vspomogatelnyih reproduktivnyih tehnologiy. Ros. vestnik akushera-ginekologa 10;2:10–12.

8. Chernyishova ML. 2011. Sotsialno-gigienicheskie aspektyi besplodiya u muzhchin. Avtoref. diss. kand. med. nauk: 14.01.40 – Urologiya. M:21.

9. Shahova MA. 2007. Vspomogatelnyie reproduktivnyie tehnologii v brake pri muzhskom besplodii. Avtoref. diss. d-ra med. nauk: 14.00.01 – Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. M:36.

10. Shibaeva KS. 2011. Besplodnyiy brak kak trudnaya zhiznennaya situatsiya. Eur. Social Science J. 12(15):292–300.

11. Barazani Y, Agarwal A, Sabanegh ES et al. 2014. Functional sperm testing and the role of proteomics in the evaluation of male infertility. J. Urol. 84:255–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2014.04.043; PMid:25065986

12. Davies MJ, Moore VM, Willson KJ, Van Essen P et al. 2012. Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects. N. Engl. J. Med. 366(19):1803–13. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1008095; PMid:22559061

13. Denschlag D et al. 2004. Assisted reproductive techniques in patients with Klinefelter syndrome: a critical review. Fertil Steril. 82(4):312–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.09.085; PMid:15482743

14. Garg Н, Kumar R. 2015, Aug 5. Empirical Drug Therapy for Idiopathic Male Infertility: What is the New Evidence? Urology. p.ii: S0090-4295(15)00714-1.

15. Jungwirth A (Ed.), Diemer T, Dohle GR et al. 2015. Guidelines on Male Infertility. Eur. Association Urology: 42.