Paediatric Surgery (Ukraine). 2025. 1(86): 88-93. doi: 10.15574/PS.2025.1(86).8893
Shevchuk D. V.¹, Hrytsyna I. V.^2,3, Ovechko M. Ye.¹, Dyatel V. V.¹, Krupach A. M.¹, Guziy O. V.¹, Kyslova Yu. O.¹, Hrytskiv L. V.¹, Chaplya I. I.¹, Lototska I. S.¹, Zolotukhin O. S.^2
1Public Hospital "First Medical Union of Lviv", Ukraine
²Danylo Halytsky National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine
³Pathomorphological Laboratory "Good Diagnostics", Lviv, Ukraine

For citation: Shevchuk DV, Hrytsyna IV, Ovechko MYe, Dyatel VV, Krupach AM, Guziy OV et al. (2025). Biopsy of the transplanted kidney: current state of the issue (experience of the transplantation center). Paediatric Surgery (Ukraine). 1(86): 88-93. doi: 10.15574/PS.2025.1(86).8893.
Article received: Nov 17, 2024. Accepted for publication: Mar 18, 2025.

Kidney transplant rejection is the main cause of graft dysfunction and kidney transplantation failure. Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) are the most important causes of graft rejection. Other causes of graft loss include vascular thrombosis, urinary tract obstruction and nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors.
Aim – to present the experience of performing transplanted kidney biopsies in patients of different ages in a single transplantation center to study the feasibility of performing protocol biopsies.
Materials and methods. Since 2020, we have performed 332 kidney transplantations. Of these, 21 (6.3%) were kidney transplants in children. Over the past three years, 89 transplanted kidney biopsies have been histologically examined, of which 8 (9%) were pediatric. Among them, 10 (11.2%) were repeat (second).
Results. The vast majority of results were isolated AMR (67.6% before 14 days and 57.9% after 14 days). Suspected TCMR was observed in 10.6% of biopsies. 34 (38.2%) biopsies were performed in the first 14 days after transplantation. Among them, isolated active AMR was diagnosed in 23 (67.6%) cases, combined rejection was detected in five (14.7%) cases, microvascular inflammation (C4d negative) in three (8.8%) cases, active AMR combined with suspected TCMR was detected in two (5.8%) cases, and there were no signs of rejection in one (2.9%) case. Another 19 (21.3%) biopsies were performed between 14 and 100 days, where in 11 (57.9%) cases isolated AMR was diagnosed, in three (15.8%) cases a combination of AMR and suspected TCMR was detected, in two (10.5%) cases combined rejection was observed, in another two (10.5%) cases microvascular inflammation (C4d negative) was observed and in 1 (5.3%) case signs of immunological rejection were absent.
Conclusions. Signs of rejection of the transplanted kidney are more often observed in children, which requires an earlier approach to performing a biopsy (protocol biopsy option). In the first 100 days after transplantation, when performing a biopsy in patients with impaired graft function, in most cases, active AMR is detected. However, a fairly large proportion also accounts for cases of combined rejection, suspected TCMR and cases of absent immunological rejection, which confirms the appropriateness of using biopsy “on demand”.
The study was performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee of the mentioned institutions. Informed consent of the patients was obtained for the study.
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Keywords: kidney transplantation, biopsy, rejection.

REFERENCES

1. Bu L, Gupta G, Pai A, Anand S, Stites E, Moinuddin I et al. (2022). Clinical outcomes from the Assessing Donor-derived cell-free DNA Monitoring Insights of kidney Allografts with Longitudinal surveillance (ADMIRAL) study. Kidney International. 101(4): 793-803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2021.11.034; PMid:34953773

2. Chen CC, Lin WC, Lee CY, Yang CY, Tsai MK. (2021). Two-year protocol biopsy after kidney transplantation in clinically stable recipients – a retrospective study. Transplant International : Official Journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation. 34(1): 185-193. https://doi.org/10.1111/tri.13785; PMid:33152140

3. Choi YJ, Chakraborty S, Nguyen V, Nguyen C, Kim BK, Shim SI et al. (2000). Peritubular capillary loss is associated with chronic tubulointerstitial injury in human kidney: Altered expression of vascular endothelial growth factor. Human Pathology. 31(12): 1491-1497. https://doi.org/10.1053/hupa.2000.20373; PMid:11150374

4. El-Zoghby ZM, Stegall MD, Lager DJ, Kremers WK, Amer H et al. (2009). Identifying specific causes of kidney allograft loss. American Journal of Transplantation : Official Journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. 9(3): 527-535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02519.x; PMid:19191769

5. Ishii Y, Sawada T, Kubota K, Fuchinoue S, Teraoka S, Shimizu A. (2005). Injury and progressive loss of peritubular capillaries in the development of chronic allograft nephropathy. Kidney International. 67(1): 321-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00085.x; PMid:15610258

6. Ivanov DD, Vanholder R, Lagodich E, Levtchenko E, Pawlowicz-Szlarska E, Sever MS et al. (2024). WCN24-544 nephrology care management in the ukrainian war: 2 years experience. Kidney International Reports. 9(4): S243-S244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2024.02.500

7. Lee O, Kim MJ, Lee JE, Hwang NY, Kim K et al. (2023). The Protective Role of Protocol Biopsy for Allograft Kidney Maintenance in Kidney Transplantation. Transplantation Proceedings. 55(4): 756-768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.01.029; PMid:36990887

8. Lerut E, Naesens M, Kuypers DR, Vanrenterghem Y, Van Damme B. (2007). Subclinical peritubular capillaritis at 3 months is associated with chronic rejection at 1 year. Transplantation. 83(11): 1416-1422. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.tp.0000266676.10550.70; PMid:17565313

9. Lohéac C, Aubert O, Loupy A, Legendre C. (2018). Etude des etiologies specifiques de perte des greffons renaux: place du rejet medie par les anticorps et approche en population. Nephrologie & Therapeutique. 14: S39-S50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nephro.2018.02.018; PMid:29606262

10. Moein M, Papa S, Ortiz N, Saidi R. (2023). Protocol Biopsy After Kidney Transplant: Clinical Application and Efficacy to Detect Allograft Rejection. Cureus. 15(2). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.34505; PMid:36874304 PMCid:PMC9983784

11. Naesens M, Kuypers DRJ, De Vusser K, Evenepoel P, Claes K, Bammens B et al. (2014). The histology of kidney transplant failure: A long-term follow-up study. Transplantation. 98(4): 427-435. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000000183; PMid:25243513

12. Nakonechnyy R, Shevchuk D, Nakonechnyi A, Kuzyk A, Vivcharivskyi T. (2024). MP55-17 early results of a pediatric transplant program during wartime in Ukraine: a cohort study. The Journal of Urology. 211(5S): e923. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JU.0001008616.01808.0f.17

13. Nankivell BJ, Agrawal N, Sharma A, Taverniti A, P'Ng CH, Shingde M et al. (2019). The clinical and pathological significance of borderline T cell-mediated rejection. American Journal of Transplantation. 19(5): 1452-1463. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.15197; PMid:30501008

14. Sakai K, Oguchi H, Muramatsu M, Shishido S. (2018). Protocol graft biopsy in kidney transplantation. Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.). 23; Suppl 2: 38-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/nep.13282; PMid:29968403

15. Shimizu A, Yamada K, Sachs DH, Colvin RB. (2002). Persistent rejection of peritubular capillaries and tubules is associated with progressive interstitial fibrosis. Kidney International. 61(5): 1867-1879. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00309.x; PMid:11967039

16. Steegh FMEG, Gelens MACJ, Nieman FHM, Van Hooff JP, Cleutjens JPM, Van Suylen RJ et al. (2011). Early loss of peritubular capillaries after kidney transplantation. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 22(6): 1024-1029. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2010050531; PMid:21566051 PMCid:PMC3374365

17. Vanhove T, Goldschmeding R, Kuypers D. (2017). Kidney Fibrosis: Origins and Interventions. Transplantation. 101(4): 713-726. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000001608; PMid:27941433 PMCid:PMC7228593

18. Van Loon E, Bernards J, Van Craenenbroeck AH, Naesens M. (2020). The Causes of Kidney Allograft Failure: More Than Alloimmunity. A Viewpoint Article. Transplantation. 104(2): E46-E56. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000003012; PMid:32000235