HEALTH OF WOMAN. 2016.9(115):86–93; doi 10.15574/HW.2016.115.86

Clinical-anamnestic analysis of the course and treatment of benign and borderline epithelial ovarian tumors

Yegorov M. Yu., Sukhanova A. A.

National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education P. L. Shupyk, Kiev

The objective: study the features of gynecological, physical history, diagnosis and treatment of patients with benign epithelial ovarian tumors (BeEOT) and borderline epithelial ovarian tumors (BEOT), determining the frequency of recurrence of ovarian tumors in the postoperative period.

Patients and methods. According to a retrospective analysis of case histories of 112 women with epithelial ovarian tumors (EOT) underwent conservative or radical surgical treatment in a hospital, two groups were formed: I group – patients with benign epithelial ovarian tumors (BeEOT), which amounted to 85 (75.9%) women, and group II – patients with borderline epithelial ovarian tumors (BEOT), which amounted to 27 (24.1%) women. It was found that the main complaints of patients with EOT were pain (49.1%), abdominal distension (17%), and abnormal uterine bleeding (12.5%). The highest incidence of BeEOT (31.8%) observed in the age group of 41–50 years, while the peak incidence of BEOT (44.4%) corresponds to the age group of 51–60 years.

Results. In BEOT endocrine pathology occurs significantly more frequently (p<0.05) than in BeEOT – 25.9% vs. 9.4%, respectively. Pathology of pancreatic-hepatobiliary system occurs significantly more frequently (p<0.05) in patients with BEOT compared with BeEOT – 81.5% versus 57.6%, respectively. Venous disorders (varicose veins of the pelvic organs, lower limbs, haemorrhoids) observed in BEOT significantly more frequently (p<0.05) than in BeEOT – 18.5% vs. 5.9%, respectively. EOT most often diagnosed in the period from 1 to 6 months after the first clinical manifestations with an average uptake of medical care 4.6±0.57 months. In assessing of peritoneal exudate cytogram the mesothelium cells are significantly more common for BeEOT (p<0.01) than BEOT – 79.4% versus 40.9%, respectively. Cervicitis is more likely significantly to occur in BeEOT (p<0.01) than in BEOT – 29.4% vs. 7.4%, respectively. The most common histological type among the benign tumors of the ovaries are endometriomas, which occurred in 48.2% of all BeEOT cases, and among the borderline tumors – serous tumors, which accounted for 59.3% of all BEOTs.

Conclusion. The use of organ sparing surgery in EOT increases the risk of recurrence, especially in the case of endometrial histology or borderline variant of tumor.

Key words: benign and borderline epithelial ovarian tumors, clinical-anamnestic analysis, diagnosis, treatment.

REFERENCES

1. Abdullaeva LM. 2012. Kliniko-gistologicheskaya harakteristika dobrokachestvennyih obrazovaniy yaichnikov. Zdorove zhenschinyi 2 (68):197–198.

2. Aleksandrov AL. 2007. Sovremennyie podhodyi k diagnostike dobrokachestvennyih opuholey yaichnikov. Odeskiy medichniy zhurnal 4 (102): 79–84.

3. Bozhenko OIu. 2014. Optymizatsiia metodiv diahnostyky pukhlyn yaiechnykiv ta vyznachennia pidkhodiv do khirurhichnoho likuvannia. Avtoref. dys. kand. med. nauk. K:20.

4. Dubinina VH, Aleksandrov OL. 2010. Mozhlyvi shliakhy vdoskonalennia dyferentsialnoi diahnostyky dobroiakisnykh novoutvoren yaiechnykiv. Zdorove zhenshchynы 10 (56): 213–215.

5. Klymenko ES. 2015. Kliniko-morfolohichni kryterii prohnozu perebihu hranychnykh pukhlyn yaiechnyka. Avtoref. dys. kand. med. nauk. Kharkiv: 20.

6.Kuprienko NV, Malik AV. 2013. Naibolee znachimyie variantyi kompleksnogo lecheniya mutsinoznyih opuholey yaichnikov. UnIversitetska klInIka 1 (9): 111–114.

7. Logutova LS, Popov AA, Petruhin VA i soavt. 2014. Hirurgicheskoe lechenie beremennyih s dobrokachestvennyimi opuholyami yaichnikov. Voprosyi onkologii 3 (60): 392–395.

8. Neyshtadt EL, Ozhiganova IN. 2014. Opuholi yaichnika. SPb, OOO «Izdatelstvo FOLIANT»: 352.

9. Novikova EG, Shevchuk AS, Zavalishina LE. 2010. Nekotoryie aspektyi organosohranyayuschego lecheniya pogranichnyih opuholey yaichnikov. Ross. onkol. zhurn. 4: 15–20.

10. Nosenko EN. 2008. Nekotoryie voprosyi sovremennoy klassifikatsii, epidemiologii i patogeneza dobrokachestvennyih kistoznyih obrazovaniy yaichnikov u devochek-podrostkov i zhenschin aktivnogo reproduktivnogo vozrasta. Novosti meditsiny i farmatsii. Ginekologiya: 253. http://www.mif-ua.com/archive/article/5992

11. Sinenko NO. 2009. Optymizatsiia taktyky vedennia khvorykh z dobroiakisnymy i pohranychnymy pukhlynamy ta pukhlynopodibnymy novoutvorenniamy yaiechny-kiv. Avtoref. dys. kand. med. nauk. K: 19.

12. Yaroschuk TM, Bolgova LS. 2013. Tsitologicheskaya diagnostika opuholey yaichnika. Onkologiya 3: 178–183.

13. Crum CP, Drapkin R, Miron A, Ince TA, Muto M, Kindelberger DW, Lee Y. 2007. The distal fallopian tube: a new model for pelvic serous carcinogenesis. Curr Opin Obstet Ginecol. 19 (1): 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0b013e328011a21f; PMid:17218844

14. Laculle-Massin C, Collinet P, Faye N. 2013, Dec. Diagnosis of presumed benign ovarian tumors. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, Paris. 42(8):760–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgyn.2013.09.031; PMid:24210239

15. Longacre TA, Gilks CB. 2009. Surface epithelial stromal tumours of ovary. In: Nucci MR, Olivia E (eds), Gynecologic pathology. Elsevier Churchill Living stone: 390–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044306920-8.50015-8

16. May A, Love K, Gull S. 2011, Aug. Comparing ascitic aspirate and tissue biopsy in the diagnosis of ovarian malignancy. J Obstet Gynecol. 31(6): 535–8. https://doi.org/10.3109/01443615.2011.581318; PMid:21823859

17. Piek JM, van Diest PJ, Verheijen RH. 2008. Ovarian carcinogenesis: An alternative hypothesis. Adv Exp Med Biol 622: 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68969-2_7; PMid:18546620