Paediatric Surgery (Ukraine). 2022. 1(74): 79-86; doi 10.15574/PS.2022.74.79
Nakonechnyi Y. A., Nakonechnyy R. A.
Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Ukraine

For citation: Nakonechnyi YA, Nakonechnyy RA. (2022). Ultrasonography of the testicles in the context of laparoscopic treatment of left-sided varicocele. Paediatric Surgery (Ukraine). 1(74): 79-86; doi 10.15574/PS.2022.74.79.
Article received: Aug 16, 2021. Accepted for publication: Jan 06, 2022.

Purpose – to determine significant sonographic pathogenetic markers of infertility formation in left-sided varicocele of II-III grades and their dynamics after laparoscopic varicocelectomy in the context of fertility restoration.
Materials and methods. In the study, 214 patients with left-sided varicocele II-III grades and 25 practically healthy men aged 19 to 33 years were examined. All patients underwent laparoscopic varicocelectomy.
The testes volume, the resistance index in the intratesticular arteries, and the diameter of the varicose veins of the left spermatic cord at rest in a horizontal position on the back with the head raised by 15° and during the Valsalva maneuver in a vertical position. During Valsalva maneuver also determined the duration and rate of venous blood reflux in the testes.
Results. Ultrasound in patients with left varicocele II-III grades confirmed deterioration of hemodynamics in the spermatic cord and testis. According to the results of sonography in patients with left varicocele II-III grades identified significant prognostic markers of testicular lesions: RI>0.66, VD>2.4 mm, VDvm>3 mm, VRFvm>2 cm/s, and DVR>1.1 s. The negative dynamics of these indicators are an indication for the correction of varicocele, and their normalization in the postoperative period indicates the effectiveness of treatment.
Conclusions. Testicular ultrasound is more informative than palpation. In patients of reproductive age with left-sided varicocele II-III grades sonography diagnoses testicular tissue damage in the early stages of the disease. It should be used as a non-invasive screening method for a comprehensive examination to determine testicular lesions and for monitoring in the context of fertility prognosis after varicocelectomy.
The research was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki declaration. The study protocol was approved by the Local ethics committee of all participating institution. The informed consent of the patient was obtained for conducting the studies.
No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Key words: varicocele, laparoscopic varicocelectomy, ultrasound examination, testicles.

REFERENCES

1. Biagiotti G, Cavallini G, Modenini F, Vitali G, Gianaroli L. (2002). Spermatogenesis and spectral echo‐colour Doppler traces from the main testicular artery. BJU international. 90 (9): 903-908. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410X.2002.03033.x; PMid:12460354

2. Chiba K, Fujisawa M. (2016). Clinical outcomes of varicocele repair in infertile men: a review. The world journal of men's health. 34 (2): 101-109. https://doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.2016.34.2.101; PMid:27574593 PMCid:PMC4999483

3. Dohle GR, Colpi GM, Hargreave TB, Papp GK, Jungwirth A, Weidner W, EAU Working Group on Male Infertility. (2005). EAU guidelines on male infertility. European urology. 48 (5): 703-711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2005.06.002; PMid:16005562

4. Goren MR, Erbay G, Ozer C, Kayra MV, Hasirci E. (2016). Can we predict the outcome of varicocelectomy based on the duration of venous reflux? Urology. 88: 81-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2015.11.032; PMid:26683753

5. Iosa G, Lazzarini D. (2013). Hemodynamic classification of varicoceles in men: our experience. Journal of ultrasound. 16 (2): 57-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-013-0016-y; PMid:24294344 PMCid:PMC3774905

6. Kim YS, Kim SK, Cho IC, Min SK. (2015). Efficacy of scrotal Doppler ultrasonography with the Valsalva maneuver, standing position, and resting-Valsalva ratio for varicocele diagnosis. Korean journal of urology. 56 (2): 144-149. https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2015.56.2.144; PMid:25685302 PMCid:PMC4325119

7. Kocakoc E, Kiris A, Orhan I, Bozgeyik Z, Kanbay M, Ogur E. (2002). Incidence and importance of reflux in testicular veins of healthy men evaluated with color duplex sonography. Journal of clinical ultrasound. 30 (5): 282-287. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.10068; PMid:12116108

8. Lorenc T, Krupniewski L, Palczewski P, Gołębiowski M. (2016). The value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of varicocele. Journal of ultrasonography. 16 (67): 359-370. https://doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2016.0036; PMid:28138407 PMCid:PMC5269523

9. Pauroso S, Di Leo N, Fulle I, Di Segni M, Alessi S, Maggini E. (2011). Varicocele: Ultrasonographic assessment in daily clinical practice. Journal of ultrasound. 14 (4): 199-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jus.2011.08.001; PMid:23396816 PMCid:PMC3558097

10. Pilatz A, Altinkilic B, Köhler E, Marconi M, Weidner W. (2011). Color Doppler ultrasound imaging in varicoceles: is the venous diameter sufficient for predicting clinical and subclinical varicocele? World Journal of Urology. 29 (5): 645-650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0701-4; PMid:21607575

11. Pinggera GM, Mitterberger M, Bartsch G et al. (2008). Assessment of the intratesticular resistive index by colour Doppler ultrasonography measurements as a predictor of spermatogenesis. BJU international. 101 (6): 722-726. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07343.x; PMid:18190642

12. Rebrova O. (2002). Statistical analysis of medical data. Moscow: MediaSphere: 312.

13. Rehman KU, Zaneb H, Qureshi AB et al. (2019). Correlation between testicular hemodynamic and semen quality indices in clinical varicocele patients in Pakistan. BioMed research international. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7934328; PMid:30984784 PMCid:PMC6431503

14. Rowe PJ, Comhaire FH, Hargreave TB, Mahmoud AM. (2000). WHO manual for the standardized investigation and diagnosis of the infertile male. Cambridge university press: 102.

15. Schoonjans F, Zalata A, Depuydt CE, Comhaire FH. (1995). MedCalc: a new computer program for medical statistics. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine. 48 (3): 257-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2607(95)01703-8

16. Semiz I, Tokgöz Ö, Tokgoz H, Voyvoda N, Serifoglu I, Erdem Z. (2014). The investigation of correlation between semen analysis parameters and intraparenchymal testicular spectral Doppler indices in patients with clinical varicocele. Ultrasound quarterly. 30 (1): 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000055; PMid:24901777

17. Stahl P, Schlegel PN. (2011). Standardization and documentation of varicocele evaluation. Current opinion in urology. 21 (6): 500-505. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0b013e32834b8698; PMid:21926627

18. Ur Rehman K, Qureshi AB, Numan A et al. (2018). Pressure flow pattern of varicocele veins and its correlation with testicular blood flow and semen parameters. Andrologia. 50: 2. https://doi.org/10.1111/and.12856; PMid:28766734

19. Will MA, Swain J, Fode M, Sonksen J, Christman GM, Ohl D. (2011). The great debate: varicocele treatment and impact on fertility. Fertility and sterility. 95 (3): 841-852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.01.002; PMid:21272869 PMCid:PMC3046876

20. Zhang M, Du L, Liu Z, Qi H, Chu Q. (2014). The effects of varicocelectomy on testicular arterial blood flow: laparoscopic surgery versus microsurgery. Urology journal. 11 (5): 1900-1906.

21. Zumrutbas AE, Resorlu B, Yesil M, Yaman O. (2008). Is the presence of venous reflux really significant in the diagnosis of varicocele? International urology and nephrology. 40 (4): 983-987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-008-9397-9; PMid:18500566