- The state of the provisional organs in the fetus with vital and lethal anomalies (literature review)
The state of the provisional organs in the fetus with vital and lethal anomalies (literature review)
Ukrainian Journal of Perinatology and Pediatrics. 2021.4(88): 44-51; doi 10.15574/PP.2021.88.44.
Grebinichenko G. O., Gordienko I. Yu., Luk'yanova I. S., Dzyuba O. M., Medvedenko G. F.
SI «Institute of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology named after academician O.M. Lukyanova of the NAMS of Ukraine», Kyiv
For citation: Grebinichenko GO, Gordienko IYu, Luk'yanova IS, Dzyuba OM, Medvedenko GF. (2021). The state of the provisional organs in the fetus with vital and lethal anomalies (literature review). Ukrainian Journal of Perinatology and Pediatrics. 4(88): 44-51. doi 10.15574/PP.2021.88.44.
Article received: Jul 22, 2021. Accepted for publication: Dec 07, 2021.
Provisional organs (placenta, umbilical cord, amniotic membranes, amniotic fluid) play a significant role during pregnancy. Their normal morpho3functional state is an important condition for normal development and well3being of the fetus, as well as for uncomplicated course of pregnancy. Congenital malformations (CM) and chromosomal abnormalities are major causes of perinatal morbidity and mortality. For fetuses with malformations, dysfunction of the provisional organs (PO) can become critical and affect survival. Expert correct examination of PO during a comprehensive prenatal examination can become a diagnostic and prognostic tool for specialized management of fetuses as patients, and newborns to optimize the system of prenatal dispensary evaluation.
Literature review has shown that there are certain patterns of the PO pathology in cases of fetal abnormal development, which require changes in the tactics of prenatal observation and delivery. The variability of morphological/ultrasound changes and clinical outcomes makes it difficult to reach definite diagnosis and make correct decisions about the management of patients in specific cases. Further research is needed to optimize the protocols of ultrasound examinations and prediction of perinatal complications in the pathology of the PO in fetuses with normal and abnormal development.
No conflict of interests were declared by the authors.
Key words: prenatal diagnosis, provisional organs, placenta, umbilical cord, amniotic membrane, amniotic fluid, vital and lethal congenital malformations, perinatal consequences, fetus.
REFERENСES
1. Abdalla N, Bachanek M, Trojanowski S et al. (2014). Placental tumor (chorioangioma) as a cause of polyhydramnios: a case report. Int J Womens Health. 6: 955-959. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S72178; PMid:25429242 PMCid:PMC4242403
2. Alfirevic Z, Tang AW, Collins SL et al. (2016). Pro forma for ultrasound reporting in suspected abnormally invasive placenta (AIP): an international consensus: Ad hoc international AIP expert group. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 47 (3): 276-278. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15810; PMid:26564315
3. Benirschke K, Kaufmann P, Baergen R. (2006). Pathology of the Human Placenta. 5th edition. Springer, New York: 1069.
4. Berg C, Gembruch O, Gembruch U et al. (2009). Doppler indices of the middle cerebral artery in fetuses with cardiac defects theoretically associated with impaired cerebral oxygen delivery in utero: is there a brain-sparing effect? Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 34 (6): 666-672. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.7474; PMid:19953563
5. Bosselmann S, Mielke G. (2015). Sonographic Assessment of the Umbilical Cord. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde. 75 (8): 808-818. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1557819; PMid:26366000 PMCid:PMC4554503
6. Cunha Castro EC, Popek E. (2018). Abnormalities of placenta implantation. APMIS. 126 (7): 613-620. https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.12831; PMid:30129132
7. Dolk H, Loane M, Garne E. (2011). Congenital Heart Defects in Europe Prevalence and Perinatal Mortality, 2000 to 2005. Circulation. 123: 841-849. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.958405; PMid:21321151
8. Dubiel M, Breborowicz GH, Marsal K, Gudmundsson S. (2000). Fetal adrenal and middlecelebral artery Doppler velosimetry in high-risk pregnancy. Ultrasoud in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 16 (5): 414-418. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00278.x; PMid:11169324
9. Ebbing C, Kiserud T, Johnsen SL et al. (2013). Prevalence, Risk Factors and Outcomes of Velamentous and Marginal Cord Insertions: A Population-Based Study of 634, 741 Pregnancies. PLoS ONE. 8 (7): e70380. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070380; PMid:23936197 PMCid:PMC3728211
10. Elsayes KM, Trout AT, Friedkin AM et al. (2009). Imaging of the placenta: a multimodality pictorial review. Radiographics: A Review Publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 29 (5): 1371-1391. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.295085242; PMid:19755601
11. Fadl S, Moshiri M, Fligner CL et al. (2017). Placental Imaging: Normal Appearance with Review of Pathologic Findings. RadioGraphics. 37 (3): 979-998. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2017160155; PMid:28493802
12. Gordienko IYu, Sopko NІ, Lutsenko SV, Archakova TN. (1993). Ul'trazvukovaya diagnostika gemangiom platsenty, patologii pupoviny i ikh svyaz' s narusheniem razvitiya ploda. Ul'trazvukovaya perinatal'naya diagnostika. (2,3): 25-27.
13. Gratacos EA. (2007). Classification system for selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic pregnancies according to umbilical artery Doppler flow in the smaller twin. Gratacos E et al. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. (30): 28-34. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.4046; PMid:17542039
14. Hammad IA, Blue NR, Allshouse AA et al. (2020). Umbilical Cord Abnormalities and Stillbirth. NICHD Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network Group. Obstet Gynecol. 135 (3): 644-652. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003676; PMid:32028503 PMCid:PMC7036034
15. Hasegawa J, Matsuoka R, Ichizuka K et al. (2006). Velamentous cord insertion into the lower third of the uterus is associated with intrapartum fetal heart rate abnormalities. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 27 (4): 425-429. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.2645; PMid:16479618
16. Houlihan OA, O'Donoghue K. (2013). The natural history of pregnancies with a diagnosis of Trisomy 18 or Trisomy 13; a retrospective case series. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 13 (1): 209. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-209; PMid:24237681 PMCid:PMC3840564
17. Jauniaux E, Hustin J. (1998). Chromosomally abnormal early ongoing pregnancies: correlation of ultrasound and placental histological findings. Human Pathology. 29 (11): 1195-1199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0046-8177(98)90245-3
18. Khalil A, Rodgers M, Baschat A, Bhide A, Gratacos E, Hecher K, Kilby MD, Lewi L, Nicolaides KH, Oepkes D, Raine-Fenning N, Reed K, Salomon LJ, Sotiriadis A, Thilaganathan B, Ville Y. (2016). ISUOG Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 47: 247-263. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15821; PMid:26577371
19. Kohari KS, Roman AS, Fox NS et al. (2012). Persistence of placenta previa in twin gestations based on gestational age at sonographic detection. J Ultrasound Med. 31: 985-989. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2012.31.7.985; PMid:22733846
20. Lakovschek IC, Streubel B, Ulm B. (2011). Natural outcome of trisomy 13, trisomy 18, and triploidy after prenatal diagnosis. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A. 155 (11): 2626-2633. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.34284; PMid:21990236
21. Loosa RJF, Deroma C, Deroma R, Vlietinck R. (2001). Birthweight in live-born twins: the infuence of the umbilical cord insertion and fusion of placentas. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 108: 943-948. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-5456(01)00220-0
22. Lukianova IS, Truba YP, Medvedenko GF, Zhadan OD, Ivanova LA. (2015). Congenital anomalies of the aortic arch: perinatal management. Perinatologіya i pedіatrіya. 2 (62): 16-21. https://doi.org/10.15574/PP.2015.62.16
23. Lukyanova IS, Medvedenko GF, Zhuravel' IA, Tarasyuk BA, Ivanova LA. (2016). Prenatal'nye i postnatal'nye paralleli pri kriticheskikh vrozhdennykh porokakh serdtsa u ploda. Akusherstvo, gіnekologіya, genetika. 3 (2): 31-38.
24. Massalska D. (2020). Maternal complications in molecularly confirmed diandric and digynic triploid pregnancies: single institution experience and literature review. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics: 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05515-4; PMid:32219520 PMCid:PMC7181501
25. Milovanov AP. (2019). Tsitotrofoblasticheskaya invaziya – vazhneishii mekhanizm platsentatsii i progressii beremennosti. Arkhiv patologii. 81 (4): 5-10. https://doi.org/10.17116/patol2019810415; PMid:31407711
26. Nagamatsu T, Kamei Y, Yamashita T, Fujii T, Kozuma S. (2014). Placental abnormalities detected by ultrasonography in a case of confined placental mosaicism for trisomy 2 with severe fetal growth restriction. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 40 (1): 279-283. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.12145; PMid:24033883
27. Nayeri UA, West AB, Nardini HKG et al. (2012). Systematic review of sonographic findings of placental mesenchymal dysplasia and subsequent pregnancy outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol: 10. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.12359; PMid:23239538
28. Nekrasova ES. (2009). Mnogoplodnaya beremennost'. 1-e izd. Moskva. Real Taim: 144.
29. Nyberg DA, McGahan JP, Pretorius DH, Pilu G. (2003). Diagnostic imaging of fetal anomalies. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: 1102.
30. Overton TG, Denbow ML, Duncan KR, Fisk NM. (1999). First trimester cord entanglement in monoamniotic twins. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 13: 140-142. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.13020140.x; PMid:10079495
31. Pinar H, Carpenter M. (2010). Placenta and umbilical cord abnormalities seen with stillbirth. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology. 53 (3): 656-672. https://doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181eb68fe; PMid:20661050
32. Ples L, Sima RM, Moisei C et al. (2017). Abnormal ultrasound appearance of the amniotic membranes – diagnostic and significance: a pictorial essay. Medical Ultrasonography. 19 (2): 211. https://doi.org/10.11152/mu-844; PMid:28440356
33. Quintero RA. (1999). Staging of twin$twin transfusion syndrome. J Perinatol. 19: 550-555. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7200292; PMid:10645517
34. Rabie N, Magann E, Steelman S et al. (2017). Oligohydramnios in complicated and uncomplicated pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis: Oligohydramnios in complicated and uncomplicated pregnancy. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 49 (4): 442-449. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15929; PMid:27062200
35. Radzinskiy VE, Milovanova AP. (2004). Ekstraembrional'nye i okoloplodnye struktury pri normal'noi i oslozhnennoi beremennosti. Moskva: meditsinskoe informatsionnoe agentstvo: 393.
36. Rocha A, Rodrigues M do C, Braga J. (2017). Umbilical Cord Hemangioma with Pseudocyst: An Exceptional Finding. Acta Medica Portuguesa. 30 (9): 662. https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.9274; PMid:29025535
37. Sadler TW. (2012). Medical Embryology. Langman's. 12th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Wolters Kluwer: Baltimore, Philadelphia: 400.
38. Shah SI, Dyer L, Stanek J. (2018). Placental Histomorphology in a Case of Double Trisomy 48, XXX,+18. Case Reports in Pathology. 2 (4): 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2839765; PMid:29707399 PMCid:PMC5863320
39. Sherer DM, Dalloul M, Ward K et al. (2017). Coexisting true umbilical cord knot and nuchal cord: possible cumulative increased risk of adverse perinatal outcome: Coexisting true umbilical cord knot and nuchal cord: possible cumulative increased risk of adverse perinatal outcome. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 50 (3): 404-405. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.17389; PMid:27997052
40. Sidorova IS, Makarov IO. (2005). Kliniko-diagnosticheskie aspekty fetoplatsentarnoi nedostatochnosti. Moskva: Med. inform. Agenstvo: 296.
41. Sopko NІ. (2002). Otsenka ul'trazvukovykh kriteriev patologii ekstraembrional'nykh struktur u beremennykh zhenshchin gruppy vysokogo riska. Reproduktivnoe zdorov'e zhenshchiny. 2: 147-151.
42. Stanek J. (2016). Association of coexisting morphological umbilical cord abnormality and clinical cord compromise with hypoxic and thrombotic placental histology. Virchows Archiv. 468 (6): 723-732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-016-1921-1; PMid:26983702
43. Thilaganathan B. (2017). Placental syndromes: getting to the heart of the matter. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 49: 7-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.17378; PMid:28067440
44. Tworetzky W, McElhinney DB. (2009). In Utero Valvuloplasty for Pulmonary Atresia With Hypoplastic Right Ventricle: Techniques and outcomes. Pediatrics. 124: 510-518. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-2014; PMid:19706566 PMCid:PMC4235279
45. Vahanian SA, Lavery JA, Ananth CV et al. (2015). Placental implantation abnormalities and risk of preterm delivery: a systematic review and metaanalysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 213 (4): S78-S90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.058; PMid:26428506
46. Volante E, Gramellini D, Moretti S et al. (2004). Alteration of the amniotic fluid and neonatal outcome. Acta Bio$Medica: Atenei Parmensis. 75 (1): 71-75.
47. WHO. (2021). ICD-11 for Mortality and Morbidity Statistics. URL: https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en#/http%3a%2f%2fid.who.int%2ficd%2fentity%2f714000734.
48. Woodward PG, Kennedy A, Sohaey R et al. (2005). Diagnostic imaging – obstetrics: Altona, Amirsys: 1000.