• Etiological structure of acute gastrointestinal infections in children and analysis of their clinical features depending on etiology
en To content Full text of article

Etiological structure of acute gastrointestinal infections in children and analysis of their clinical features depending on etiology

Modern Pediatrics. Ukraine. 1(113): 22-27. doi 10.15574/SP.2021.113.22
Teslenko M. Yu.
Shupyk National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Kyiv, Ukraine
LLC Medical center «Dobrobut$clinic», Kyiv, Ukraine
Kyiv regional children's hospital No. 1, Ukraine

For citation: Teslenko MYu. (2021). Etiological structure of acute gastrointestinal infections in children and analysis of their clinical features depending on etiology. Modern Pediatrics. Ukraine. 1(113): 2227. doi 10.15574/SP.2021.113.22.
Article received: Nov 24, 2020. Accepted for publication: Feb 07, 2021.

Acute gastroenteritis (AGE) often causes different complications in younger children, which can lead to hospital admission.
Purpose — to explore the etiological structure of infectious gastroenteritis in children under 5 years and severity clinical features of the disease depending on the pathogen.
Materials and methods. 978 children with AGE were enrolled in the study. The age of participants was 0–5 years, they all were patients of infectious diseases department of Kyiv city children's hospital No.1 during 2014–2018 years. The division into groups was based on the detected pathogen. Determination of rotavirus antigen was performed by enzyme$linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), other pathogens were identified by nucleic acid extraction and testing by TAC (TaqMan Array Cards). The clinical features severity according to Vesicari's scale were analyzed during the study.
Results. Among children who were enrolled in the study the most common pathogen was rotavirus, which was present in 47% of all cases. Norovirus took the second place. Campylobacter was the most common among bacterial pathogens. Rotavirus was more common among children of older age group. Shigella and Campylobacter were two the most common pathogens in younger age group. In group non-rotavirus pathogens the most common were mild and moderate course of the disease, but in group with rotavirus mild course wasn't common. None of children with adenoviral or noroviral infection had mild disease. The most part of AGEs caused by bacterial pathogens had severe course.
Conclusions. The leadership of rotavirus infection and an important change in the majority of infections, the introduction of vaccination into the national calendar is highly relevant.
Norovirus took the second place in etiological structure of AGE after rotavirus, and that's why developing vaccine against it is an actual problem. According to severity of disease depending on the pathogen, the biggest value for prophylaxis will have development of vaccines against salmonellosis, norovirus and adenovirus.
The research was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of these Institutes. The informed consent of the patient was obtained for conducting the studies.
No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Key words: causative agents of acute gastroenteritis, rotavirus, noravirus, severity.

REFERENCES

1. Chernyshova LI, Teslenko MIu, Radionova NM, Demchyshyna IV, Kotlik LV, Sadkova OB, Samoilovych OO, Kasian OI, Lavriukova SIa. (2016). Lonhitudynalne sposterezhennia za rotavirusnoiu infektsiieiu u ditei vikom do 5 rokiv, yakykh hospitalizuvaly v dva tsentry Ukrainy v 2006-2015 rokakh. Zdorovia dytyny. 7: 117-123. https://doi.org/10.22141/2224-0551.7.75.2016.86736

2. Dadonaite B, Ritchie H. (2018). Diarrheal diseases. Published online at OurWorldInData.org. URL: https://ourworldindata.org/diarrheal-diseases.

3. Doan SI, Malyn NH. (2015). Hostri kyshkovi infektsii virusnoi etiolohii: epidemiolohichni aspekty. Ukrainskyi medychnyi chasopys. 3 ((107)V/VI): 32-36.

4. Kiseleva V, Faizuloev E, Meskina E, Marova A, Oksanich A et al. (2018). Molecular-Genetic Characterization of Human Rotavirus A Strains Circulating in Moscow, Russia (2009-2014). Virologica Sinica. 33 (4): 304-313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12250-018-0043-0; PMid:30062589 PMCid:PMC6178101

5. Kumthip K, Khamrin P, Ushijima H, Maneekarn N. (2019). Enteric and non-enteric adenoviruses associated with acute gastroenteritis in pediatric patients in Thailand, 2011 to 2017. PloS one. 14 (8): e0220263. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220263; PMid:31369615 PMCid:PMC6675392

6. Li J, Yang Y, Liang ZC, Gao ZY, Jia L, Liu BW, Chen LJ, Wang QY. (2020). Analysis of pathogenic composition and clinical characteristics of viral acute gastroenteritis in children under five years old in Beijing. Chinese journal of preventive medicine. 54 (10): 1104-1110.

7. Liu J, Platts Mills JA, Juma J, Kabir F, Nkeze J et al. (2016). Use of quantitative molecular diagnostic methods to identify causes of diarrhoea in children: a reanalysis of the GEMS case-control study. Lancet (London, England). 388 (10051): 1291-1301.

8. Monica B, Ramani S, Banerjee I, Primrose B, Iturriza Gomara M et al. (2007). Human caliciviruses in symptomatic and asymptomatic infections in children in Vellore, South India. Journal of medical virology. 79 (5): 544-551. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.20862; PMid:17385696 PMCid:PMC2473265

9. Mwenda JM, Ntoto KM, Abebe A, Enweronu Laryea C, Amina I, Mchomvu J et al. (2010). Burden and epidemiology of rotavirus diarrhea in selected African countries: preliminary results from the African Rotavirus Surveillance Network. The Journal of infectious diseases. 202 Suppl.: S5-S11. https://doi.org/10.1086/653557; PMid:20684718

10. Olkhovska OM. (2011). Osoblyvosti klinichnoho perebihu i shliakhy udoskonalennia likuvannia kyshkovykh infektsii u ditei na suchasnomu etapi. Annaly Mechnykovskoho instytutu. 4: 258-261.

11. Parashar UD, Li JF, Cama R, DeZalia M, Monroe SS, Taylor et al. (2004). Human caliciviruses as a cause of severe gastroenteritis in Peruvian children. The Journal of infectious diseases. 190 (6): 1088-1092. https://doi.org/10.1086/423324; PMid:15319858

12. Rouhani S, Penataro Yori P, Paredes Olortegui M, Siguas Salas M, Rengifo Trigoso D, Mondal D et al. (2016). Norovirus Infection and Acquired Immunity in 8 Countries: Results From the MALED Study. Clinical infectious diseases: an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 62 (10): 1210-1217. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciw072; PMid:27013692 PMCid:PMC4845786

13. Ruiz Palacios GM, Perez Schael I, Velazquez FR, Abate H, Breuer T, Clemens SC et al. (2006). Safety and efficacy of an attenuated vaccine against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis. The New England journal of medicine. 354 (1): 11-22.

14. Ruuska T, Vesikari T. (1990). Rotavirus disease in Finnish children: use of numerical scores for clinical severity of diarrheal episodes. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases. 3 (22): 259-267. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365549009027046; PMid:2371542

15. Shaheen M. (2018). Burden of Adenovirus, Astrovirus, Norovirus and Rotavirus Gastroenteritis in Egyptian Children during 2000-2017. Journal of Medical Microbiology & Diagnosis. 7: 3. https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0703.1000283

16. Vesikari T, Matson DO, Dennehy P, Van Damme P, Santosham et al. (2006). Safety and efficacy of a pentavalent human-bovine (WC3) reassortant rotavirus vaccine. The New England journal of medicine. 354 (1): 23-33. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa052664; PMid:16394299

17. WHO. (2017). Diareia. WHO.

18. Zublenko OV. (2015). Spalakhy hostrykh kyshkovykh infektsii v Ukraini. Problemy viiskovoi okhorony zdorovia: zbirnyk naukovykh prats. 44 (2): 139-143.