• Clinical and epidemiological analysis of maternal factors of propensity to neonatal sepsis under conditions of different environmental impact
en To content Full text of article

Clinical and epidemiological analysis of maternal factors of propensity to neonatal sepsis under conditions of different environmental impact

Modern pediatrics. Ukraine. 2019.4(100):33-37; doi 10.15574/SP.2019.100.33

Vlasova O. V., Bezrukov L. O., Koloskova О. К.
HSEЕ «Bukovinian State Medical University», Chernivtsi, Ukraine

For citation: Vlasova OV, Bezrukov LO, Koloskova ОК. (2019). Clinical and epidemiological analysis of maternal factors of propensity to neonatal sepsis under conditions of different environmental impact. Modern pediatrics. Ukraine. 4(100): 33-37. doi 10.15574/SP.2019.100.33
Article received: Dec 29, 2018. Accepted for publication: Apr 18, 2019.

Full text of article

Content

Objective. To improve the results of diagnosis and treatment of neonatal sepsis, to study the peculiarities of maternal predisposition factors to its development in contrast to the ecological characteristics of the regions of residence of pregnant women.

Materials and methods. Clinical and epidemiological analysis of the influence of maternal predisposition factors on the formation of neonatal sepsis in 260 newborns, has been conducted, which depends on the environmental characteristics of the places of residence of pregnant women.

Results. It has been shown that in case of the absence of significant differences in the indicators of reproductive health, as well as somatic pathology and obstetric and gynecological history, the dwelling of pregnant women in unfavorable conditions is accompanied by the increased risk of miscarriage and the birth of children in the gestation period to 35 weeks (HS=2.04; 95% CI 1.2–3.7), the birth of children with extremely low body weight (HS=2.9; 95% CI 1.1–7.3), as well as probably lower Apgar score on the 5th minute of a newborn's life (HS=5.12, 95% D 2,1–12,6).

Conclusions. The change can be regarded as a consequence of chronic contact of pregnant women with the pollution areas of their residence.

The research was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee (LEC) of institution. The informed consent of the patient was obtained for conducting the studies.

No conflict of interest was declared by the authors

Key words: neonatal sepsis, risk factors, maternal predisposition factors, pollution areas.

REFERENCES

1. Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy. Holovne upravlinnia statystyky u Chernivetskii oblasti. Statystychnyi shchorichnyk Chernivetskoi oblasti za 2017 rik: 543.

2. Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy. Holovne upravlinnia statystyky u

Khmelnytskii oblasti. Statystychnyi shchorichnyk Khmelnytskoi oblasti

za 2017 rik: 514.

3. Altunhan H, Annagur A, Ors R et al. (2011). Procalcitonin measurement at 24 hours of age may be helpful in the prompt diagnosis of early-on-set neonatal sepsis. Int J Infect Dis.15(12): e854–858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2011.09.007; PMid:22019570

4. Auriti C, Fiscarelli E, Ronchetti MP et al. (2012). Procalcitonin in detecting neonatal nosocomial sepsis. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal. Neonatal. Ed. 97(5): F368–370. https://doi.org/10.1136/fetalneonatal-2010-194100; PMid:22933097

5. Barouki R, Melen E, Herceg Z, Beckers J et al. (2018). Epigenetics as a mechanism linking developmental exposures to long-term toxicity. Environment international. 114: 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.02.014; PMid:29499450 PMCid:PMC5899930

6. Bollati V, Baccarelli A. (2010). Environmental epigenetics. Heredity. 105(1): 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2010.2; PMid:20179736 PMCid:PMC3133724

7. Chiesa CL, Natale F, Pascone R et al. (2011). C4reactive protein and procalcitonin: reference intervals for preterm and term newborns during the early neonatal period. Clin Chim Acta. 412 (11–12): 1053–1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2011.02.020; PMid:21338596

8. Dritsakou K, Liosis G, Gioni M et al. (2015). CRP levels in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) septic infants. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med.28(2): 237–239. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2014.908842; PMid:24670235

9. Ezziane Z. (2013). The impact of air pollution on low birth weight and infant mortality. Reviews on Environmental Health. 28(2–3): 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2013-0007; PMid:24192497

10. Fleischmann4Struzek C, Goldfarb DM, Schlattmann P, Schlapbach LJ, Reinhart K, Kissoon N. (2018). The global burden of paediatric and neonatal sepsis: a systematic review. Lancet Respir Med.6(3): 223–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30063-8

11. Genowska A, Jamiolkowski J, Szafraniec K, Stepaniak U, Szpak A, Pajak A. (2015). Environmental and socio4economic determinants of infant mortality in Poland: an ecological study. Environmental health. 14:61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-015-0048-1; PMid:26195213 PMCid:PMC4508882

12. Getabelew A, Aman M, Fantaye E, Yeheyis T. (2018). Prevalence of Neonatal Sepsis and Associated Factors among Neonates in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at Selected Governmental Hospitals in Shashemene Town, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia, 2017. Int J Pediatr. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7801272; PMid:30174698 PMCid:PMC6098917

13. Hornik CP, Fort P, Clark RH, Watt K et al. (2012). Early and late onset sepsis in very-low-birth-weight infants from a large group of neonatal intensive care units. Early Hum. Dev. 88 (2): 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3782(12)70019-1

14. Kamalakannan SK. (2018). Neonatal Sepsis Past to Present. Biomed J Sci & Tech Res. 3(3): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.26717/BJSTR.2018.03.000909

15. Kihal-Talantikite W, Zmirou-Navier D, Padilla C, Deguen S. (2017, May). Systematic literature review of reproductive outcome associated with residential proximity to polluted sites. International journal of health geographics.16: 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12942-017-0091-y; PMid:28558782 PMCid:PMC5450119-y

16. Pammi ML, Weisman LE. (2015). Late4onset sepsis in preterm infants: update on strategies for therapy and prevention. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 13 (4): 487–504.

17. Shane AL, Stoll BJ. (2014). Neonatal sepsis: Progress towards improved outcomes. J Infect. 68;1: 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2013.09.011; PMid:24140138

18. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW et al. (2016). The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis43). JAMA.315(8):801—10. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0287; PMid:26903338 PMCid:PMC4968574.

19. Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Bell EF et al. (2015). Trends in Care Practices, Morbidity, and Mortality of Extremely Preterm. Neonates, 1993—2012. JAMA. 314 (10): 1039. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.10244; PMid:26348753 PMCid:PMC4787615