HEALTH OF WOMAN. 2019.1(137):125–127; doi 10.15574/HW.2019.137.125

Berestovy O. О.
Shupyk National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Kiev

The objective: studying clinical-psychopathologic patterns of formation of alarming disorders at women at auxiliary genesial technologies.

Materials and methods. We surveyed 156 women suffering from sterility addressed in unit of auxiliary technologies for treatment of sterility. It was taped that 81 women suffered boundary alienations. The control group was made by 52 fertilny mentally healthy women. To all patients full clinical-laboratory examination according to the scheme accepted in reproductology was conducted.

Results. Women with the secondary sterility, using auxiliary genesial technologies makes group of high risk on developments of various psychological disturbances, especially alarming disorders. Dynamics of alarming disorders depends on psychosocial factors or existence of the gynecologic disease which has been the reason of sterility.

Conclusion. The received results needs to be considered when developing algorithm of diagnostic and treatment-and-prophylactic actions.

Key words: sterility, auxiliary genesial technologies, alarming disorders.

REFERENCES

1. Suslikova LV. (2017). Suchasni dopomizhni reproduktyvni tekhnolohii v Ukraini. Mystetstvo likuvannia. Zhurnal suchasnoho likaria 4:13–15.

2. Aleksandrovskiy YuA. (2016). Pogranichnyie psihicheskie rasstroystva: Uchebnoe posobie. M, Meditsina:496.

3. Deyneka NV, Melchenko NI. (2015). Psihosomaticheskie sootnosheniya pri besplodii u zhenschin. Psihosomaticheskie rasstroystva v akusherstve, ginekologii i pediatrii. Ivanovo:147–150.

4. Krutova VA, Ermoshenko BG. (2015). Rol psihologicheskih faktorov pri besplodii (Obzor literaturyi). Uspehi sovremennogo estestvoznaniya 8:17–21.

5. Baram D, Tourtelot E. (2016). Psychological adjustment following unsuccessful in vitro fertilization. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 8:181.

6. Callan VJ, Hennessey JF. (2016). The psychological adjustment of women experiencing infertility. British Journal of Medical Psychology 61:137–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.1988.tb02772.x; PMid:3401421

7. Kainz K. (2017). The role of the psychologist in the evaluation and treatment of infertility. Womens Health 11: 481–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1049-3867(01)00129-3