HEALTH OF WOMAN. 2017.2(118):66–68; doi 10.15574/HW.2017.118.66

Boyko V. I., Tkachenko S. A.
Medical Institute of Sumy state University of Ministry of education of Ukraine

The objective: depression of frequency of perinatal pathology at women with decompensation form of placental dysfunction by improvement of the main diagnostic and treatment-and-prophylactic actions.

Patients and methods. 154 pregnant women in gestation term from 22 to 40 weeks were surveyed. Depending on features of course of pregnancy and families of all surveyed it was divided into 4 groups. The group of the retrospective analysis was made by 45 pregnant women with decompensation placental dysfuction, the group of prospective research included 109 pregnant women of whom the main group was made by 38 women with decompensation form of placental dysfunction, the group of comparison included 47 pregnant women with the compensated form of placental dysfunction. The control group was made by 24 pregnant women with the uncomplicated course of pregnancy and labors. The complex of the conducted researches included clinical, ehografical, dopplerometrical, laboratory, morphological and statistical methods.

Results. Use of advanced algorithm of diagnostic and treatment-and-prophylactic actions allows to increase efficiency of diagnostics of decompensation form of placental dysfunction for 33.3%, and rational tactics of a delivery leads to depression of perinatal pathology for 22.7%.

Conclusion. Decompensation placental dysfuction is one of the main reasons for perinatal mortality and a case rate at the present stage. Use of the algorithm of diagnostic and treatment-and-prophylactic actions improved by us allows major factors of risk of this complication and the indication for change of tactics and delivery times.

Key words: decompensation placental dysfunction, diagnostics, delivery tactics.

REFERENCES

1. Obstetrics: the textbook / under the editorship of V. E. Radzinsky. 2016. M, GEOTAR-Media:913.

2. Ivanova EA. 2014. Features of  course of pregnancy, labors and outcomes at  placental failure. Genesial medicine: new tendencies and not resolved questions: materials of the All-Russian scientific Internet international conference. Кazan:19-23.

3. Kamilova NM. 2015. Possibilities of forecasting of perinatal outcomes by functional assessment of fetoplacental system. Ultrasonic and functional diagnostic 5:39-43.

4. Melnik YuN. 2015. Value of a sonografical assessment of  blood flow in venous duct in diagnostics of placental dysfunction and forecasting of current of labors. Health of woman 7:54-57.

5. Alberry M, Soothill P. 2007. Management of fetal growth restriction. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal. Neonatal. 92;1:62–67. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2005.082297; PMid:17185432 PMCid:PMC2675309

6. Baschat AA. 2014. Fetal responses to placental insufficiency: an update. BJOG. 111;10:1031–1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00273.x; PMid:15383103

7. Chisholm KM, Heerema-McKenney A, Tian L et al. 2016. Correlation of preterm infant illness severity with placental histology. Placenta. 39:61–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2016.01.012; PMid:26992676 PMCid:PMC4819396

8. Komacki J. 2015. The use of Doppler in the second half of pregnancy. Ginekol. Pol. 86;8:626–630. https://doi.org/10.17772/gp/57867; PMid:26492713