- Женское бесплодие трубного происхождения (Обзор литературы)
Женское бесплодие трубного происхождения (Обзор литературы)
HEALTH OF WOMAN. 2017.2(118):126–131
Юзько А. М.
ВГУЗ «Буковинский государственный медицинский университет», КУОЗ «Медицинский центр лечения бесплодия», Украинская ассоциация репродуктивной медицины, г. Черновцы
В статье изложены современные рекомендации по выбору метода диагностики и лечения женского бесплодия трубного происхождения.
Ключевые слова: женское бесплодие трубного происхождения, диагностика, хирургическое лечение, экстракорпоральное оплодотворение.
Литература:
1. Гинекология: учебник / под ред. В.Е. Радзинского, А.М. Фукса. – М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2014. – 1000 с.
2. Клиническая практика в репродуктивной медицине: руководство для врачей / под ред. В.Н. Локшина, Т.М. Джусубалиевой. – Алматы: MedMedia Казахстан, 2015. – 464 с.
3. Ahmad G., Watson A.J., Metwally M. Laparoscopy or laparotomy for distal tubal surgery? A meta-analysis // Hum. Fertil (Camb). – 2007. – Vol. 10, No 1. – P. 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647270600977820; PMid:17454208
4. Ahmad G., Watson A., Vandekerckhove P., Lilford R. Techniques for pelvic surgery in subfertility [Electronic resource] // Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19; (2): CD000221; www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/pubmed/16625531 (last access: 22.12.16). – Title from the screen.
5. Akande V.A., Cahill D.J., Wardle P.G., Rutherford A.J. and Jenkins J.M. The predictive value of the «Hull & Rutherford» classification for tubal damage // BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. – November 2004. – Vol. 111, No 11. – P. 1236–1241.
6. Conway S. Tubal Reversal versus IVF: Which is the best choice? [Electronic resource] // The Conception Connection. The Official Publication of Georgia Reproductive Specialists. – January, 2010. – Р. 6–7; www. ivf. com/ downloads/CC_1201.pdf (last access: 26.12.16). – Title from the screen.
7. Das S., Nardo L.G., Seif M.W. Proximal tubal disease: the place for tubal cannulation [Electronic resource] // Reprod Biomed Online. – 2007. – Vol. 15, No 4. – Р. 383–388; www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17908398 (last access: 29.11.16). – Title from the screen.
8. Dun Е.C., Nezhat C.H. Tubal Factor Infertility Diagnosis and Management in the Era of Assisted Reproductive Technology [Electronic resource] // Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. N. Am. – 2012. – Vol. 39. – P. 551–566; blog. utp. edu.co/maternoinfantil/files/2012/04/Tubal-Factor-Infertility.pdf (last access: 29.11.16). – Title from the screen.
9. International Federation of Fertility Societies Global Standards of Infertility Care. Standard 7. Assessment of tubal patency. Recommendations for Practice [Electronic resource] // c. ymcdn. com/ sites/ www.iffs-reproduction. org/ resource/resmgr/Policy_Statements/Standard_7tubal_patency_asse.pdf (last access: 05.12.16). – Title from the screen.
10. International Federation of Fertility Societies Global Standards of Infertility Care. Standard 9. Tubal Surgery. Recommendations for Practice [Electronic resource] // c. ymcdn. com/ sites/ www.iffs-reproduction. org/ resource/resmgr/Policy_Statements/Standard_9_TubalsurgeryJuly_.pdf (last access: 05.12.16). – Title from the screen.
11. Jennifer Hirshfeld-Cytron, Jordan Winter. Laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis versus in vitro fertilization: cost-based decision analysis [Electronic resource] // American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. – 2013. – Volume 209, Issue 1. – P. 56-56; (last access: 19.12.16). – Title from the screen. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.04.018
12. Johnson N.1., van Voorst S., Sowter M.C., Strandell A., Mol B.W. Surgical treatment for tubal disease in women due to undergo in vitro fertilisation [Electronic resource] // Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20; (1):CD002125. doi: 10. 1002/ 14651858. CD 002125. pub3; www. ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20091531 (last access: 22.12.16). – Title from the screen.
13. Nardo L.G. Proximal tubal disease – tubal surgery or IVF [Electronic resource] // www. google. com.ua/ url? sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwinjPO33M3QAhVlJ5oKHRh1DJkQFggbMAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.eshre.eu%2F~%2Fmedia%2Fsitecore-files% 2FSIGs % 2 FSurgery % 2FGrado-2011 % 2FNardo. pdf % 3Fla% 3Den&usg = AFQ jCNE gyp8-XGv X8G Zvp H0JO wz DZoT DSA&sig2=g5cdMCTgGnaDGrOekTEp2g (last access: 29.11.16). – Title from the screen.
14. Nardo L.G., Tin-Chiu Li. Introduction [Electronic resource] // Reproductive BioMedicine Online. – 2007. – Vol. 15, No 4. – P. 367–368; www.rbmojournal.com/article/S1472-6483(10)60359-8/pdf (last access: 29.11.16). – Title from the screen. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60359-8
15. Rutherford A.J., Jenkins J.M. Hull and Rutherford classification of infertility // Human Fertility (Camb). – 2002. – Nо 5 (1 Suppl). – S41–45.
16. Shi-En Zou, Yi Jin, Yi-Ling Ko, Jin Zhu. A new classification system for pregnancy prognosis of tubal factor infertility [Electronic resource] // Int J Clin Exp Med. – 2014. – Nо 7 (5). – Р. 1410–1416; www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/ pmc/articles/PMC4073765/ (last access: 19.12.16). – Title from the screen.
17. Tsiami A., Chaimani A., Mavridis D., Siskou M., Assimakopoulos E., Sotiriadis A. Surgical treatment for hydrosalpinx prior to in-vitro fertilization embryo transfer: a network meta-analysis [Electronic resource] // Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. – 2016. – Volume 48, Issue 4. – P. 434–445; onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/uog.15900/abstract (last access: 22.12.16). – Title from the screen.
18. Zhang Y., Sun Y., Guo Y., Li TC., Duan H. Salpingectomy and proximal tubal occlusion for hydrosalpinx prior to in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [Electronic resource] // Obstet Gynecol Surv. – 2015. – No 70(1). – P. 33–38; www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25616345 (last access: 22.12.16). – Title from the screen.