• The differential approach in the treatment of chronic constipation in children with congenital intestinal development 
en To content Full text of article

The differential approach in the treatment of chronic constipation in children with congenital intestinal development 

SOVREMENNAYA PEDIATRIYA.2016.8(80):103-110; doi 10.15574/SP.2016.80.103 

The differential approach in the treatment of chronic constipation in children with congenital intestinal development 

Berezhnoi V. V., Kozachuk V. G., Ribalchenko V. F.

Shupik National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Kiev, Ukraine

Objective. To examine clinical efficacy of the «Medulak» preparation in the complex treatment of chronic constipation in children occurred due to the congen!

ital colon abnormality.

Patients and methods. A clinical study included 30 children with chronic constipation occurred due to the congenital colon abnormality. The average age of

the patients was 7,5 ± 2,1 years. The diagnosis was verified according to the basis of medical history, patient complaints, clinical examination, digital exam!

ination of the rectum, laboratory methods, ultrasound scan of the abdominal cavity and ergography. In addition to the complex therapy patients had received

«Medulak» preparation. Monitoring of the effectiveness of the therapy was carried out on the 15th and 30th day of treatment.

Results. According to the results of ergography the signs of dolichocolon were detected in 10 (33.3%) patients, megadolichocolon — in 6 (20%), megacolon —

in 3 (10%), dolichocolon + Payra syndrome — in 3 (10%), megacolon + Payra syndrome — in 2 (6.6%), dolichocolon + megarectum — in 2 (6.6%),

megadolichosigmoids — in one child. Before the treatment in children, along with gastrointestinal disorders were observed dermatointerstitial and vegetative

manifestations. During the follow!up in most children was found a violation of the intestinal microbiota. According to the results of coprological research in

26 (86.7%) children was determined insufficient digestion of proteins, fats and carbohydrates. During the treatment by Medulak the positive clinical dynam!

ics was observed in all patients. On the 15th day of the treatment in half of the patients were absent any clinical symptoms of constipation. The positive clin!

ical effect was found in most of children (93.3%).

Conclusions. The use of «Medulak» in the complex therapy of chronic constipation in children with congenital colon abnormality resulted to the good thera!

peutic efficacy. Preparation improves the character of discharge, helps to stimulate bowel motility, normalizes its microbiocenosis and prevents complica!

tions, that allows to recommend it in the practice of pediatricians, general practitioners — family doctors and pediatric surgeons.

Key words: children, constipation, congenital colon Medulak.


1. Butorova LI, Kalinin AV. 2008. Vozmozhnosti korrektsii narusheniya kishechnogo mikrobiotsenoza laktulozoy. Ros zhurn gastroenterol, gepatol, koloproktol. 1: 79—83.

2. Dubrovskaya MI, Shumilov PV, Muhina YuG. 2008. Zaporyi u detey: sovremennyie podhodyi i taktika lecheniya. Lechaschiy vrach. http://www.lvrach.ru/2008/07/5537545/phtml.

3. Kamalova AA, Shakirova AR. 2016.Funktsionalnyie zaporyi u detey rannego vozrasta: diagnostika i terapiya na praktike. Rossiyskiy vestn. perinatol. i pediatrii. 4: 108—1013.

4. Plotnikova EYu. 2015. Sovremennyie predstavleniya o zapore. Lechaschiy vrach. 8.http://www.lvrach.ru/2015/08/15436271/.

5. Rybalchenko VV. 2015. Syndrom zakrepiv u ditei. Navchalnyi posibnyk. Za red VV Berezhnoho, PS Rusaka, Hrony. Kyiv, TOV «VIT-A-POL»: 234.

6. Voderholzer WA, Schatke W, Muhldorfer BE et al. 1997. Clinical response to dietary fiber treatment of chronic constipation. Am J Gastroenterol. 92: 95—98. PMid:8995945

7. Camilleri M et al. 2010. Clinical trial: the efficacy of open-label prucalopride treatment in patients with chronic constipation — follow-up of patients from the pivotal studies. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 32(9): 1113—1123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04455.x; PMid:21039673

8. Degen LP, Phillips SF. 1996. How well does stool form reflect colonic transit? Gut. 39: 109—113. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.39.1.109; PMid:8881820 PMCid:PMC1383242

9. Di Palma JA, Smith JR, Cleveland MV. 2002. Overnight efficacy of polyethylene glycol laxative. Am J Gastroenterol. 97: 1776—1779. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05840.x; PMid:12135034

10. Saad RJ, Rao SSC, Koch KL et al. 2010. Do stool form and frequency correlate with whole-gut and colonic transit? Results from a multicenter study in constipated individuals and healthy controls. Am J Gastroenterol. 105: 403—411. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2009.612; PMid:19888202

11. Tabbers MM, Di Lorenzo C, Berger MY et al. 2014. Evaluation and treatment of functional constipation in infants and children: evidence-based recommendations from ESPGHAN and NASPGHAN. Journal of pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. 58: 258—274. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000000266; PMid:24345831

12. Kist M. 1980. Salmonellen-Enteritis. Lactulose beschienigt die Pathogene-Elimination. Selecta. 46: 4050—4051.

13. McKay SL, Fravel M, Scanlon C. 2009. Management of constipation. Iowa City (IA), University of Iowa Gerontological Nursing Interventions Research Center, Research Translation and Dissemination Core: 51.

14. Terment CA, Bastawrous AL, Morin NA et al. 2007.Practice parameters for the evaluation and management of constipation. Dis Colon Rectum. 50: 2013—2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-9000-y; PMid:17665250

15. Ramcumar DP, Rao SSC. 2001. Functional anorectal disorders. Evidence-Based Gastroenterology. Irvine EJ, Hunt RH (eds). London, BC Decker: 207—222.

16. Singh S, Rao SSC. 2010. Pharmacologic Management of Chronic Constipation. Gastroenterol Clin N Am. 39: 509—527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gtc.2010.08.001; PMid:20951915

17. Brandt LJ, Prather CM, Quigley EM et al. 2005. Systemic review of the management of chronic constipation in North America. Amer J Gastroenterol. 100: 5—22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.50613_2.x; PMid:16008641

18. Thompson WG, Longstreth GF, Drossman DA et al. 1999. Gut. Suppl II: 1143—1147.

19. University of Michigan Medical Center. Idiopathic constipation and soiling in children. 1997. Ann Arbor (MI): University of Michigan Health System: 5.

20. Van den Berg MM, Benninga MA, Di Lorenzo C. 2006. Epidemiology of childhood constipation: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 101(10): 2401—2409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00771.x; PMid:17032205

21. World Gastroenterology Organisation Global Guidelines. Constipation: a global perspective. November 2010. URL: http://www.worldgastroenterology.org/constipation.html.