• The results of a comparative study of the optical field of a lens and fiber-optic fetoscopes

The results of a comparative study of the optical field of a lens and fiber-optic fetoscopes

HEALTH OF WOMAN. 2018.3(129):51–53; doi 10.15574/HW.2018.129.51

Oshovskiy V. I.
Medical Center LLC «Uniclinika»
Shupyk National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Kiev

The objective: comparison of some characteristics of visualization of the operating field with the use of fiber-fiber and lens fetoscopes.
Materials and methods. A comparison was made between the characteristics of a classic lens fetoscope with a diameter of 2.0 mm, a lens fetoscope with a diameter of 2.0 mm, and flexible fiber optics 1.0 mm in diameter.
Results. It was revealed that the use of ultrathin optics allows to significantly reduce the size of the holes in the amniotic membranes without reducing the visualization area, however with a noticeable loss of image quality.
Conclusion. The use of ultrathin fetoscopes is a promising direction in fetal medicine, because despite the relatively poor image quality, the area of visualization of the operating field is identical. Correct juxtaposition of the surfaces of the fetoscope and trocars, as well as the adjustment of the intensity of the light beam, can prevent negative optical effects.
Key words: fetoscope, amniotic membranes, invasive procedures.

REFERENCES

1. Athanasiadis AP, Pantazis K, Goulis DG, Chatzigeorgiou K, Vaitsi V, Assimakopoulos E et al. 2009. Comparison between 20G and 22G needle for second trimester amniocentesis in terms of technical aspects and short-term complications. Prenat Diagn 29:761–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.2283; PMid:19412914

2. Tchirikov M, Oshovskyy V, Steetskamp J, Falkert A, Huber G, Entezami M. 2011, Nov. Neonatal outcome using ultrathin fetoscope for laser coagulation in twin-to-twin-transfusion syndrome. J Perinat Med. 39(6):725–30. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm.2011.091; PMid:21867454

3. Ruano R, Brizot Mde L, Liao AW, Zugaib M. 2009. Selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation of superficial placental anastomoses for the treatment of severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Clinics 64:91–6. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322009000200005; PMid:19219313 PMCid:PMC2666485

4. Devlieger R, Millar LK, Bryant-Greenwood G, Lewi, Deprest JA. 2006. Fetal membrane healing after spontaneous and iatrogenic membrane rupture: A review of current evidence. Am J Obstet Gynec 195:1512–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2006.01.074; PMid:16681986 PMCid:PMC1665653

5. Papadopulos N, Klotz S, Raith A et al. 2006. Amnion cells engineering: a new perspective in fetal membrane healing after intrauterine surgery? Fetal Diagn Ther 21:494–500. https://doi.org/10.1159/000095660; PMid:16969002

6. Moore RM, Mansour JM, Redline RW, Mercer BM, Moore JJ. 2006. The physiology of fetal membrane rupture: insight gained from the determination of physical properties. Placenta 27:1037–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2006.01.002; PMid:16516962

7. Toda A, Okabe M, Yoshida T, Nikaido T. 2007. The potential of amniotic membrane/amnion-derived cells for regeneration of various tissues. J Pharmacol Sci 105:215–28. https://doi.org/10.1254/jphs.CR0070034; PMid:17986813