• Morphofunctional conditions of the endometrium in the late reproductive age patients with infertility 
To content

Morphofunctional conditions of the endometrium in the late reproductive age patients with infertility 

HEALTH OF WOMAN. 2015.6(102):128–130; doi 10.15574/HW.2015.102.128 

Morphofunctional conditions of the endometrium in the late reproductive age patients with infertility 

Kornienko S. M.

State Institute of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology 

The purpose of this study was to examine the morphofunctional state of endometrium in women of late reproductive age with infertility before IVF. The study involved 197 patients with infertility. Were performed ultrasound, fluid hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy to examine the state of its receptor system. Were found that the US is not sufficiently informative for diagnostics of endometrial pathology in this category of patients: diagnostic findings during hysteroscopy included: endometrial polyp – 6.1%, endometrial hyperplasia – 4.0%, saddle uterus – 2.5%, uterine adhesions – 0.5% of cases. In general, primary false negative diagnoses recorded in 18.7% of patients. Immunohistochemical study of the expression of receptors for estrogen and progesterone in the endometrium revealed a dissonance between the indices in the stroma and glands: if the level of estrogen receptors in the glands and stroma in the majority of patients was higher than the population norm (in 84 and 66% cases, respectively), the number of progesterone receptors in stroma was reduced in 46% of women, and in the glands – increased in 59%. 

Key words: infertility, hysteroscopy, endometrial pathology, assisted reproductive technologies. 


1. Liu K, Case A. 2011. Advanced reproductive age and fertility. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 33(11):1165–1175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(16)35087-3

2. Kimberly L, Case A, Cheung AP, Sierra S, AlAsiri S et al. 2012. Advanced reproductive age and fertility. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 117(1):95–102.

3. Johnson JA, Tough S. 2012. Delayed child-bearing. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 34(1):80–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(16)35138-6

4. Broekmans FJ, Knauff EAH, te Velde ER, Macklon NS, Fauser BC. 2008. Female reproductive ageing: current knowledge and future trends. Trends in Endocrinol Metabol. 18:58–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2007.01.004; PMid:17275321

5. Implantation failure: molecular mechanisms and clinical treatment Hum Reprod Update. 17(2):242–253. 2011.

6. The human endometrium as a fertility-determining factor. Human Reproduction Update. 12;5:617–630.

7. Dallenbach-Hellweg G. 1984. The endometrium of infertility. A review. Pathol Res Pract. 178(6):527–37.

8. Mandate of the Mіnіstry Health of Ukraine № 787 od 09.09.2013. Procedure of implementation of the supportive reproductive technologyіy in Ukraine.

9. Mishieva NG, Gatineau TA, Abubakirov AN, Surmava HR, Eapen SM. 2006. Reproductive health of aging women. Doctor 9:23–28.

10. Lysenko O, Ashhab MK, Strizhova NV еt al. 2004. Immunohistochemical study of the expression of steroid hormone receptors in the endometrial hyperplastic processes. Archives of Pathology 66;2:7–10.

11. Lokshin VN, Aldangarova GA. 2002. The structure of womb pathology in women with infertility of various origins. Modern approaches to the treatment of infertility: Sat. scientific. works. Ekaterinburg:106–107.

12. Samoilov AV, Kostrova EV, Lyubovtseva LA. 2008, September 4–6. The receptor status of endometrium in women with infertility. Reproductive Technology Today and Tomorrow: materials XVIII Annual International Conference RAHR, Samara. 2008:52–53.