• Managing biotopes of women – new approaches
en To content

Managing biotopes of women – new approaches

HEALTH OF WOMAN. 2018.5(132):34–36; doi 10.15574/HW.2018.132.34

Zhuk S. I. , Shluakhtina A. A.
Shupyk National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Kiev

The objective: the study of the microbiocenosis of the vagina and intestines in pregnant women.

Materials and methods. The study included 154 pregnant women. Evaluation of the state of microcenosis of the birth canal in pregnant women was performed in the period of 38 weeks.

Results.A microscopic and bacteriological study of fecal and vaginal microflora was performed to assess the degree of disturbance of vaginal and intestinal microbiocenosis in 154 pregnant women at a gestational age of 38 weeks. As a result of microbiological and bacteriological screening, it was found that the majority of the examined pregnant women had various dysbiotic disorders.

Conclusion. Consequently, given the presence of a reliable connection between the complicated pregnancy and dysbiotic disorders in the vagina and intestine, it is necessary to more standardize microbiological and bacteriological examination of the vaginal and intestinal microflora. This will enable the timely and correct appointment of both treatment and preventive measures that will help prevent possible complications and thereby reduce perinatal morbidity and mortality.

Key words: pregnancy, microbiocenosis, dysbacteriosis of the vagina, intestines, bacterial vaginosis.


1. Zhuk SI, Us IV, Shlyahtina AA. 2016. Peroralnyie probiotiki – zalog uspeshnoy beremennosti. Zdorove zhenschiny 10(116):55–56.

2. Kovachev S. 2018. Defence factors of vaginal lactobacilli. Critical Reviews in Microbiology 44(1):31–39.

3. Strizhakov AN, Budanov PV. 2007. Sostoyanie mikrotsenoza vlagalischa i sposobyi korrektsii ego narusheniy vo vremya beremennosti. Voprosyi ginekologii, akusherstva i perinatologii 6;5.

4. Larsson PG et al. 2000. Treatment with 2% clindamycin vaginal cream prior to first trimester surgical abortion to reduce signs of postoperative infection: a prospective, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 79:390–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/j.1600-0412.2000.079005390.x; https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0412.2000.079005390.x; PMid:10830767

5. Donders GG et al. 2000. Relationship of bacterial vaginosis and mycoplasmas to the risk of spontaneous abortion. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 183:431–437. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2000.105738; PMid:10942482

6. Hay PE, Lamont RF, Taylor-robinson D, Morgan DJ & Ison C. 1994. Abnormal bacterial colonisation of the genital tract and subsequent preterm delivery and late miscarriage. Br. Med. J. 308:295–298. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.308.6924.295

7. Gibbs RS. 1993. Chorioamnionitis and bacterial vaginosis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 169:460–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(93)90341-F

8. Jacobsson B, Pernevi P, Chidekel L & Platz-Christensen J-J. 2002. Bacterial vaginosis in early pregnancy may predispose for preterm birth and postpartum endometritis. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 81:1006–1010. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0412.2002.811103.x; PMid:12421167

9. Parry S & Strauss JF. 1998. Premature rupture of the fetal membranes. N. Engl. J. Med. 338:663–670. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199803053381006; PMid:9486996

10. Leitich H et al. 2003. Bacterial vaginosis as a risk factor for preterm delivery: A meta-analysis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 189:139–147. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2003.339; PMid:12861153

11. Aline C Freitas, Bonnie Chaban, Alan Bocking et al. 2017. The vaginal microbiome of pregnant women is less rich and diverse, with lower prevalence of Mollicutes, compared to non-pregnant women. Scientific Reportsv 7;9212. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07790-9; PMid:28835692 PMCid:PMC5569030

12. Seythanova BT, Shapambaev NZ, Olzhaeva RR, Kalmenova PE. 2014. Mikrobiotsenoz vlagalischa i beremennyih zhenschin. Nauka i zdravoohranenie 1:70–71.

13. Budanov PV, Strizhakov AN. 2004. Metodyi profilaktiki, lecheniya i podgotovki zhenschin s narusheniyami mikrotsenoza vlagalischa k rodorazresheniyu i ginekologicheskim operatsiyam. Voprosyi ginekologii, akusherstva i perinatologii 3;2:39–42.

14. Radzinskiy VE, Hamoshina MB, Soloveva AV. 2011. Sanatsiya pered rodami i ginekologicheskimi operatsiyami: nuzhna? Ne nuzhna? Vredna? Diagnostika i korrektsiya narusheniy vlagalischa biotsenoza v programmah podgotovki k rodorazresheniyu i ginekologicheskim operatsiyam. Klinicheskaya lektsiya. M, Mediabyuro StatusPraesens:9–11.