• The importance of diagnosis of TORCH-infections before using assisted reproductive technologies programs

The importance of diagnosis of TORCH-infections before using assisted reproductive technologies programs

HEALTH OF WOMAN. 2018.5(131):20–22; doi 10.15574/HW.2018.131.20

Kaminskyy V. V. , Shalko M. N. , Malysheva I. V. , Chayka V. V. , Sorokina O. O.
USIR of Shupyk National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Kyiv
Kyiv City Center for Reproductive and Perinatal Medicine
Ukrainian State Institute of Reproduction, Kyiv

The necessity of examining the Ukrainians of reproductive age on TORCH infection by using TORCH-IgG-test-MBA and TORCH-IgM-test-MBA test-kits has been analysed in this article. The study has been conducted to introduce an examination algorithm, which is supposed to increase the frequency of achieving positive results after using ART and reduce the frequency of perinatal and obstetric complications, as well as provide a quick and cost-effective method of infections diagnosis.

Key words: infertility, assisted reproductive technologies, TORCH infections, test-kits.

REFERENCES

1. Bidovanets OIu. 2014. Osoblyvosti perebihu TORCH-infektsii u zhinok reproduktyvnoho viku: 90–92.

2. Vdovichenko YuP, Chermak II. 2011. Nevyinashivanie beremennosti u zhenschin pozdnego reproduktivnogo vozrasta s besplodiem v anamneze. Zdorove zhenschiny 2:250–251.

3. Vovk IB, Kondratiuk VK, Trokhymovych OV. 2012. Zahroza pereryvannia vahitnosti v ranni terminy: pohliady na etiolohiiu, patohenez, diahnostyku ta likuvannia (Ohliad literatury). Zdorove zhenshchynу 5(71):50–51.

4. Govoruha IT. 2010. Vliyanie narusheniy eubioza vlagalischa, urogenitalnyih i TORCH-infektsiy na techenie beremennosti i rodov u patsientok s izlechennyim besplodiem v anamneze. Mediko-sotsіalnі problemу sіm’уi 15;1:3–10.

5. Diagnostika zhenskogo besplodiya. Mnenie prakticheskogo komiteta Amerinskogo obschestva reproduktivnoy meditsinyi (AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, ASRM). Reproduktivnaya endokrinologiya 3:45–51. 2016.

6. Dubina VH, Holovatiuk KP, Zakharchenko IL ta in. 2014. Faktory ryzyku nevynoshuvannia vahitnosti pry likuvanni bezpliddia metodamy dopomizhnykh reproduktyvnykh tekhnolohii. Zdorove zhenshchynу 10:188–192.

7. Kaminskyi VV, Shypko IM. 2013. Profilaktyka akusherskykh ta perynatalnykh uskladnen u vahitnykh na tli henitalnoho herpesu ta tsytomehalovirusnoi infektsii pislia vykorystannia dopomizhnykh reproduktyvnykh tekhnolohii. Zdorove zhenshchynу 1(77):72–73.

8. Kapustin EV, Herevych HI. 2016. Mistse ta rol dopomizhnykh reproduktyvnykh tekhnolohii (DRT) u likuvanni nepliddia ta zberezhenni fertylnosti. Akusherstvo. Hinekolohiia. Henetyka. 2:30–31.

9. Lytvyn NV, Henyk NI. 2017. Otsinka prychyn rannikh vtrat vahitnosti u zhinok iz bezpliddiam, vkliuchenykh u prohramu dopomizhnykh reproduktyvnykh tekhnolohii. Aktualni pytannia pediatrii, akusherstva ta hinekolohii 1:84–89.

10. Sehedii LI. 2014. Suchasnyi stan problemy bezpliddia ta nevynoshuvannia vahitnosti: perspektyvy polipshennia sytuatsii za umov zaplidnennia in vitro. Zdorove zhenshchynу 8:159–163.

11. Sidelnikova VM, Suhih GT. 2010. Nevyinashivanie beremennosti: Rukovodstvo dlya praktikuyuschih vrachey: 536.

12. Kovacs P. 2014, Dec. Fertility preservation in reproductive age women with cancer. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. India. Epub. 64(6):381–7.

13. Pasquini L, Seravalli V. 2016. Prevalence of a positive TORCH and parvovirus B19 screening in pregnancies complicated by polyhydramnios. Prenatal diagnosis. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.4769; PMid:26970557