• Complications of the surgical treatment in children with inguinal hernia with the applying of the open and mini-invasive methods
To content

Complications of the surgical treatment in children with inguinal hernia with the applying of the open and mini-invasive methods

PAEDIATRIC SURGERY.2016.3-4(52-53):34-37; doi 10.15574/PS.2016.52-53.34 

Complications of the surgical treatment in children with inguinal hernia with the applying of the open and mini-invasive methods

Pereyaslov A. A., Dvorakevych A. O.

Danylo Halytsky Lviv national medical university, Ukraine

Lviv regional children’s clinical hospital «OHMATDYT», Ukraine

Introduction. Surgical interventions in children with the inguinal hernia are the most common operations in pediatric surgical clinics. Open surgery during the long time was considered as the gold standard in the treatment of this pathology. The development of mini-invasive surgery determined the applying of these methods in the treatment of children with the inguinal hernia. The aim of the study was to compare the complications, which arisen in children with the inguinal hernia during the open and mini-invasive treatment.

Material and methods. The study based on the results of the surgery of 1001 children with inguinal hernia that operated in surgical department Lviv regional children’s clinical hospital «OHMATDYT» during 2010–2015 years. The type of the open herniotomy depended of the age of patients: Duamel I type was applied in children aged 1–3 year; Duamel II type – in children aged 3–8 year, in patients over 8 years – Martynov or Roux-Krasnobaev type. Laparoscopic operations with the PIRS method were performed in 318 patients and open methods were applied in 683 children. Pneumoperitoneum is established using the open Hasson technique with the working pressure 5–10 mm Hg in dependence of patients’ age.

Results. Any operation, independently is it open or mini-invasive, may accompanied by the various pattern of complications that arisen during operation, early or in follow-up. The different complications after open surgery were noted in 24% of children; while after laparoscopic treatment the complications were noted in 7.2% of patients (p<0.05). The rate of hernia recurrence is an important criterion of the efficacy of the treatment of inguinal hernia. Recurrent hernia diagnosed in 2.8% of children after open herniotomy and in 1.3% – after laparoscopic treatment. Frequency of the testicular complications (hydrocele, retraction and hypoplasia) had no significant difference in both groups of patients. The possibility to simultaneously closure of the contralateral patent processus vaginalis is one of the advantages of laparoscopic herniotomy. Metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia developed in 7.9% of children after open herniotomy.

Conclusion. The frequency of particular complications in the postoperative period did not depended by the method of surgical correction. By that, the complications after laparoscopy not so often as after open surgery, but in most cases, except the frequency of the recurrence and development of intestinal obstruction, this difference is not significant. The general frequency of complications is higher after open surgery when compared with the mini-invasive methods.

Key words: children, inguinal hernia, open surgery, laparoscopy.


1. Bisgaard T et al. 2014. Acceptable nationwide outcome after paediatric inguinal hernia repair. Hernia. 18: 325–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1077-8.

2. Davies BW et al. 2003. A prospective study of neonatal inguinal herniotomy: the problem of the postoperative hydrocele. Pediatr Surg Int. 19: 68–70. doi 10.1007/s00383-002-0805-4.

3. Lee DY et al. 2015.A purse-string suture at the level of internal inguinal ring, taking only the peritoneum leaving the distal sac: is it enough for inguinal hernia in pediatric patients? Hernia. 19: 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1453-7.

4. Giseke S et al. 2010. A true laparoscopic herniotomy in children: evaluation of long-term outcome. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Techn A. 20: 191–194. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2009.0069.

5. Kara O et al. 2015. Does percutaneous internal ring suturing contain risk of ilioinguinal nerve entrapment? Pediatr Surg Int. 31: 485–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-015-3689-9.

6. Tanriverdi HI et al. 2015. Does the percutaneous internal ring suturing technique impair testicular vascularization in children undergoing inguinal hernia repair? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Techn A. 25: 951–953. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2015.0234.

7. Wenk K et al. 2015. Incidence of metachronous contralateral inguinal hernias in children following unilateral repair – A meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Pediatr Surg. 50: 2147–2154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.08.056.

8. Shalaby R et al. 2012. Laparoscopic hernia repair versus open herniotomy in children: A controlled randomized study. Minim Invasive Surg. 2012; Article ID 484135: 8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/484135.

9. Timberlake MD et al. 2015. Laparoscopic percutaneous inguinal hernia repair in children: Review of technique and comparison with open surgery. J Pediatr Urol. 11: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.04.008.

10. Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair in pediatric patients: a systematic review / Esposito C. [et al.] // J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. A. – 2014. – Vol. 24. – P. 811–818. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2014.0194.

11. Yang C et al. 2011. Laparoscopic vs open herniorrhaphy in the management of pediatric inguinal hernia: a systemic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg. 46: 1824–1834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.04.001.

12. Bruzoni M et al. 2015. Long-term follow-up of laparoscopic transcutaneous inguinal herniorraphy with high transfixation suture ligature of the hernia sac. J Pediatr Surg. 50: 1767–1771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.06.006.

13. Nazem M et al. 2015. Outcomes of pediatric inguinal hernia repair with or without opening the external oblique muscle fascia. J Res Med Sci. 20: 1172–1176. https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-1995.172985.

14. Feng S et al. 2015. Open versus laparoscopic inguinal herniotomy in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis focusing on postoperative complications. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 25: 275–280. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000161.

15. Pant N et al. 2014. Laparoscopic repair of hernia in children: Comparison between ligation and nonligation of sac. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 19: 76–79. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-9261.129597.

16. Patkowski D et al. 2006. Percutaneous internal ring suturing: a simple minimally invasive technique for inguinal hernia repair in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Techn A. 16: 513–517. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2006.16.513

17. Thomas DT et al. 2016. Percutaneous internal ring suturing is a safe and effective method for the minimal invasive treatment of pediatric inguinal hernia: Experience with 250 cases. J Pediatr Surg. 51: 1330–1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.11.024.

18. Ravikumar V et al. 2013. A clinical study on the management of inguinal hernias in children on the general surgical practice. J Clin Diagn Res. 7: 144–147. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2012/4868.2690..

19. Steven M et al. 2016. Simple purse string laparoscopic versus open hernia repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 26: 144–147. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2014.0276.