HEALTH OF WOMAN. 2017.7(123):139–142

James M.N. Duffy, Martin Hirsch, Chris Gale, Louise Pealing, Anusuya Kawsar, Marian Showell, Paula R. Williamson, Khalid S. Khan, Sue Ziebland, Richard J. McManus
Від імені Міжнародного співробітництва з гармонізації результатів прееклампсії (ІХОП)
Скорочений варіант. Адаптовано – С.J. Шурпяк

Література:
1. Tranquilli AL, Dekker G, Magee L, et al. The classi ca on, diagnosis and management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A revised statement from the ISSHP. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2014;4:97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2014.02.001; PMid:26104417

2. Ioannidis JPA, Greenland S, Hlatky MA, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis. Lancet. 2014;383:166–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62227-8

3. Du y JMN, van ‘t Hoo J, Gale C, et al. A protocol for developing, dis- semina ng, and implemen ng a core outcome set for pre-eclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2016;6:274–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2016.04.008; PMid:27939467

4. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, et al. CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for repor ng parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c332. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c332; PMid:20332509 PMCid:PMC2844940

5. Mace eld RC, Boulind CE, Blazeby JM. Selec ng and measuring op – mal outcomes for randomised controlled trials in surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014;399:263–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-013-1136-8; PMid:24233344 PMCid:PMC3961630

6. Saini P, Loke YK, Gamble C, Altman DG, Williamson PR, Kirkham JJ. Selec ve repor ng bias of harm outcomes within studies: Findings from a cohort of systema c reviews. BMJ. 2014;349:g6501. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g6501; PMid:25416499 PMCid:PMC4240443

7. Hu on JL, Williamson PR. Bias in meta-analysis due to outcome vari- able selec on within studies. J Roy Stat Soc. 2000;49:359–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9876.00197

8. Du y JMN, McManus RJ. In uence of methodology upon the iden – ca on of poten al core outcomes. Recommenda ons for core outcome set developers are needed. BJOG. 2016;123:1599.

9. Cordoba G, Schwartz L, Woloshin S, Bae H, Gotzsche PC. De ni on, repor ng, and interpreta on of composite outcomes in clinical trials: Systema c review. BMJ. 2010;341:c3920. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c3920; PMid:20719825 PMCid:PMC2923692

10. Libera A, Altman DG, Tetzla J, et al. The PRISMA statement for repor ng systema c reviews and meta-analyses of studies that eval- uate health care interven ons: Explana on and elabora on. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:e1–e34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006; PMid:19631507

11. Hirsch M, Du y JMN, Kusznir JO, et al. Varia on in outcome report- ing in endometriosis trials: A systema c review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214:452–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.039; PMid:26778385

12. Mya L, Redman CW, Sta AC, et al. Strategy for standardiza- on of preeclampsia research study design. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2014;63: 1293–1301.

13. Du y JMN, Rolph R, Gale C, et al. Core outcome sets in women’s and newborn health: A systema c review. BJOG. 2017;124:1481–1489. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14694; PMid:28421657

14. Du y JMN, Bha acharya S, Herman M, et al. Reducing research waste in benign gynaecology and fer lity research. BJOG. 2017;124: 366–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14438; PMid:28120536

15. Williamson PR, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, et al. Developing core out- come sets for clinical trials: Issues to consider. Trials. 2012;13:132. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-132; PMid:22867278 PMCid:PMC3472231

16. Hirsch M, Du y JMN, Barker C, et al. Protocol for developing, dissem- ina ng and implemen ng a core outcome set for endometriosis. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e013998. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013998; PMid:28003300 PMCid:PMC5223702

17. Whitehouse KC, Kim CR, Ganatra B, et al. Standardizing abor on research outcomes (STAR): A protocol for developing, dissemina ng and implemen ng a core outcome set for medical and surgical abor- on. Contracep on. 2017;95: 437–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2016.12.009; PMid:28065833 PMCid:PMC5473939

18. van ‘t Hoo J, Du y JMN, Daly M, et al. A core outcome set for evalua on of interven ons to prevent preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127: 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001195; PMid:26646133

19. Du y JMN, Hirsch M, Kawsar A, et al. Outcome repor ng across randomised controlled trials evalua ng therapeu c interven ons for pre-eclampsia: A systema c review. BJOG. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14702. [Epub ahead of print].