• The modern view on the endocrine function of the placenta (literature review)

The modern view on the endocrine function of the placenta (literature review)

PERINATOLOGIYA I PEDIATRIYA. 2016.4(68):33-36; doi 10.15574/PP.2016.68.33 
 

The modern view on the endocrine function of the placenta (literature review)


Tumanova L. E, Kolomiets О. V.

SI «Institute of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology of NAMS of Ukraine», Kyiv


The paper summarizes current information about one of the most important functions of the placenta — endocrine. Deals, the main function of the protein hormone 
produced by the placenta. Study of the role of cytokines and growth factors opens a new era in the study of endocrine and immune relationship during pregnancy.


Key words: placental hormones, growth factors, pregnancy.


References

1. Antypkin YuH, Zadorozhna TD, Parnytska OI. 2016. Patolohiia platsenty (suchasni aspekty). Kyiv, DU «IPAH NAMN Ukrainy»: 124.

2. Ancheva IA. 2014. Patomorfolohichnyi substrat prohresuvannia dysfunktsiii platsenty u vahitnykh z proiavamy sydoropenichnoho syndromu. Visnyk morfolohii. 2; 20: 406—409.

3. Barinova IV, Kotov YuB. 2013. Sravnitelnyie aspektyi patogeneza fetoplatsentarnoy nedostatochnosti s antenatalnoy gibelyu ploda i s rozhdeniem zhivogo novorozhdennogo. Rossiyskiy vestnik akushera-ginekologa. 4: 22—26.

4. Milovanov AP. 1999. Patologiya sistemyi mat — platsenta — plod. Rukovodstvo dlya vrachey. Moskva, Meditsina: 448.

5. Zadorozhna TD, Tumanova LIe, Bannikov VI, Yeshchenko OI. 2008. Morfolohichni ta imunohistokhimichni osoblyvosti struktur platsent vid zhinok z EKZ. Svit medytsyny ta biolohii. 2: 94—96.

6. Davydova I, Zadorozhna T, Butenko L, Limanskaya A, Ogorodnyk A, Mokrik A. 2016. Prevention of hypoxic fetal complications in pregnant women with congenital heart disease and anemia. Perinatologiya i pediatriya. 2(66): 43—47. doi 10.15574/PP.2016.66.43

7. Sidelnikova VM. 2009.Endokrinologiya beremennosti v norme i pri patologii. Moskva, Medpress-inform: 351.

8. Bukovsky A, Caudle MR, Cekanova M et al. 2003. Placental expression of estrogen receptor beta and its hormone binding variant comparison with estrogen receptor alpha and a role for estrogen receptors in asymmetric division and differentiation of estrogen-dependent cells. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 1: 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-1-46https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-1-1https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-1-13https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-1-56https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-1-36; PMid:12740031 PMCid:PMC155643

9. Bates GWJr, Ginsburg ES. 2002. Early pregnancy loss in vitro fertilization (IVF) is a positive predictor of subsequent IVF success. Fertil Steril. 2: 337—341. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(01)02988-0

10. Ramirez-Volez R, Bustamante J, Czerniczyniec A et al. 2013. Effect of exercise training on Enos expression, NO production and oxygen metabolism in human placenta. PLoS One. 8(11): е80225.

11. Longtine MS, Nelson DM. 2011. Placental dysfunction and fetal programming: the importance of placental size, shape, histopathology, and molecular composition. Semin Reprod Med. 29(3): 187—196. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1275515; PMid:21710395 PMCid:PMC3682832

12. Carolyn JP, Jones AM, Carter AllenSandra WR, Wilsher A. 2016. Morphology, histochemistry and glycosylation of the placenta and associated tissues in the European hedgehog (Erinaceus europaeus). Placenta. 48: 1—12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2016.09.010; PMid:27871459

13. Nijman TAJ, van Vliet EOG, Benders MJN et al. 2016, Oct 13. Placental histology in spontaneous and indicated preterm birth: a case control study. Placenta: 56—62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2016.10.006; PMid:27871473

14. Baschat AA, Cosmi E, Bilardo CM et al. 2007. Predictors of neonatal outcome in early-onset placental dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol. 109; 2 Pt 1: 253—261. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000253215.79121.75; PMid:17267821

15. Stanek J, Biesiada J, Trzeszcz M. 2014. Clinicoplacental phenotypes vary with gestational age: an analysis by classical and clustering methods. Acta Obst Gynecol Scand. 93(4): 392—398. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12350; PMid:24506140