• External obstetric turn and decrease in the frequency of pelvic fetal presentation

External obstetric turn and decrease in the frequency of pelvic fetal presentation

HEALTH OF WOMAN. 2017.3(119):123–127

Green-top Guideline No. 20a, March 2017
Abridged version. Adapted – S.A. Shurpyak
This is the second edition of the manual, the first was published in 2006.


1. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Management of Breech Presentation. Green-top Guideline No. 20b. London, RCOG. 2017.

2. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR. 2000. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomisedmulticentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet 356:1375–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02840-3

3. Rietberg CC, Elferink-Stinkens PM, Visser GH. 2005. The effect of the Term Breech Trial on medical intervention behaviour and neonatal outcome in The Netherlands: an analysis of 35,453 term breech infants. BJOG 112:205–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00317.x; PMid:15663585

4. Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R, West HM. 2015. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD000083. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000083.pub3

5. Beuckens A, Rijnders M, Verburgt-Doeleman GH, Rijninks-van Driel GC, Thorpe J, Hutton EK. 2015. An observational study of the success and complications of 2546 external cephalic versions in low-risk pregnant women performed by trained midwives. BJOG 123:415–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13234; PMid:25639281

6. Tong Leung VK, Suen SS, Singh Sahota D, Lau TK, Yeung Leung T. 2012. External cephalic version does not increase the risk of intra-uterine death: a 17-year experience and literature review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 25:1774–8. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2012.663828; PMid:22468582

7. Ferreira JC, Borowski D, Czuba B, Cnota W, Wloch A, Sodowski K et al. 2015. The evolution of fetal presentation during pregnancy: a retrospective, descriptive cross-sectional study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 94:660–3. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12626; PMid:25753199

8. Westgren M, Edvall H, Nordström L, Svalenius E, Ranstam J. 1985. Spontaneous cephalic version of breech presentation in the last trimester. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 92:19–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1985.tb01043.x; PMid:3881123

9. Ben-Meir A, Elram T, Tsafrir A, Elchalal U, Ezra Y. 2007. The incidence of spontaneous version after failed external cephalic version. Am J ObstetGynecol 196:157.e1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2006.10.889; PMid:17306662

10. Collins S, Ellaway P, Harrington D, Pandit M, Impey LW. 2007. The complications of external cephalic version: results from 805 consecutive attempts. BJOG 114:636–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01271.x; PMid:17355270

11. de Hundt M, Velzel J, de Groot CJ, Mol BW, Kok M. 2014. Mode of delivery after successful external cephalic version: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ObstetGynecol 123:1327–34. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000295

12. Kabiri D, Elram T, Aboo-Dia M, Elami-Suzin M, Elchalal U, Ezra Y. 2011. Timing of delivery after external cephalic version and the risk for cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 118:209–13. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822545a9; PMid:21775835

13. Kok M, Cnossen J, Gravendeel L, van der Post J, Opmeer B, Mol BW. 2008. Clinical factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199:630.e1–7; discussion e1–5.

14. Kok M, Cnossen J, Gravendeel L, Van Der Post JA, Mol BW. 2009. Ultrasound factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound ObstetGynecol 33:76–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.6277

15. Kok M, van der Steeg JW, van der Post JA, Mol BW. 2011. Prediction of success of external cephalic version after 36 weeks. Am J Perinatol 28:103–10. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1262909; PMid:20661845

16. Velzel J, de Hundt M, Mulder FM, Molkenboer JF, Van der Post JA, Mol BW et al. 2015. Prediction models for successful external cephalic version: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 195:160–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.10.007; PMid:26546757

17. Leung TY, Lau TK. 2005. Prediction of outcome of external cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Fetal Matern Med Rev 16:245–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/S096553950500149X

18. Cluver C, Gyte GM, Sinclair M, Dowswell T, Hofmeyr GJ. 2015. Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic version. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD000184. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000184.pub4

19. Wilcox CB, Nassar N, Roberts CL. 2011. Effectiveness of nifedipinetocolysis to facilitate external cephalic version: a systematic review. BJOG 118:423–8. . https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02824.x; PMid:21199292

20. El-Sayed YY, Pullen K, Riley ET, Lyell D, Druzin ML, Cohen SE et al. 2004. Randomized comparison of intravenous nitroglycerin and subcutaneous terbutaline for external cephalic version under tocolysis. Am J ObstetGynecol 191:2051–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.04.040; PMid:15592291

21. Impey L, Pandit M. 2005. Tocolysis for repeat external cephalic version in breech presentation at term: a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. BJOG 112:627–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00518.x; PMid:15842288

22. Suen SS, Khaw KS, Law LW, Sahota DS, Lee SW, Lau TK et al. 2012. The force applied to successfully turn a foetus during reattempts of external cephalic version is substantially reduced when performed under spinal analgesia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 25:719–22. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2011.589931; PMid:22043832

23. Weiniger CF, Ginosar Y, Elchalal U, Sela HY, Weissman C, Ezra Y. 2010. Randomized controlled trial of external cephalic version in term multiparae with or without spinal analgesia. Br J Anaesth 104:613–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeq053; PMid:20338954

24. Khaw KS, Lee SW, Ngan Kee WD, Law LW, Lau TK, Ng FF et al. 2015. Randomized trial of anaesthetic interventions in external cephalic version for breech presentation. Br J Anaesth 114:944–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aev107; PMid:25962611

25. Sultan P, Carvalho B. 2011. Neuraxial blockade for external cephalic version: a systematic review. Int J Obstet Anesth 20:299–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2011.07.001; PMid:21925869

26. Goetzinger KR, Harper LM, Tuuli MG, Macones GA, Colditz GA. 2011. Effect of regional anesthesia on the success rate of external cephalic version: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 118:1137–44. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182324583; PMid:22015882 PMCid:PMC3199126

27. Lavoie A, Guay J. 2010. Anesthetic dose neuraxial blockade increases the success rate of external fetal version: a meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth 57:408–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-010-9278-4; PMid:20127530

28. Reinhard J, Heinrich TM, Reitter A, Herrmann E, Smart W, Louwen F. 2012. Clinical hypnosis before external cephalic version. Am J Clin Hypn 55:184–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2012.665399; PMid:23189523

29. Hutton EK, Hannah ME, Ross SJ, Delisle MF, Carson GD, Windrim R et al. 2011. Early ECV2 Trial Collaborative Group. The Early External Cephalic Version (ECV) 2 Trial: an international multicentrerandomised controlled trial of timing of ECV for breech pregnancies. BJOG 118:564–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02837.x; PMid:21291506 PMCid:PMC3085121

30. Hutton EK, Hofmeyr GJ, Dowswell T. 2015. External cephalic version for breech presentation before term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (7):CD000084. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000084.pub3

31. Ferguson JE 2nd, Dyson DC. 1985. Intrapartum external cephalic version. Am J ObstetGynecol 152:297–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(85)80214-3

32. Kaneti H, Rosen D, Markov S, Beyth Y, Fejgin MD. 2000. Intrapartum external cephalic version of footling-breech presentation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 79:1083–5. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0412.2000.0790121083.x; https://doi.org/10.3109/00016340009169268; PMid:11130092

33. Rosman AN, Guijt A, Vlemmix F, Rijnders M, Mol BW, Kok M. 2013. Contraindications for external cephalic version in breech position at term: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 92:137–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12011; PMid:22994660

34. Burgos J, Cobos P, Rodrэguez L, Osuna C, Centeno MM, Mart эnez-Astorquiza T et al. 2014. Is external cephalic version at term contraindicated in previous caesarean section? A prospective comparative cohort study BJOG 121:230–5; discussion 235. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12487; PMid:24245964

35. Rijnders M, Herschderfer K, Prins M, van Baaren R, van Veelen AJ, Scho€nbeck Y et al. 2008. A retrospective study of the success, safety and effectiveness of external cephalic version without tocolysis in a specialised midwifery centre in the Netherlands. Midwifery 24:38–45. ttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2006.07.009; PMid:17196716

36. Grootscholten K, Kok M, Oei SG, Mol BW, van der Post JA. 2008. External cephalic version-related risks: a meta-analysis. ObstetGynecol 112:1143–51. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818b4ade; PMid:18978117

37. Nassar N, Roberts CL, Barratt A, Bell JC, Olive EC, Peat B. 2006. Systematic review of adverse outcomes of external cephalic version and persisting breech presentation at term. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 20:163–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3016.2006.00702.x; PMid:16466434

38. Collaris RJ, Oei SG. 2004. External cephalic version: a safe procedure? A systematic review of version-related risks. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83:511–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00347.x; PMid:15144330

39. Balayla J, Dahdouh EM, Villeneuve S, Boucher M, Gauthier RJ, Audibert F et al. 2015. Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes following unsuccessful external cephalic version: a stratified analysis amongst failures, successes, and controls. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 28:605–10. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2014.927429; PMid:24853490

40. Boucher M, Marquette GP, Varin J, Champagne J, Bujold E. 2008. Fetomaternal hemorrhage during external cephalic version. ObstetGynecol 112:79–84. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e318179978c; PMid:18591311

41. Qureshi H, Massey E, Kirwan D, Davies T, Robson S, White J et al. 2014. British Society for Haematology. BCSH guideline for the use of anti-D immunoglobulin for the prevention of haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Transfus Med 24:8–20.  https://doi.org/10.1111/tme.12091; PMid:25121158

42. Burr R, Helyer P, Robson SC. 2001. A training model for external cephalic version. Eur J ObstetGynecolReprodBiol 99:199–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-2115(01)00388-8

43. Hemelaar J, Lim LN, Impey LW. 2015. The impact of an ECV service is limited by antenatal breech detection: a retrospective cohort study. Birth 42:165–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12162; PMid:25872703

44. Say R, Thomson R, Robson S, Exley C. 2013. A qualitative interview study exploring pregnant women’s and health professionals’ attitudes to external cephalic version. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 13:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-4; PMid:23324533 PMCid:PMC3567941

45. Rosman AN, Vlemmix F, Fleuren MA, Rijnders ME, Beuckens A, Opmeer BC et al. 2014. Patients’ and professionals’ barriers and facilitators to external cephalic version for breech presentation at term, a qualitative analysis in the Netherlands. Midwifery 30:324–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2013.03.013; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2014.01.002

46. Rijnders M, Offerhaus P, van Dommelen P, Wiegers T, Buitendijk S. 2010. Prevalence, outcome, and women’s experiences of external cephalic version in a low-risk population. Birth 37: 124–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00392.x; PMid:20557535

47. Bogner G, Hammer BE, Schausberger C, Fischer T, Reisenberger K, Jacobs V. 2014. Patient satisfaction with childbirth after external cephalic version. Arch Gynecol Obstet 289:523–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-3007-5; PMid:23959092

48. Fok WY, Chan LW, Leung TY, Lau TK. 2005. Maternal experience of pain during external cephalic version at term. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 84:748–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00505.x; PMid:16026399

49. Mukaindo AM, Wanyonyi SZ, Stones WR. 2012. External cephalic version in East, Central, and Southern Africa. Int J GynaecolObstet 116:228–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.10.025; PMid:22196991

50. Nassar N, Roberts CL, Cameron CA, Peat B. 2006. Outcomes of external cephalic version and breech presentation at term, an audit of deliveries at a Sydney tertiary obstetric hospital, 1997-2004. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 85:1231–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016340600853651; PMid:17068683

51. Su M, McLeod L, Ross S, Willan A, Hannah WJ, Hutton E et al. 2003. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group Factors associated with adverse perinatal outcome in the Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:740–5. https://doi.org/10.1067/S0002-9378(03)00822-6

52. Nassar N, Roberts CL, Cameron CA, Olive EC. 2006. Diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination for detection of non-cephalic presentation in late pregnancy: cross sectional analytic study. BMJ 333:578–80. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38919.681563.4F; PMid:16891327 PMCid:PMC1570002

53. Ford JB, Roberts CL, Nassar N, Giles W, Morris JM. 2010. Recurrence of breech presentation in consecutive pregnancies. BJOG 117:830–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02576.x; PMid:20482538 PMCid:PMC2883072

54. Coyle ME, Smith CA, Peat B. 2012. Cephalic version by moxibustion for breech presentation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (5):CD003928. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003928.pub3

55. Vas J, Aranda-Regules JM, Modesto M, Ramos-Monserrat M, Barón M, Aguilar I et al. 2013. Using moxibustion in primary healthcare to correct non-vertex presentation: a multicentrerandomised controlled trial. Acupunct Med 31:31–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/acupmed-2012-010261; PMid:23249535

56. Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R. 2012. Cephalic version by postural management for breech presentation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (10):CD000051. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000051.pub2

Содержание журнала Full text of article